The "Freeola Customer Forum" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
Love is just too complex to explain in words. Real love is wonderful, it's an emotion we all take for granted. Now, it's been said on here before that's it's over-used, and they were right. People can say that they love a nice cup of tea, but it doesn't make it true.
Back in October, my course did T.I.E and toured and performed to several secondary schools. We went to each school by minibus, and it was on one journey where I had a slight disagreement with the girl I like. I apologised, and she forgave me. I asked light-heartedly, "Do you still love me?". She replied with, "Love's a strong word, Hibernator". I thought about this, and now I stop over-using the word.
Meanwhile, over this last three weeks, the same girl has said she loves me two or three times. I'm not used to hearing the word directed at me apart from my mother or sister etc; and it honestly feels quite weird. While I don't take it to heart and think that it means something, it's made me question. I asked my friend Lucy yesterday if she loves her boyfriend, she said she didn't know, I comforted her with the "love's a strong word" malarchy. Then I told her I love her, and again felt awkward. I shouldn't, as it's just a word, but I do.
The point in this rant: You can say you love someone, and you can say someone is lovely... but they are two very different things.
Back in October, my course did T.I.E and toured and performed to several secondary schools. We went to each school by minibus, and it was on one journey where I had a slight disagreement with the girl I like. I apologised, and she forgave me. I asked light-heartedly, "Do you still love me?". She replied with, "Love's a strong word, Hibernator". I thought about this, and now I stop over-using the word.
Meanwhile, over this last three weeks, the same girl has said she loves me two or three times. I'm not used to hearing the word directed at me apart from my mother or sister etc; and it honestly feels quite weird. While I don't take it to heart and think that it means something, it's made me question. I asked my friend Lucy yesterday if she loves her boyfriend, she said she didn't know, I comforted her with the "love's a strong word" malarchy. Then I told her I love her, and again felt awkward. I shouldn't, as it's just a word, but I do.
The point in this rant: You can say you love someone, and you can say someone is lovely... but they are two very different things.
Page:
**gives up!!**
This topic was probably finished anyway! :-)
This topic was probably finished anyway! :-)
Celestine wrote:
> I'll give you credit for following along Panda. Wow. I'm impressed
> with that.
>
> But you're wrong.
>
> Thank you for disecting my words, as it seems a few take great
> pleasure in reading between the lines.
Am I? No. Sorry. Wailing about it isn't going to change the fact your accusing someone, and getting upset about, exactly the same as what you've done with Light.
I'm not "reading between the lines", simply making an observation. There's nothing more to it than that. I have no hidden agenda.
Bye for now. I've a hungry WoW pet to feed.
> I'll give you credit for following along Panda. Wow. I'm impressed
> with that.
>
> But you're wrong.
>
> Thank you for disecting my words, as it seems a few take great
> pleasure in reading between the lines.
Am I? No. Sorry. Wailing about it isn't going to change the fact your accusing someone, and getting upset about, exactly the same as what you've done with Light.
I'm not "reading between the lines", simply making an observation. There's nothing more to it than that. I have no hidden agenda.
Bye for now. I've a hungry WoW pet to feed.
Did someone say...BOOBIES?!
Pandaemonium wrote:
> Celestine wrote:
> I didn't go out of my way to do crap to Light. I talk to everyone
> the same around here and I'm consistent with the *hugs* thingy
> anyhoo.
>
> Celestine wrote:
> Although I knew that continuing in discussion with him would most
> likely irritate the bejesus out of him because he loves me to
> infinite depths..so, to that yes..I did purposefully, yet playfully,
> prod him.
>
> So you didn't jump into the "Why you should vote today"
> thread, make a personal attack on Light, then admit at the end of
> your post that you didn't even know what the thread was about?
>
> Gee, sorry, my mistake...
>
> In addition, you "followed him around the forum" simply to
> make a personal attack. Aren't you accusing Icarus of doing exactly
> the same? Hypocritical yes?
>
> I'm not attacking you here before you start, just making a couple of
> observations. Practise what you preach.
I'll give you credit for following along Panda. Wow. I'm impressed with that.
But you're wrong.
Thank you for disecting my words, as it seems a few take great pleasure in reading between the lines.
Initially...
> Celestine wrote:
> I didn't go out of my way to do crap to Light. I talk to everyone
> the same around here and I'm consistent with the *hugs* thingy
> anyhoo.
>
But then...
> Celestine wrote:
> Although I knew that continuing in discussion with him would most
> likely irritate the bejesus out of him because he loves me to
> infinite depths..so, to that yes..I did purposefully, yet playfully,
> prod him.
And I do practice what I preach. How's about you just stop making more of this than there is. All you're doing is complicating these matters.
If you can't be a part of the solution, you are a part of the problem.
If Icarus would like to continue his "bitter biatching," of which Grix himself called it, then I give him the floor..as I did Light.
No, I can't stop anyone from being an ass, if that's already all they are.
> Celestine wrote:
> I didn't go out of my way to do crap to Light. I talk to everyone
> the same around here and I'm consistent with the *hugs* thingy
> anyhoo.
>
> Celestine wrote:
> Although I knew that continuing in discussion with him would most
> likely irritate the bejesus out of him because he loves me to
> infinite depths..so, to that yes..I did purposefully, yet playfully,
> prod him.
>
> So you didn't jump into the "Why you should vote today"
> thread, make a personal attack on Light, then admit at the end of
> your post that you didn't even know what the thread was about?
>
> Gee, sorry, my mistake...
>
> In addition, you "followed him around the forum" simply to
> make a personal attack. Aren't you accusing Icarus of doing exactly
> the same? Hypocritical yes?
>
> I'm not attacking you here before you start, just making a couple of
> observations. Practise what you preach.
I'll give you credit for following along Panda. Wow. I'm impressed with that.
But you're wrong.
Thank you for disecting my words, as it seems a few take great pleasure in reading between the lines.
Initially...
> Celestine wrote:
> I didn't go out of my way to do crap to Light. I talk to everyone
> the same around here and I'm consistent with the *hugs* thingy
> anyhoo.
>
But then...
> Celestine wrote:
> Although I knew that continuing in discussion with him would most
> likely irritate the bejesus out of him because he loves me to
> infinite depths..so, to that yes..I did purposefully, yet playfully,
> prod him.
And I do practice what I preach. How's about you just stop making more of this than there is. All you're doing is complicating these matters.
If you can't be a part of the solution, you are a part of the problem.
If Icarus would like to continue his "bitter biatching," of which Grix himself called it, then I give him the floor..as I did Light.
No, I can't stop anyone from being an ass, if that's already all they are.
Strafio wrote:
> It was supposed to be a "humourous" way of saying "stop
> spamming this thread with off topic stuff", because yeah, it's
> annoying.
>
> Not that I can stop you or anything...
Aha. Sorry. I'm hungover and catankerous today. Fair do's, I've said my piece.
> It was supposed to be a "humourous" way of saying "stop
> spamming this thread with off topic stuff", because yeah, it's
> annoying.
>
> Not that I can stop you or anything...
Aha. Sorry. I'm hungover and catankerous today. Fair do's, I've said my piece.
It was supposed to be a "humourous" way of saying "stop spamming this thread with off topic stuff", because yeah, it's annoying.
Not that I can stop you or anything...
Not that I can stop you or anything...
Celestine wrote:
> I can't control anyone from becoming an ass, especially if that
> really all they are to begin with.
So I don't see the problem, you went out of your way to irrirate him, and you reaped what you sow.
> I can't control anyone from becoming an ass, especially if that
> really all they are to begin with.
So I don't see the problem, you went out of your way to irrirate him, and you reaped what you sow.
Strafio wrote:
> Oi! Pandy!
> [URL]http://ukchatforums.reserve.co.uk/display_messages.php?threadid=124581&forumid=4006[/URL]
> !
Awwww, how sweet. Upset because the ickle love thread is being distrupted.
Jesus christ...Grow some pips
> Oi! Pandy!
> [URL]http://ukchatforums.reserve.co.uk/display_messages.php?threadid=124581&forumid=4006[/URL]
> !
Awwww, how sweet. Upset because the ickle love thread is being distrupted.
Jesus christ...Grow some pips
Oi! Pandy! [URL]http://ukchatforums.reserve.co.uk/display_messages.php?threadid=124581&forumid=4006[/URL] !
Roughs as a badgers this morning. No need for that.
My previous post still stands.
My previous post still stands.
Page: