The "Freeola Customer Forum" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
Well, i have to say that this was a marvellously entertaining film, i held off going for a pee until my hands went numb, but i still felt a little let down.
This film is by far the most removed from the book, and i think the spirit of the film suffers for it. Having Sam leave Frodo seemed to add an unneccesary complexity to the tale, and as for Gollum trying to poison Frodo against Sam i thought it a bit pointless.
But still, the battles are incredible, almost rousing me out of my seat to shout a battle cry. But then they made it look like minas tirith was made out of Lego, and if the first 5 minutes of the siege of Minas Tirith were anything to go by, the city should have been levelled in half an hour at most.
I could rant on about the various bits of the book that were left out, but it would take some space, and if the film is still good anyway, then whats the point?
Oh, and take some tissues, there were quite a few people who were left blubbing.
This film is by far the most removed from the book, and i think the spirit of the film suffers for it. Having Sam leave Frodo seemed to add an unneccesary complexity to the tale, and as for Gollum trying to poison Frodo against Sam i thought it a bit pointless.
But still, the battles are incredible, almost rousing me out of my seat to shout a battle cry. But then they made it look like minas tirith was made out of Lego, and if the first 5 minutes of the siege of Minas Tirith were anything to go by, the city should have been levelled in half an hour at most.
I could rant on about the various bits of the book that were left out, but it would take some space, and if the film is still good anyway, then whats the point?
Oh, and take some tissues, there were quite a few people who were left blubbing.
Page:
Vice wrote:
> prolly summink to do with feminist you know how everything has to be
> politically correct nowadays
--
Try reading the books. Eowyn kills the Witch-King in the books. Retard.
> prolly summink to do with feminist you know how everything has to be
> politically correct nowadays
--
Try reading the books. Eowyn kills the Witch-King in the books. Retard.
Darwock wrote:
> What are you talking about? Frodo does leave Sam and Gollum does
> poison them against each other in the book.
Dont talk rubbish. They both entered Shelobs lair together in the book, and Gollum never went out of his way to make Frodo distrust Sam either.
> What are you talking about? Frodo does leave Sam and Gollum does
> poison them against each other in the book.
Dont talk rubbish. They both entered Shelobs lair together in the book, and Gollum never went out of his way to make Frodo distrust Sam either.
May go and see it again tomorrow. Seeing it at least three times as I'm going with my Dad, girlfriend and mate.
OK, well it's been 12 years since I last read the books but I'm SURE I remember Frodo and Sam separating, and I definitely remember Gandalf and the Witch King having a showdown...
Merry kills the Witchking in the books.
Treebeard kills the Witch King actually.
No, sorry I lied it was Saruman who killed the Witch King.
Spastics.
Right....
Either I'm missing the joke or that guy has multiple accounts, which he tried to use to make himself sound clever and funny.
Page: