The "Freeola Customer Forum" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
I have something to say to all you non-God types..
1. God does exsist, He created you, He can destroy you
2. Ya know the 'Big Bang' theory? Me and my mom belive it, So? What if God made noise while he created Earth, no one is silent
3. Why are you even bringing this subject up? It's pointless and you'll never win...
-God Bless, I'm prayin' for ya!
PS:God exists, you know it! Don't deny it! He has done something for you in the past so be thankfull there is a God
taken from: letssingit.com
1. God does exsist, He created you, He can destroy you
2. Ya know the 'Big Bang' theory? Me and my mom belive it, So? What if God made noise while he created Earth, no one is silent
3. Why are you even bringing this subject up? It's pointless and you'll never win...
-God Bless, I'm prayin' for ya!
PS:God exists, you know it! Don't deny it! He has done something for you in the past so be thankfull there is a God
taken from: letssingit.com
Page:
> Gangsta Hamsta wrote:
> I have read reports and books by the most well
> recognised scientists and the world and all admit there is no proof
> for evolution.
Try Wonderful Life, by Stephen Jay Gould
> I have read reports and books by the most well
> recognised scientists and the world and all admit there is no proof
> for evolution.
Try Wonderful Life, by Stephen Jay Gould
Mendax Bartender wrote:
Nicely put. Better than I put it, and I wholly agree.
(this is fun!)
Nicely put. Better than I put it, and I wholly agree.
(this is fun!)
Slaveunit wrote:
> I thought that God portrayed himself as the only God, which would mean
> that anyone believing in him would have to call the rest liars by
> default?
--
Yes, but once again someone is taking their belief and actually applying it to real world situations.
Always a problem.
> I thought that God portrayed himself as the only God, which would mean
> that anyone believing in him would have to call the rest liars by
> default?
--
Yes, but once again someone is taking their belief and actually applying it to real world situations.
Always a problem.
Gangsta Hamsta wrote:
I would believe in evolution if there were proof.
Dinasaurs.
I would believe in evolution if there were proof.
Dinasaurs.
Goatboy wrote:
> What about Buddhists? Jehova Witnesses? Hindus? Etc etc? There sure
> are a lot of Gods, and if you believe he exists,then you have to
> accept the notion that he exists for the other denominations.
I thought that God portrayed himself as the only God, which would mean that anyone believing in him would have to call the rest liars by default?
> What about Buddhists? Jehova Witnesses? Hindus? Etc etc? There sure
> are a lot of Gods, and if you believe he exists,then you have to
> accept the notion that he exists for the other denominations.
I thought that God portrayed himself as the only God, which would mean that anyone believing in him would have to call the rest liars by default?
Gangsta Hamsta wrote:
> I refuse to believe that life, the universe etc came about by chance
So, you're using the classic (and dumb) argument that we are too complex to have evolved naturally. Yet some far more complex and capable creature, that can shape stars and worlds from nothing, and create life and shape it on a whim, is omnipotent, omnipresent and immortal could have just appeared out of the blue, to shape a semi-intelligent race of bipedal mammals intent on blowing each other up with increasingly inventive and inhumane forms of destruction?
I hope against hope that you see where that argument is flawed.
> I refuse to believe that life, the universe etc came about by chance
So, you're using the classic (and dumb) argument that we are too complex to have evolved naturally. Yet some far more complex and capable creature, that can shape stars and worlds from nothing, and create life and shape it on a whim, is omnipotent, omnipresent and immortal could have just appeared out of the blue, to shape a semi-intelligent race of bipedal mammals intent on blowing each other up with increasingly inventive and inhumane forms of destruction?
I hope against hope that you see where that argument is flawed.
Gangsta Hamsta wrote:
I have read reports and books by the most well
> recognised scientists and the world and all admit there is no proof
> for evolution.
---
Which ones? C'mon, show me the monkey.
I have read reports and books by the most well
> recognised scientists and the world and all admit there is no proof
> for evolution.
---
Which ones? C'mon, show me the monkey.
Slaveunit wrote:
> Now, Did it happen by evolution, or did this magical being that
> preceeds time click his fingers and make the universe exist?
I would believe in evolution if there were proof. And there is not.
They constantly talk about 'the missing link' etc and claim to have found different proof. I have read reports and books by the most well recognised scientists and the world and all admit there is no proof for evolution.
"It is the arrogance of mankind to refuse to believe in something greater than he"
> Now, Did it happen by evolution, or did this magical being that
> preceeds time click his fingers and make the universe exist?
I would believe in evolution if there were proof. And there is not.
They constantly talk about 'the missing link' etc and claim to have found different proof. I have read reports and books by the most well recognised scientists and the world and all admit there is no proof for evolution.
"It is the arrogance of mankind to refuse to believe in something greater than he"
Mendax Bartender wrote:
The only person who is going to agree that Goatboy is God is Goatboy,
> and even then perhaps not. That. Was. A. Joke.
---
But you said I was....
*sulks off towards the door*
I had a compound and everything.
The only person who is going to agree that Goatboy is God is Goatboy,
> and even then perhaps not. That. Was. A. Joke.
---
But you said I was....
*sulks off towards the door*
I had a compound and everything.
GAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAH
That's what I'm saying.
"In my opinion" doesn't make it so.
You dont know if God exists, I dont know that God doesn't
Wars are fought, books are burned, religious people are persecuted for that very reason.
All it is? Opinions. Until either God comes down and reveals himself, or science proves beyond all measure that religion is ancient superstition?
You dont know. I dont know. Nobody knows. Which is where faith comes in. But faith is still an opinion, nothing more.
I'm not dismissing anyone for religious beliefs, but you simply cannot proclaim your opinion to be the one true version.
What about Buddhists? Jehova Witnesses? Hindus? Etc etc? There sure are a lot of Gods, and if you believe he exists,then you have to accept the notion that he exists for the other denominations.
This is a silly argument, but amusing.
Just dont confuse opinion with fact
That's what I'm saying.
"In my opinion" doesn't make it so.
You dont know if God exists, I dont know that God doesn't
Wars are fought, books are burned, religious people are persecuted for that very reason.
All it is? Opinions. Until either God comes down and reveals himself, or science proves beyond all measure that religion is ancient superstition?
You dont know. I dont know. Nobody knows. Which is where faith comes in. But faith is still an opinion, nothing more.
I'm not dismissing anyone for religious beliefs, but you simply cannot proclaim your opinion to be the one true version.
What about Buddhists? Jehova Witnesses? Hindus? Etc etc? There sure are a lot of Gods, and if you believe he exists,then you have to accept the notion that he exists for the other denominations.
This is a silly argument, but amusing.
Just dont confuse opinion with fact
Page: