The "Freeola Customer Forum" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
If it was up to you, would you have a strong-ish relationship ('going out') or would you have a very strong friendship with a member of the opposite sex?
I'm more of a friendship guy myself, seeing as I don't have the balls to ask someone out in the first place.
What aboot you?
I'm more of a friendship guy myself, seeing as I don't have the balls to ask someone out in the first place.
What aboot you?
Page:
If you don't like critisism and people reacting to your posts then don't post then in the first place. I'm only giving my opinion aswell. Is that ok? If you remember, you seemed to rant in your first post about women.
Insane Bartender wrote:
>
> Now then, tell me why I should sign up to being a romantic person?
> What does it gain me?
That sentence says everything one really needs to know about why you view romance and relationships the way you do; you're a Me-monkey, unable to form meaningful social bonds with things that haven't appeared in sci-fi movies.
Relationships are about give and take. Romance is about doing something for someone else for no other reason than it will make them happy.
Clearly, this is not a concept you're entirely (or remotely) familiar with!
>
> Now then, tell me why I should sign up to being a romantic person?
> What does it gain me?
That sentence says everything one really needs to know about why you view romance and relationships the way you do; you're a Me-monkey, unable to form meaningful social bonds with things that haven't appeared in sci-fi movies.
Relationships are about give and take. Romance is about doing something for someone else for no other reason than it will make them happy.
Clearly, this is not a concept you're entirely (or remotely) familiar with!
Insane Bartender wrote:
>
> Now then, tell me why I should sign up to being a romantic person?
> What does it gain me?
That sentence says everything one really needs to know about why you view romance and relationships the way you do; you're a Me-monkey, unable to form meaningful social bonds with things that haven't appeared in sci-fi movies.
Relationships are about give and take. Romance is about doing something for someone else for no other reason than it will make them happy.
Clearly, this is not a concept you're entirely (or remotely) familiar with!
I
>
> Now then, tell me why I should sign up to being a romantic person?
> What does it gain me?
That sentence says everything one really needs to know about why you view romance and relationships the way you do; you're a Me-monkey, unable to form meaningful social bonds with things that haven't appeared in sci-fi movies.
Relationships are about give and take. Romance is about doing something for someone else for no other reason than it will make them happy.
Clearly, this is not a concept you're entirely (or remotely) familiar with!
I
Light wrote:
> Now lets not be too harsh on IB. He could just be an embittered single
> man. Or (and if anyone has any photo's to confirm this, post away!)
> he might simply have a girlfriend who resembles the missing link
> between man and elephant, hence his aversion to romance.
Now then, tell me why I should sign up to being a romantic person? What does it gain me? I'm not interested in the type of women that can be bought and sold with a few well-timed flowery gestures and a box of Cadbury's Milk Tray.
> Now lets not be too harsh on IB. He could just be an embittered single
> man. Or (and if anyone has any photo's to confirm this, post away!)
> he might simply have a girlfriend who resembles the missing link
> between man and elephant, hence his aversion to romance.
Now then, tell me why I should sign up to being a romantic person? What does it gain me? I'm not interested in the type of women that can be bought and sold with a few well-timed flowery gestures and a box of Cadbury's Milk Tray.
Clearly not, as you're still ranting as though I came up to your face and scribbled "filthy, soliciting whóre" all over your face.
Insane Bartender wrote:
> Yes, I did, and you said "What a load of bo***cks!
> Prostitutes!????", which indicates to me that you either didn't
> read it properly, or are incapable of understanding what I said.
>
> Again, take your pick.
I said "what a load of bo**ocks" as I don't agree with what you said overall. And said "Prostitutes!" as I was surprised at what you said. But yes I did read it properly and understood what you were saying.
> Yes, I did, and you said "What a load of bo***cks!
> Prostitutes!????", which indicates to me that you either didn't
> read it properly, or are incapable of understanding what I said.
>
> Again, take your pick.
I said "what a load of bo**ocks" as I don't agree with what you said overall. And said "Prostitutes!" as I was surprised at what you said. But yes I did read it properly and understood what you were saying.
Now lets not be too harsh on IB. He could just be an embittered single man. Or (and if anyone has any photo's to confirm this, post away!) he might simply have a girlfriend who resembles the missing link between man and elephant, hence his aversion to romance.
Actually...why is anyone even listening to him?! The day I for one take advice on matters of the heart from a man who's homoerotic stormtrooper fantasies can cause nausea at 30 paces will be a cold day in hell...
Actually...why is anyone even listening to him?! The day I for one take advice on matters of the heart from a man who's homoerotic stormtrooper fantasies can cause nausea at 30 paces will be a cold day in hell...
I'm hurt.
I agree with goatboy. I just hope I don't ever meet a man as cynical and insensitive (the list could go on) as you seem to be, Insane Bartender.
Yes, I did, and you said "What a load of bo***cks! Prostitutes!????", which indicates to me that you either didn't read it properly, or are incapable of understanding what I said.
Again, take your pick.
Again, take your pick.
Page: