The "Nintendo Games" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
I tells ya, Rare's games would have to be REALLY special for me to buy an X-Box, and even then, I'd wait till it's reduced to about £100.
> If they get Conker then yes because Conker is my most favourite game.
> But they make nothing else that I couldn't live without.
Who says the next one will be as good as the first?
Everyone is talking on the grounds of games before them, yeah sure if they were multi format company and showed they can make brilliant games on every console then yeah it would be ok.
But they havent developed on their own on the GC, let alone the XBox.
Even if they were making games on the xbox now and they were all brilliant whos to say a sequal of a game on there already is going to be that good?
Im not saying that you shouldnt look foward to games, but only when its been released in japan or USA and then it has people WHO HAVE PLAYED ON IT, saying its good.
It's going to take more than a few games.
> No way will I get an X-Box just because of Rare. At £160.00 it's
> still shockingly expensive and does not appeal to me in the slightest.
160 is a VERY good price to get a console at.
I was willing to pay 200 for the Gamecube, and that was without the DVD, hardrive, etc...
Still, if we boycott it a little longer, we could force MS to cut it even further.
If we can get them to cut it down to 100 pounds with Halo, THAT would be worth it, even if you already have a Gamecube.
> NEVER, I SHALL NEVER BUY OR EVEN GET GIVEN AN X BOX
so if you get given one you will not take it. dont be so stupid