The "Nintendo Games" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
Personally, if Rare announced today that all their future titles will be on X-Box, I wouldn't rush out and buy one tomorrow. For me, the X-Box really is very unappealing. I used to want Halo, but seeing as it's now coming out on PC, I'm not bothered about that. There are no games I want, I curse that 'controller' and it's just so damn ugly! (Those are all my own opinions, so no X-Box fanboys please).
I tells ya, Rare's games would have to be REALLY special for me to buy an X-Box, and even then, I'd wait till it's reduced to about £100.
I tells ya, Rare's games would have to be REALLY special for me to buy an X-Box, and even then, I'd wait till it's reduced to about £100.
Page:
but it would sink
and if it didn't i wud use a PS2 as an ORE
and if it didn't i wud use a PS2 as an ORE
ok then i might sink so i woiuld use it as boster steat for little people
very good idea
at last i have found a product that helps the little people
Strafex wrote:
> 160 is a VERY good price to get a console at.
> I was willing to pay 200 for the Gamecube, and that was without the
> DVD, hardrive, etc...
But if you take away all the fancy numbers, and the unecessary extras that up the price, what do you have? A bunch of under-par, poor games. And I'm not paying £160.00 for that.
> 160 is a VERY good price to get a console at.
> I was willing to pay 200 for the Gamecube, and that was without the
> DVD, hardrive, etc...
But if you take away all the fancy numbers, and the unecessary extras that up the price, what do you have? A bunch of under-par, poor games. And I'm not paying £160.00 for that.
Page: