The "Freeola Customer Forum" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
I was reading in New Statesman Magazine... The recon that nearly 1/3 of the White British Population in the next General Election will vote either BNP or UKIP, as they believe that New Labour have given very little to the British People... instead more money goes to imigrants. Even today those 4 terrorists are being allowed back into the UK.. SCREW THAT... should have left them at Cuba. I'm not a facist, but I can see their point about controlling imigration, you have not got the slightest clue who the hell the people are coming in; they might bomb a school (like what happened in Russia), or commit acts of evil things against the British citizens.
Page:
Pandaemonium wrote:
> Light wrote:
> Heh. I do rather feel like his next insult will be along the lines
> of
> "You got a real purty mouth, city boy!"
>
> I mean, dear lord, he's throwing quite possibly the most childish and
> self embarassing insults around. It's like saying "yoore thee
> dum dum" to Jerry Saddowitz.
>
> I read the forus threads on the way in here. "Stupidest person
> in the world." and "kevstar" seemed to jump out at me.
And do you know what you are, Lights puppet on a string, you are a pubic hair on his left testical, the crack on his bum and the dry snot thats stuck up his nose. You are the fungis that gives him athletes foot, Pandaemonium, the last argument we had I remember you didn't reply too, was it cos you were stuck to the bottom of lights shoe at the time. For someone to mention my spelling, shall we read the forus Pandaemonium, and what should be after a full stop, look above.
> Light wrote:
> Heh. I do rather feel like his next insult will be along the lines
> of
> "You got a real purty mouth, city boy!"
>
> I mean, dear lord, he's throwing quite possibly the most childish and
> self embarassing insults around. It's like saying "yoore thee
> dum dum" to Jerry Saddowitz.
>
> I read the forus threads on the way in here. "Stupidest person
> in the world." and "kevstar" seemed to jump out at me.
And do you know what you are, Lights puppet on a string, you are a pubic hair on his left testical, the crack on his bum and the dry snot thats stuck up his nose. You are the fungis that gives him athletes foot, Pandaemonium, the last argument we had I remember you didn't reply too, was it cos you were stuck to the bottom of lights shoe at the time. For someone to mention my spelling, shall we read the forus Pandaemonium, and what should be after a full stop, look above.
Light wrote:
> kevstar wrote:
> The only quotes from the link that even remotely bore out any of his
> bigoted bilge. And he even misunderstood those.
>
>
> You really don't get it, do you? What I and basically everyone else
> is saying, is that it's impossible to say conclusively whether or not
> there is a problem with immigration based on the available figures.
The points I showed there are all flaws in the system, everyone of them. It wasn't just the odd few was it? no. With theese flaws in mind, it is possible to get a indication to where some of the problems are.
>
> You on the other hand are saying that there is definitely a problem
> with immigrants coming here, stealing our jobs, and also being on
> benefits (you still haven't spotted that contradiction have you?),
> despite your having no evidence for this. At all.
The evidence is obvious, everyone knows there's people abusing the system, no one knows how many true enough. However, just the fact that they know there is people abusing the system is evidence enough, would you not agree. Would you also not agree with the fact if they don't have accurate figures on the ammount coming in, then that too is a problem, and why not if not? Just the fact that the system is open to abuse indicates a problem, so yeahh, I would say there is defenatly a problem with immigration.
>
> So whilst everyone else here is accepting the need for a proper,
> rational debate supported by facts and figures, you are wailing about
> evil foreigners sponging off the state. In other words, you're being
> a cowardly, ignorant, xenophobic bigot.
People like me who have endured accusations of bigotry from light and others can certainly breathe a sigh of relief about now being able to write about the downsides of excessive immigration without any but the most dimwitted of left-wingers calling me racist, yes that you light.
>
> Oh, and you've avoided answering a single point put to you by gerrid
> or I in our last posts. Which sorta proves your cowardice, doesn't
> it?
Maybee because I was to busy insulting your Mrs.
> kevstar wrote:
> The only quotes from the link that even remotely bore out any of his
> bigoted bilge. And he even misunderstood those.
>
>
> You really don't get it, do you? What I and basically everyone else
> is saying, is that it's impossible to say conclusively whether or not
> there is a problem with immigration based on the available figures.
The points I showed there are all flaws in the system, everyone of them. It wasn't just the odd few was it? no. With theese flaws in mind, it is possible to get a indication to where some of the problems are.
>
> You on the other hand are saying that there is definitely a problem
> with immigrants coming here, stealing our jobs, and also being on
> benefits (you still haven't spotted that contradiction have you?),
> despite your having no evidence for this. At all.
The evidence is obvious, everyone knows there's people abusing the system, no one knows how many true enough. However, just the fact that they know there is people abusing the system is evidence enough, would you not agree. Would you also not agree with the fact if they don't have accurate figures on the ammount coming in, then that too is a problem, and why not if not? Just the fact that the system is open to abuse indicates a problem, so yeahh, I would say there is defenatly a problem with immigration.
>
> So whilst everyone else here is accepting the need for a proper,
> rational debate supported by facts and figures, you are wailing about
> evil foreigners sponging off the state. In other words, you're being
> a cowardly, ignorant, xenophobic bigot.
People like me who have endured accusations of bigotry from light and others can certainly breathe a sigh of relief about now being able to write about the downsides of excessive immigration without any but the most dimwitted of left-wingers calling me racist, yes that you light.
>
> Oh, and you've avoided answering a single point put to you by gerrid
> or I in our last posts. Which sorta proves your cowardice, doesn't
> it?
Maybee because I was to busy insulting your Mrs.
Light wrote:
> kevstar wrote:
>
> Who says your a stranger, or her, I've seen the pictures of you
> whilst in your house making her happy laughing at you. I'd rather
> sound pathetic that be pathetic ehh light, you know she only said
> that cos I told her I didn't want to satisfy someone with a hole the
> size of a wizards sleeve anymore don't you, or has she not told you
> yet? I'm glad you found it funny cos we did too, didn't we Mrs
> Light.
>
> Well, it was a nice effort to ignore the simple critique of your
> insult, but alas it didn't quite seem to work. For we are, of course,
> strangers to one another. I'm guessing that you think a mention of my
> girlfriend will enrage me in the same way that a mention of your
> family so clearly enraged you?
Naa not really, is that what you think, well you think a lot of things don't you, mainly daydreams, but still.
Hey, go for it; unlike you, I tend not
> to get upset at insults involving those close to me. Mainly because
> they always, without fail, centre around a "I'm so brilliant,
> and your loved ones prefer me to you" sort of theme, as in this
> case.And that always fills me with glee, because it invariably shows
> up the insecurities of the person doing the insulting. As you've
> never mentioned anything about having a girlfriend,
Your right I don't have a girlfriend, but I do have a fiance which I will be marrying in August this year, nice try, but don't bother.
I suspect we've
> hit upon the main source of yours here.
And what source is that then?
Incidentally, most people
> here have seen photo's of me; I've posted some up from plays I've
> been in. One of 'em was me in my pants. Do you have the nerve to do
> that kevstar...?
No because unlike you, i'm not stupid enough to show myself in pants to people I don't know you twit, yes light that gives you a lot of nerve but I don't know what your point is though, I mean what are you trying to say. I have played strip poker when I was 19 in front of my mates whilst drunk and later had group sex, have you got the nerve to do that?
>
> However, it's difficult to take such protestations seriously when
> they come from a man who's brain disorder has more personality than
> he does.
Thats actually quite good, however you know it's cos your scared of bieng wrong, have you ever heard of that word before light, wrong.
Doubly so when it's so appallingly spelled and poorly typed
> (why was that kevstar? Do you have difficulty typing through tears),
> and triply so when they're from a man named kevin. I mean Jesus, that
> name is a contraceptive in itself...
Hey, you don't need to be a good speller to get a point across do you light. Just like you don't need to a big sausage to make it taste nice do
you Light?
>
>
> Anyway, feel free to carry on allowing me to maul you in terms of
> insults; always good to keep in practice.
Go for it, because your insults so far have been so weak, i've actually sat there laughing at them. I mean come on, getting your wife to post something just shows how good you are at insults, doesn't it.
I thought you may like to
> know though that, by concentrating solely on insults and ignoring the
> actual issue we're debating, you have succeeded in proving me right
> about your cowardice. I mean hell, I managed to both insult
> and debate with you. Which just goes to show how much better I
> am than you.
Nice to know you actually thought they were insults, because I though they were nothing more than a weak attempt to try and embarass me, the reality was it just made me laugh at how stupid you are. And if you remember, it was you who first started the insulting. Anyway i'm quite happy to continue the subject of immigration if it makes you feel happy.
> kevstar wrote:
>
> Who says your a stranger, or her, I've seen the pictures of you
> whilst in your house making her happy laughing at you. I'd rather
> sound pathetic that be pathetic ehh light, you know she only said
> that cos I told her I didn't want to satisfy someone with a hole the
> size of a wizards sleeve anymore don't you, or has she not told you
> yet? I'm glad you found it funny cos we did too, didn't we Mrs
> Light.
>
> Well, it was a nice effort to ignore the simple critique of your
> insult, but alas it didn't quite seem to work. For we are, of course,
> strangers to one another. I'm guessing that you think a mention of my
> girlfriend will enrage me in the same way that a mention of your
> family so clearly enraged you?
Naa not really, is that what you think, well you think a lot of things don't you, mainly daydreams, but still.
Hey, go for it; unlike you, I tend not
> to get upset at insults involving those close to me. Mainly because
> they always, without fail, centre around a "I'm so brilliant,
> and your loved ones prefer me to you" sort of theme, as in this
> case.And that always fills me with glee, because it invariably shows
> up the insecurities of the person doing the insulting. As you've
> never mentioned anything about having a girlfriend,
Your right I don't have a girlfriend, but I do have a fiance which I will be marrying in August this year, nice try, but don't bother.
I suspect we've
> hit upon the main source of yours here.
And what source is that then?
Incidentally, most people
> here have seen photo's of me; I've posted some up from plays I've
> been in. One of 'em was me in my pants. Do you have the nerve to do
> that kevstar...?
No because unlike you, i'm not stupid enough to show myself in pants to people I don't know you twit, yes light that gives you a lot of nerve but I don't know what your point is though, I mean what are you trying to say. I have played strip poker when I was 19 in front of my mates whilst drunk and later had group sex, have you got the nerve to do that?
>
> However, it's difficult to take such protestations seriously when
> they come from a man who's brain disorder has more personality than
> he does.
Thats actually quite good, however you know it's cos your scared of bieng wrong, have you ever heard of that word before light, wrong.
Doubly so when it's so appallingly spelled and poorly typed
> (why was that kevstar? Do you have difficulty typing through tears),
> and triply so when they're from a man named kevin. I mean Jesus, that
> name is a contraceptive in itself...
Hey, you don't need to be a good speller to get a point across do you light. Just like you don't need to a big sausage to make it taste nice do
you Light?
>
>
> Anyway, feel free to carry on allowing me to maul you in terms of
> insults; always good to keep in practice.
Go for it, because your insults so far have been so weak, i've actually sat there laughing at them. I mean come on, getting your wife to post something just shows how good you are at insults, doesn't it.
I thought you may like to
> know though that, by concentrating solely on insults and ignoring the
> actual issue we're debating, you have succeeded in proving me right
> about your cowardice. I mean hell, I managed to both insult
> and debate with you. Which just goes to show how much better I
> am than you.
Nice to know you actually thought they were insults, because I though they were nothing more than a weak attempt to try and embarass me, the reality was it just made me laugh at how stupid you are. And if you remember, it was you who first started the insulting. Anyway i'm quite happy to continue the subject of immigration if it makes you feel happy.
Timmargh wrote:
> And Jerry Sadowitz was the only reason I ever watched Channel 5 -
> they should bring him back.
D'you remember his BBC2 show, The PallBearers Revue? Any idea if that's been released on video or DVD?
> And Jerry Sadowitz was the only reason I ever watched Channel 5 -
> they should bring him back.
D'you remember his BBC2 show, The PallBearers Revue? Any idea if that's been released on video or DVD?
Kevstar for notable!!111!!111
And Jerry Sadowitz was the only reason I ever watched Channel 5 - they should bring him back.
And Jerry Sadowitz was the only reason I ever watched Channel 5 - they should bring him back.
Light wrote:
> God, I DREAM of being as caustic as Sadowitz! He truly is the Hero of
> Hate.
Heh. Another comic recommendation for you then.
"Fun with Milk and Cheese" [URL]http://www.amazon.co.uk/exec/obidos/ASIN/0943151074/qid=1108133237/ref=sr_8_xs_ap_i1_xgl/202-1287466-5125412[/URL]
3.73 new via marketplace, go on, you know you want too.
> God, I DREAM of being as caustic as Sadowitz! He truly is the Hero of
> Hate.
Heh. Another comic recommendation for you then.
"Fun with Milk and Cheese" [URL]http://www.amazon.co.uk/exec/obidos/ASIN/0943151074/qid=1108133237/ref=sr_8_xs_ap_i1_xgl/202-1287466-5125412[/URL]
3.73 new via marketplace, go on, you know you want too.
Pandaemonium wrote:
> I mean, dear lord, he's throwing quite possibly the most childish and
> self embarassing insults around.
I know, but bless his little cotton socks for trying. I mean, he's going to need to work on his insults for when he spends his sick leave going to ferry terminals and shouting at foreigners.
> It's like saying "yoore thee
> dum dum" to Jerry Saddowitz.
God, I DREAM of being as caustic as Sadowitz! He truly is the Hero of Hate.
> I mean, dear lord, he's throwing quite possibly the most childish and
> self embarassing insults around.
I know, but bless his little cotton socks for trying. I mean, he's going to need to work on his insults for when he spends his sick leave going to ferry terminals and shouting at foreigners.
> It's like saying "yoore thee
> dum dum" to Jerry Saddowitz.
God, I DREAM of being as caustic as Sadowitz! He truly is the Hero of Hate.
Light wrote:
> Heh. I do rather feel like his next insult will be along the lines of
> "You got a real purty mouth, city boy!"
I mean, dear lord, he's throwing quite possibly the most childish and self embarassing insults around. It's like saying "yoore thee dum dum" to Jerry Saddowitz.
I read the forus threads on the way in here. "Stupidest person in the world." and "kevstar" seemed to jump out at me.
> Heh. I do rather feel like his next insult will be along the lines of
> "You got a real purty mouth, city boy!"
I mean, dear lord, he's throwing quite possibly the most childish and self embarassing insults around. It's like saying "yoore thee dum dum" to Jerry Saddowitz.
I read the forus threads on the way in here. "Stupidest person in the world." and "kevstar" seemed to jump out at me.
Heh. I do rather feel like his next insult will be along the lines of "You got a real purty mouth, city boy!"
[URL]http://images.amazon.com/images/P/B000002KEL.01.LZZZZZZZ.jpg[/URL]
Page: