The "Freeola Customer Forum" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
If it was up to you, would you have a strong-ish relationship ('going out') or would you have a very strong friendship with a member of the opposite sex?
I'm more of a friendship guy myself, seeing as I don't have the balls to ask someone out in the first place.
What aboot you?
I'm more of a friendship guy myself, seeing as I don't have the balls to ask someone out in the first place.
What aboot you?
Page:
I like sticking pennies up my ass and pretending I'm a piggy bank!
Er...this isn't the right site for that is it?...damn bookmarks...
Er...this isn't the right site for that is it?...damn bookmarks...
HAHHAHAHAHHHHAAA!!
Insane Bartender wrote:
> Why is a little less romance suddenly making all love interests
> shallow and meaningless?
Wow...from "Romance is a waste of time" to "a little less romance" in less than 5 posts! That must be a backpeddling world record!
>
> Perhaps you should look to the issues of your own if you can't get by
> without actively having to inject life into your relationships.
> Personally, I'm doing just fine.
Bwahhahahahahaaa! Having been in a relationship for 12 years, I think my love life is just fine, cheers for asking.
But hey, if you can get by WITHOUT making any effort in your relationships....well, I hope the two of you will be very happy, and I have a puncture repair kit you can borrow if you need it.
> Why is a little less romance suddenly making all love interests
> shallow and meaningless?
Wow...from "Romance is a waste of time" to "a little less romance" in less than 5 posts! That must be a backpeddling world record!
>
> Perhaps you should look to the issues of your own if you can't get by
> without actively having to inject life into your relationships.
> Personally, I'm doing just fine.
Bwahhahahahahaaa! Having been in a relationship for 12 years, I think my love life is just fine, cheers for asking.
But hey, if you can get by WITHOUT making any effort in your relationships....well, I hope the two of you will be very happy, and I have a puncture repair kit you can borrow if you need it.
friendship
Light wrote:
> I don't pretend it makes a difference in any way, but neither to I
> pretend to not be bothered by what is said to and about me, and post
> over and over again just why that doesn't bother me. Methinks the
> Stormtrooper doth protest too much.
Not really, there's just little else to do in any other threads.
> I don't pretend it makes a difference in any way, but neither to I
> pretend to not be bothered by what is said to and about me, and post
> over and over again just why that doesn't bother me. Methinks the
> Stormtrooper doth protest too much.
Not really, there's just little else to do in any other threads.
Why is a little less romance suddenly making all love interests shallow and meaningless?
Perhaps you should look to the issues of your own if you can't get by without actively having to inject life into your relationships. Personally, I'm doing just fine.
Perhaps you should look to the issues of your own if you can't get by without actively having to inject life into your relationships. Personally, I'm doing just fine.
Insane Bartender wrote:
> I'm long adjusted to the fact that nothing I say on the
> internet will have any effect on people's future actions. I'm just
> having an argument because it helps pass a little time.
You're absolutely right; I'm doing exactly the same. But I enjoy watching you complain about being spoken to (or posted to) in the same way as you post to others.
I don't pretend it makes a difference in any way, but neither to I pretend to not be bothered by what is said to and about me, and post over and over again just why that doesn't bother me. Methinks the Stormtrooper doth protest too much.
> I'm long adjusted to the fact that nothing I say on the
> internet will have any effect on people's future actions. I'm just
> having an argument because it helps pass a little time.
You're absolutely right; I'm doing exactly the same. But I enjoy watching you complain about being spoken to (or posted to) in the same way as you post to others.
I don't pretend it makes a difference in any way, but neither to I pretend to not be bothered by what is said to and about me, and post over and over again just why that doesn't bother me. Methinks the Stormtrooper doth protest too much.
Insane Bartender wrote:
> Light wrote:
> That sentence says everything one really needs to know about why you
> view romance and relationships the way you do; you're a Me-monkey,
> unable to form meaningful social bonds with things that haven't
> appeared in sci-fi movies.
>
> Riiiiiiiiiiiiiiight...
Well...you haven't exactly done much to dispel that impression, so I'm sure you'll pardon me for voicing it!
>
> If you want to subscribe to that, go for it. Doesn't mean everyone
> has to. Relationships are about give and take, romance is about give
> and keep on giving.
Says you. I (and many others) say different. I'm not trying to change your mind here. Just pointing out how shallow and empty you are.
>
> I'm thoroughly familiar with it. I've wasted more than my fair shaer
> on romantic gestures in the past, I just fail to see the point. I'm
> sure you have plenty of experiences where romance has bought you the
> world, but personally, I was under the impression that love was the
> one thing you couldn't buy.
Wow...an entirely meaningless platitude that has just the faintest whiff of the profound about it! Nice one IB; a decent enough effort to try and make me seem in some way self-serving for actually wanting to romance somebody...especially as I didn't mention romance 'buying' anything; you just did. Which, again, says more about you than it does me! Anyway, to misquote Bill Hicks, I too have wasted romantic gestures. Doesn't mean I'm about to give up on women. I'd prefer an imperfect relationship with occasional romance than the sort of mechanically cold partnership you seem in favour of. But, to each there own; I've got no right to criticise whatever floats your boat. I'll take the proverbial, but I'll not criticise.
Staying on the subject, was this;
http://www.ananova.com/news/story/ sm_818206.html?menu=news.latestheadlines
you?
> Light wrote:
> That sentence says everything one really needs to know about why you
> view romance and relationships the way you do; you're a Me-monkey,
> unable to form meaningful social bonds with things that haven't
> appeared in sci-fi movies.
>
> Riiiiiiiiiiiiiiight...
Well...you haven't exactly done much to dispel that impression, so I'm sure you'll pardon me for voicing it!
>
> If you want to subscribe to that, go for it. Doesn't mean everyone
> has to. Relationships are about give and take, romance is about give
> and keep on giving.
Says you. I (and many others) say different. I'm not trying to change your mind here. Just pointing out how shallow and empty you are.
>
> I'm thoroughly familiar with it. I've wasted more than my fair shaer
> on romantic gestures in the past, I just fail to see the point. I'm
> sure you have plenty of experiences where romance has bought you the
> world, but personally, I was under the impression that love was the
> one thing you couldn't buy.
Wow...an entirely meaningless platitude that has just the faintest whiff of the profound about it! Nice one IB; a decent enough effort to try and make me seem in some way self-serving for actually wanting to romance somebody...especially as I didn't mention romance 'buying' anything; you just did. Which, again, says more about you than it does me! Anyway, to misquote Bill Hicks, I too have wasted romantic gestures. Doesn't mean I'm about to give up on women. I'd prefer an imperfect relationship with occasional romance than the sort of mechanically cold partnership you seem in favour of. But, to each there own; I've got no right to criticise whatever floats your boat. I'll take the proverbial, but I'll not criticise.
Staying on the subject, was this;
http://www.ananova.com/news/story/ sm_818206.html?menu=news.latestheadlines
you?
However, I lie and pretend to care in order to obtain sexual services from women.
I do believe in romance, relationships and all that.
Except for a while now, I've just been about drinks/meaningless sex and the refusal to phone her to see who breaks first.
And I win. Always.
Example: Last Friday she cracked and sent me a txt. I ignored it. She sent me another 30 mins later demanding I reply, because she had cancelled her evening with her mates in order to fulfill my perverted demands.
It is possible to be sincere, sweet and saccharine.
But it is also possible to be shallow, devious, insincere and boastful simply to add notches to the post.
I love being me at the moment.
I do believe in romance, relationships and all that.
Except for a while now, I've just been about drinks/meaningless sex and the refusal to phone her to see who breaks first.
And I win. Always.
Example: Last Friday she cracked and sent me a txt. I ignored it. She sent me another 30 mins later demanding I reply, because she had cancelled her evening with her mates in order to fulfill my perverted demands.
It is possible to be sincere, sweet and saccharine.
But it is also possible to be shallow, devious, insincere and boastful simply to add notches to the post.
I love being me at the moment.
Insane Bartender wrote:
> Unbeliever wrote:
> "me love you long time"
>
> Surely that's in respect to the physical act, thoguh...
Love is fickle. any fool can be blinded...
> Unbeliever wrote:
> "me love you long time"
>
> Surely that's in respect to the physical act, thoguh...
Love is fickle. any fool can be blinded...
Page: