The "Freeola Customer Forum" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
If it was up to you, would you have a strong-ish relationship ('going out') or would you have a very strong friendship with a member of the opposite sex?
I'm more of a friendship guy myself, seeing as I don't have the balls to ask someone out in the first place.
What aboot you?
I'm more of a friendship guy myself, seeing as I don't have the balls to ask someone out in the first place.
What aboot you?
Page:
kitkat wrote:
> ah, ok
> guess we all defend our opinions if we're passionate enuf to
Or have little else to do.
> ah, ok
> guess we all defend our opinions if we're passionate enuf to
Or have little else to do.
Unbeliever wrote:
> "me love you long time"
Surely that's in respect to the physical act, thoguh...
> "me love you long time"
Surely that's in respect to the physical act, thoguh...
Light wrote:
> kitkat wrote:
> If you don't like critisism and people reacting to your posts then
> don't post then in the first place. I'm only giving my opinion
> aswell. Is that ok? If you remember, you seemed to rant in your
> first
> post about women.
>
> Don't fret too much; IB has this quaint idea that everyone should
> always be dazzled by the self-evident brilliance of what he says. He
> gets most red-faced and angry when he's called into question...
>
> Of course, I'm not above tearing into people who do the same to me,
> but such is life...
ah, ok
guess we all defend our opinions if we're passionate enuf to
> kitkat wrote:
> If you don't like critisism and people reacting to your posts then
> don't post then in the first place. I'm only giving my opinion
> aswell. Is that ok? If you remember, you seemed to rant in your
> first
> post about women.
>
> Don't fret too much; IB has this quaint idea that everyone should
> always be dazzled by the self-evident brilliance of what he says. He
> gets most red-faced and angry when he's called into question...
>
> Of course, I'm not above tearing into people who do the same to me,
> but such is life...
ah, ok
guess we all defend our opinions if we're passionate enuf to
Light wrote:
> Don't fret too much; IB has this quaint idea that everyone should
> always be dazzled by the self-evident brilliance of what he says. He
> gets most red-faced and angry when he's called into question...
What brilliance? I've stated something from my experiences, I don't expect everyone to throw down their flower bunches and scream for refunds. I'm long adjusted to the fact that nothing I say on the internet will have any effect on people's future actions. I'm just having an argument because it helps pass a little time.
> Don't fret too much; IB has this quaint idea that everyone should
> always be dazzled by the self-evident brilliance of what he says. He
> gets most red-faced and angry when he's called into question...
What brilliance? I've stated something from my experiences, I don't expect everyone to throw down their flower bunches and scream for refunds. I'm long adjusted to the fact that nothing I say on the internet will have any effect on people's future actions. I'm just having an argument because it helps pass a little time.
Insane Bartender wrote:
> but personally, I was under the impression that love was the one thing you couldn't buy.
I beg to differ. Take a trip down to Thailand.
"me love you long time"
> but personally, I was under the impression that love was the one thing you couldn't buy.
I beg to differ. Take a trip down to Thailand.
"me love you long time"
kitkat wrote:
> If you don't like critisism and people reacting to your posts then
> don't post then in the first place. I'm only giving my opinion
> aswell. Is that ok? If you remember, you seemed to rant in your first
> post about women.
Where did that come from? I posted my opinion, and you startde with the indignation, not me. I was just posting my opinion as well. If you're allowed to get red-faced and weepy over my thoughts, then I can react to yours as well. Or do you expect everythng to be exactly the way you want?
> If you don't like critisism and people reacting to your posts then
> don't post then in the first place. I'm only giving my opinion
> aswell. Is that ok? If you remember, you seemed to rant in your first
> post about women.
Where did that come from? I posted my opinion, and you startde with the indignation, not me. I was just posting my opinion as well. If you're allowed to get red-faced and weepy over my thoughts, then I can react to yours as well. Or do you expect everythng to be exactly the way you want?
Light wrote:
> That sentence says everything one really needs to know about why you
> view romance and relationships the way you do; you're a Me-monkey,
> unable to form meaningful social bonds with things that haven't
> appeared in sci-fi movies.
Riiiiiiiiiiiiiiight...
> Relationships are about give and take.
Fully agree.
> Romance is about doing
> something for someone else for no other reason than it will make them
> happy.
If you want to subscribe to that, go for it. Doesn't mean everyone has to. Relationships are about give and take, romance is about give and keep on giving.
> Clearly, this is not a concept you're entirely (or remotely) familiar
> with!
I'm thoroughly familiar with it. I've wasted more than my fair shaer on romantic gestures in the past, I just fail to see the point. I'm sure you have plenty of experiences where romance has bought you the world, but personally, I was under the impression that love was the one thing you couldn't buy.
> That sentence says everything one really needs to know about why you
> view romance and relationships the way you do; you're a Me-monkey,
> unable to form meaningful social bonds with things that haven't
> appeared in sci-fi movies.
Riiiiiiiiiiiiiiight...
> Relationships are about give and take.
Fully agree.
> Romance is about doing
> something for someone else for no other reason than it will make them
> happy.
If you want to subscribe to that, go for it. Doesn't mean everyone has to. Relationships are about give and take, romance is about give and keep on giving.
> Clearly, this is not a concept you're entirely (or remotely) familiar
> with!
I'm thoroughly familiar with it. I've wasted more than my fair shaer on romantic gestures in the past, I just fail to see the point. I'm sure you have plenty of experiences where romance has bought you the world, but personally, I was under the impression that love was the one thing you couldn't buy.
Oh, I'm not too sure. A romantic gesture here and there is always appreciated but if you have to continually do it, then you're with the wrong woman.
kitkat wrote:
> If you don't like critisism and people reacting to your posts then
> don't post then in the first place. I'm only giving my opinion
> aswell. Is that ok? If you remember, you seemed to rant in your first
> post about women.
Don't fret too much; IB has this quaint idea that everyone should always be dazzled by the self-evident brilliance of what he says. He gets most red-faced and angry when he's called into question...
Of course, I'm not above tearing into people who do the same to me, but such is life...
> If you don't like critisism and people reacting to your posts then
> don't post then in the first place. I'm only giving my opinion
> aswell. Is that ok? If you remember, you seemed to rant in your first
> post about women.
Don't fret too much; IB has this quaint idea that everyone should always be dazzled by the self-evident brilliance of what he says. He gets most red-faced and angry when he's called into question...
Of course, I'm not above tearing into people who do the same to me, but such is life...
....whereas my only fault* is a seeming inability to understand the difference between single and double clicking...
* - Please note use of sarcasm
* - Please note use of sarcasm
Page: