The "Freeola Customer Forum" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
> England aren't offering much of a resistance.
Excuse me?
Phoenix beaten by the Foxes on Friday *sob* so I hope we do a helluva lot better tonight in the Roses match.
By the way, this is brilliant entertainment, I think it's great the commentators have been talking to the Yorkshire fielders via ear pieces as well. They should make the World Cup Twenty20.
> The Question then is who goes when Flintoff returns? A batsmen or
> a bowler? Logically I think a batsmen will go as England seem to
> prefer a five pronged bowling attack, especially with the
> mis-firing of Harmison, the inconsistency of Plunkett, and of
> course England should be careful not to over-bowl Flintoff.
>
> Also, Hoggard has to return, so one of the bowlers will probably
> go, not to mention when Simon Jones makes his long awaited
> return, although I can't see that happening in this series, the
> same with Trescothick.
>
> When Hoggard and Flintoff are fit I think the England team
> should be something like:
>
> Strauss
> Cook
> Vaughan
> Pietersen
> Collingwood/Bell
> Flintoff
> Prior
> Sidebottom/Plunkett
> Hoggard
> Harmison
> Panesar
>
> I could see Bell being drop due to Collingwood also being a
> competent bowler. Not sure about Plunkett and Sidebottom, I
> think Sidebottom should stay after his performance in the second
> test and the fact he offers something different.
>
> However, If Trescothick comes back, I'd drop Collingwood (Or
> Bell) and have an England batting line up of:
>
> Trescothick
> Cook
> Vaughan
> Strauss
> Pietersen
>
> Even though I doubt Trescothick will come back, and if he does
> it's more likely top be for ODI's.
I stick by that team following the series, for the one-dayers i'd do a straight swap of Trescothick for Cook (Who doesn't play in the ODI's), Or Vaughan, i'm not sure if he's retiring??