The "Freeola Customer Forum" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
Another thread on Mikey, true. But I have to keep my hopes up. Losing my favourite 'Pool striker is a blow that can only be softened with the return of the only 'Pool player I have loved more than him. Mikey is on his way back - that's what The Times seems to think:
[URL]http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,428-1736832,00.html[/URL]
Read that in my paper this morning before my run, and then amused myself by thinking of Mikey while running (not in a gay way).
Stevie says he'll talk to him in the England training camp. No-one can turn down Stevie. No man, no woman.
[URL]http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,428-1736832,00.html[/URL]
Read that in my paper this morning before my run, and then amused myself by thinking of Mikey while running (not in a gay way).
Stevie says he'll talk to him in the England training camp. No-one can turn down Stevie. No man, no woman.
Page:
Hmm, strange. Surely he has enough players who can perform that role well?
Ah, fair enough. Souness seems to be employing Emre solely in a centre mid role though.
I've only seen him play on the left or right. You may be right, but he can definitely play out wide. Plus Luque can do left wing, so if they get him and another striker they can use Luque there.
Blank wrote:
> ...Emre? You know, the left footed midfielder they've just bought and
> you just mentioned?
Centre Mid isn't he?
> ...Emre? You know, the left footed midfielder they've just bought and
> you just mentioned?
Centre Mid isn't he?
Stryke wrote:
> Yeah, good point. You're still stupid, though. I hold firmly to my
> position on that one.
Hmmmmm. Fair enough.
I'm stupid and Newcastle have a good midfield.
End.
> Yeah, good point. You're still stupid, though. I hold firmly to my
> position on that one.
Hmmmmm. Fair enough.
I'm stupid and Newcastle have a good midfield.
End.
Yeah, good point. You're still stupid, though. I hold firmly to my position on that one.
Stryke wrote:
> And, I was talking about the Charlton to Chelsea switch. But Dringo's
> too stupid to understand. It all seems so pointless now anyway, with
> the Planeteers on board.
Since when did I disagree with your view on Parker? It was Mav that didn't understand the deserter comment.
If you're gonna insult someone get it right.
Looks like Stryke is slipping.
> And, I was talking about the Charlton to Chelsea switch. But Dringo's
> too stupid to understand. It all seems so pointless now anyway, with
> the Planeteers on board.
Since when did I disagree with your view on Parker? It was Mav that didn't understand the deserter comment.
If you're gonna insult someone get it right.
Looks like Stryke is slipping.
RastaBillySkank wrote:
> Newcastle's problem is with wingers. They've got what looks to be a
> very tasty partnership in Parker and Emre, but they're not too sharp
> on the wings. Jenas is more a central midfielder than a winger and
> overrated anyway and.. who's on the left?
...Emre? You know, the left footed midfielder they've just bought and you just mentioned?
> Newcastle's problem is with wingers. They've got what looks to be a
> very tasty partnership in Parker and Emre, but they're not too sharp
> on the wings. Jenas is more a central midfielder than a winger and
> overrated anyway and.. who's on the left?
...Emre? You know, the left footed midfielder they've just bought and you just mentioned?
Hehe :-)
I don't want any of my beloved Czechs at Newcastle. They'd get hooked on coke and start seeing brown people as the enemy.
Page: