The "Freeola Customer Forum" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
I was reading in New Statesman Magazine... The recon that nearly 1/3 of the White British Population in the next General Election will vote either BNP or UKIP, as they believe that New Labour have given very little to the British People... instead more money goes to imigrants. Even today those 4 terrorists are being allowed back into the UK.. SCREW THAT... should have left them at Cuba. I'm not a facist, but I can see their point about controlling imigration, you have not got the slightest clue who the hell the people are coming in; they might bomb a school (like what happened in Russia), or commit acts of evil things against the British citizens.
Page:
kevstar wrote:
> Who says your a stranger, or her, I've seen the pictures of you
> whilst in your house making her happy laughing at you. I'd rather
> sound pathetic that be pathetic ehh light, you know she only said
> that cos I told her I didn't want to satisfy someone with a hole the
> size of a wizards sleeve anymore don't you, or has she not told you
> yet? I'm glad you found it funny cos we did too, didn't we Mrs Light.
Well, it was a nice effort to ignore the simple critique of your insult, but alas it didn't quite seem to work. For we are, of course, strangers to one another. I'm guessing that you think a mention of my girlfriend will enrage me in the same way that a mention of your family so clearly enraged you? Hey, go for it; unlike you, I tend not to get upset at insults involving those close to me. Mainly because they always, without fail, centre around a "I'm so brilliant, and your loved ones prefer me to you" sort of theme, as in this case. And that always fills me with glee, because it invariably shows up the insecurities of the person doing the insulting. As you've never mentioned anything about having a girlfriend, I suspect we've hit upon the main source of yours here. Incidentally, most people here have seen photo's of me; I've posted some up from plays I've been in. One of 'em was me in my pants. Do you have the nerve to do that kevstar...?
However, it's difficult to take such protestations seriously when they come from a man who's brain disorder has more personality than he does. Doubly so when it's so appallingly spelled and poorly typed (why was that kevstar? Do you have difficulty typing through tears), and triply so when they're from a man named kevin. I mean Jesus, that name is a contraceptive in itself...
Anyway, feel free to carry on allowing me to maul you in terms of insults; always good to keep in practice. I thought you may like to know though that, by concentrating solely on insults and ignoring the actual issue we're debating, you have succeeded in proving me right about your cowardice. I mean hell, I managed to both insult and debate with you. Which just goes to show how much better I am than you.
> Who says your a stranger, or her, I've seen the pictures of you
> whilst in your house making her happy laughing at you. I'd rather
> sound pathetic that be pathetic ehh light, you know she only said
> that cos I told her I didn't want to satisfy someone with a hole the
> size of a wizards sleeve anymore don't you, or has she not told you
> yet? I'm glad you found it funny cos we did too, didn't we Mrs Light.
Well, it was a nice effort to ignore the simple critique of your insult, but alas it didn't quite seem to work. For we are, of course, strangers to one another. I'm guessing that you think a mention of my girlfriend will enrage me in the same way that a mention of your family so clearly enraged you? Hey, go for it; unlike you, I tend not to get upset at insults involving those close to me. Mainly because they always, without fail, centre around a "I'm so brilliant, and your loved ones prefer me to you" sort of theme, as in this case. And that always fills me with glee, because it invariably shows up the insecurities of the person doing the insulting. As you've never mentioned anything about having a girlfriend, I suspect we've hit upon the main source of yours here. Incidentally, most people here have seen photo's of me; I've posted some up from plays I've been in. One of 'em was me in my pants. Do you have the nerve to do that kevstar...?
However, it's difficult to take such protestations seriously when they come from a man who's brain disorder has more personality than he does. Doubly so when it's so appallingly spelled and poorly typed (why was that kevstar? Do you have difficulty typing through tears), and triply so when they're from a man named kevin. I mean Jesus, that name is a contraceptive in itself...
Anyway, feel free to carry on allowing me to maul you in terms of insults; always good to keep in practice. I thought you may like to know though that, by concentrating solely on insults and ignoring the actual issue we're debating, you have succeeded in proving me right about your cowardice. I mean hell, I managed to both insult and debate with you. Which just goes to show how much better I am than you.
Light wrote:
> kevstar wrote:
>
>
> Hmmm I don't think so, first of all tell your Mrs that I left my
> boxers at your house for me will you, you should find them under the
> pillow on your bed. She came to me when she mentioned how she needed
> a man who could satisfy her properly, no offence but; I obliged. So
> I
> gave her a good roasting, meat and 2 veg and a splash of gravy at
> the
> end. She swallowed the lot of course, apart from the little bit
> which
> dribbled down her chin and in the cereal box, not hungry are you?
>
> So now i've given your Mrs a leason in how to please a woman, she
> may
> give you a few tips given by the kevstar, enjoy them, i'm sure you
> will.
>
> Mwahahahahaaaa! I've told my missus all of that, and I thought I'd
> post her response;
>
> "Hmm? Oh, kevstar? Yes, I remember him; he was the guy whom I
> went to visit as part of my Care in the Community (shagging) program.
> It was a sad case really; seeing him sat there in semen-crusted
> underwear (I assume it was his own semen, but you never know) talking
> about how he was going to "roast" me. I mean, I pointed out
> to him that you need two men in order to give a woman a roasting, but
> he seemed to think that his imaginary friend, Harvey, would be able
> to join in.
>
> Anyway, I did my best to pleasure him but unfortunately he just could
> get it up. We settled for using a lollypop stick as a splint but,
> frankly, it just wasn't worth the effort. Then I told him to imagine
> I was his sister; that finally did the trick. It was a bit wierd when
> he started making monkey noises and saying "Who's your black
> boyfriend baby?"
>
>
> Heh. A tip kevstar; when insulting strangers on the internet,
> bragging about yourself makes you sound REALLY pathetic. Especially
> when you're sat at home browsing internet porn for biracial stuff in
> order to fuel your hatred of foreigners, 'kay?
Who says your a stranger, or her, I've seen the pictures of you whilst in your house making her happy laughing at you. I'd rather sound pathetic that be pathetic ehh light, you know she only said that cos I told her I didn't want to satisfy someone with a hole the size of a wizards sleeve anymore don't you, or has she not told you yet? I'm glad you found it funny cos we did too, didn't we Mrs Light.
> kevstar wrote:
>
>
> Hmmm I don't think so, first of all tell your Mrs that I left my
> boxers at your house for me will you, you should find them under the
> pillow on your bed. She came to me when she mentioned how she needed
> a man who could satisfy her properly, no offence but; I obliged. So
> I
> gave her a good roasting, meat and 2 veg and a splash of gravy at
> the
> end. She swallowed the lot of course, apart from the little bit
> which
> dribbled down her chin and in the cereal box, not hungry are you?
>
> So now i've given your Mrs a leason in how to please a woman, she
> may
> give you a few tips given by the kevstar, enjoy them, i'm sure you
> will.
>
> Mwahahahahaaaa! I've told my missus all of that, and I thought I'd
> post her response;
>
> "Hmm? Oh, kevstar? Yes, I remember him; he was the guy whom I
> went to visit as part of my Care in the Community (shagging) program.
> It was a sad case really; seeing him sat there in semen-crusted
> underwear (I assume it was his own semen, but you never know) talking
> about how he was going to "roast" me. I mean, I pointed out
> to him that you need two men in order to give a woman a roasting, but
> he seemed to think that his imaginary friend, Harvey, would be able
> to join in.
>
> Anyway, I did my best to pleasure him but unfortunately he just could
> get it up. We settled for using a lollypop stick as a splint but,
> frankly, it just wasn't worth the effort. Then I told him to imagine
> I was his sister; that finally did the trick. It was a bit wierd when
> he started making monkey noises and saying "Who's your black
> boyfriend baby?"
>
>
> Heh. A tip kevstar; when insulting strangers on the internet,
> bragging about yourself makes you sound REALLY pathetic. Especially
> when you're sat at home browsing internet porn for biracial stuff in
> order to fuel your hatred of foreigners, 'kay?
Who says your a stranger, or her, I've seen the pictures of you whilst in your house making her happy laughing at you. I'd rather sound pathetic that be pathetic ehh light, you know she only said that cos I told her I didn't want to satisfy someone with a hole the size of a wizards sleeve anymore don't you, or has she not told you yet? I'm glad you found it funny cos we did too, didn't we Mrs Light.
Your Honour wrote:
> Geee, thanks very much.
Hey, any time. I thought it'd be nice to put your mind at rest seeing as you seem to be paranoid that you're gonna get yelled at for, well, all the reasons Kevstar is getting pulled apart.
>
> Yes, I do. Also, I have not "Blared a solution out"
> as, quite frankly, I don't have one. But while we still have people
> doing this sort of thing
> [URL]http://www.sky.com/skynews/article/0,,30100-13298605,00.html[/URL]
> a solution will be hard to find.
It'll be hard to find, yeah. All problems present difficulties. But that's no reason to say "So therefore, lets keep out the darkies" (and that, by the way, was directed at kevstar. Just to save on your sensitivites, of which you seem to have many today).
> Yes. A system which, in my view, seems to have been taken over by
> lots of "do goody goody" types (for wont of a better
> phrase), who have set up a welfare system that seems to be easy to
> abuse.
You ARE joking, right? Did you see what happened to the social security system in the 80's!? It's easy enough for a determined fraudster yes, but...well, when it's difficult enough for genuine claimants to actually get any money out of the welfare system I tend to think you're only looking on one side of the debate. Yeah, the system needs to have fraud cut out of it. But it also needs to be made a LOT fairer.
> Geee, thanks very much.
Hey, any time. I thought it'd be nice to put your mind at rest seeing as you seem to be paranoid that you're gonna get yelled at for, well, all the reasons Kevstar is getting pulled apart.
>
> Yes, I do. Also, I have not "Blared a solution out"
> as, quite frankly, I don't have one. But while we still have people
> doing this sort of thing
> [URL]http://www.sky.com/skynews/article/0,,30100-13298605,00.html[/URL]
> a solution will be hard to find.
It'll be hard to find, yeah. All problems present difficulties. But that's no reason to say "So therefore, lets keep out the darkies" (and that, by the way, was directed at kevstar. Just to save on your sensitivites, of which you seem to have many today).
> Yes. A system which, in my view, seems to have been taken over by
> lots of "do goody goody" types (for wont of a better
> phrase), who have set up a welfare system that seems to be easy to
> abuse.
You ARE joking, right? Did you see what happened to the social security system in the 80's!? It's easy enough for a determined fraudster yes, but...well, when it's difficult enough for genuine claimants to actually get any money out of the welfare system I tend to think you're only looking on one side of the debate. Yeah, the system needs to have fraud cut out of it. But it also needs to be made a LOT fairer.
A welfare system is fantastic.
Some abuse it, some don't, regardless of who they are and where they came from.
Jump on the merry-go round with me!
Some abuse it, some don't, regardless of who they are and where they came from.
Jump on the merry-go round with me!
Light wrote:
> Nah, I won't. I only do that when it's obvious that someone is
> motivated by xenophobia.
Geee, thanks very much.
> You're right; there are undoubtedly some. But don't you think it
> would make more sense to establish exactly what the extent of the
> problem is and how to deal with it before blaring a solution at the
> top of our lungs?
Yes, I do. Also, I have not "Blared a solution out" as, quite frankly, I don't have one. But while we still have people doing this sort of thing [URL]http://www.sky.com/skynews/article/0,,30100-13298605,00.html[/URL] a solution will be hard to find.
>
> So you're basically talking about all abuses of the welfare system,
> as opposed to saying that the main problem is immigrants? M'kay;
> can't really argue about that.
Yes. A system which, in my view, seems to have been taken over by lots of "do goody goody" types (for wont of a better phrase), who have set up a welfare system that seems to be easy to abuse.
> Nah, I won't. I only do that when it's obvious that someone is
> motivated by xenophobia.
Geee, thanks very much.
> You're right; there are undoubtedly some. But don't you think it
> would make more sense to establish exactly what the extent of the
> problem is and how to deal with it before blaring a solution at the
> top of our lungs?
Yes, I do. Also, I have not "Blared a solution out" as, quite frankly, I don't have one. But while we still have people doing this sort of thing [URL]http://www.sky.com/skynews/article/0,,30100-13298605,00.html[/URL] a solution will be hard to find.
>
> So you're basically talking about all abuses of the welfare system,
> as opposed to saying that the main problem is immigrants? M'kay;
> can't really argue about that.
Yes. A system which, in my view, seems to have been taken over by lots of "do goody goody" types (for wont of a better phrase), who have set up a welfare system that seems to be easy to abuse.
Why suddenly in the past few years or so are people so ready to combat the wrongly percieved immage of 'The Flood of criminals and Leaches', when for decades, home bread scum remains un-checked by a great many of us? How many of those BNP and UKIP nitwits are law abiding? Im specifically reffering to the BNP thugs... Yeah, they are so much better that everybody else arn't they. Angels with Dirty Faces i think not. More like scum with anti-asylum/immigration war paint.
Your Honour wrote:
> 'They' are bogus asylum seekers who are coming over here to see what
> they can get for nothing. Now no doubt you and Goaty will think I'm
> some "Darkie hating ... etc etc", but the fact remains that
> we have bogus asylum seekers who we are funding.
Nah, I won't. I only do that when it's obvious that someone is motivated by xenophobia.
You're right; there are undoubtedly some. But don't you think it would make more sense to establish exactly what the extent of the problem is and how to deal with it before blaring a solution at the top of our lungs? After all, a large number of "bogus" immigrants (and I include both economic migrants and asylum seelers here) end up working as virtual slaves, so it's in their best interests to sort the system out too. But at the moment, we have no clue how to do that, correct?
> As I've said before, I'm not talking about immigration. Immigration
> is something I have no problem with. What annoys me are bogus asylum
> seekers, and "native white-ys" who take advantage of the
> benefit system we have in this country.
So you're basically talking about all abuses of the welfare system, as opposed to saying that the main problem is immigrants? M'kay; can't really argue about that.
> 'They' are bogus asylum seekers who are coming over here to see what
> they can get for nothing. Now no doubt you and Goaty will think I'm
> some "Darkie hating ... etc etc", but the fact remains that
> we have bogus asylum seekers who we are funding.
Nah, I won't. I only do that when it's obvious that someone is motivated by xenophobia.
You're right; there are undoubtedly some. But don't you think it would make more sense to establish exactly what the extent of the problem is and how to deal with it before blaring a solution at the top of our lungs? After all, a large number of "bogus" immigrants (and I include both economic migrants and asylum seelers here) end up working as virtual slaves, so it's in their best interests to sort the system out too. But at the moment, we have no clue how to do that, correct?
> As I've said before, I'm not talking about immigration. Immigration
> is something I have no problem with. What annoys me are bogus asylum
> seekers, and "native white-ys" who take advantage of the
> benefit system we have in this country.
So you're basically talking about all abuses of the welfare system, as opposed to saying that the main problem is immigrants? M'kay; can't really argue about that.
Light wrote:
> Your Honour wrote:
> Who are 'they' and how are 'they' taking advantage of the system?
'They' are bogus asylum seekers who are coming over here to see what they can get for nothing. Now no doubt you and Goaty will think I'm some "Darkie hating ... etc etc", but the fact remains that we have bogus asylum seekers who we are funding.
> Well...how do you propose we pay for that when our workforce is
> aging, and we're not getting enough people to replace 'em with
> immigration?
As I've said before, I'm not talking about immigration. Immigration is something I have no problem with. What annoys me are bogus asylum seekers, and "native white-ys" who take advantage of the benefit system we have in this country.
> Your Honour wrote:
> Who are 'they' and how are 'they' taking advantage of the system?
'They' are bogus asylum seekers who are coming over here to see what they can get for nothing. Now no doubt you and Goaty will think I'm some "Darkie hating ... etc etc", but the fact remains that we have bogus asylum seekers who we are funding.
> Well...how do you propose we pay for that when our workforce is
> aging, and we're not getting enough people to replace 'em with
> immigration?
As I've said before, I'm not talking about immigration. Immigration is something I have no problem with. What annoys me are bogus asylum seekers, and "native white-ys" who take advantage of the benefit system we have in this country.
Do 'abuse' the system, as was the case in the first place with the immigrants?
Your Honour wrote:
> They're not abusing the system. They are taking advantage (and fair
> play to them) of a system that, in my view, is balanced incorrectly.
Who are 'they' and how are 'they' taking advantage of the system?
>
> Should we not try to get our country in a slightly better state
> first? Such as transport, national health, teaching, homeless people
> etc etc.
Well...how do you propose we pay for that when our workforce is aging, and we're not getting enough people to replace 'em with immigration?
> They're not abusing the system. They are taking advantage (and fair
> play to them) of a system that, in my view, is balanced incorrectly.
Who are 'they' and how are 'they' taking advantage of the system?
>
> Should we not try to get our country in a slightly better state
> first? Such as transport, national health, teaching, homeless people
> etc etc.
Well...how do you propose we pay for that when our workforce is aging, and we're not getting enough people to replace 'em with immigration?
Page: