The "General Games Chat" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
Bollards.
Why can't you see it's exactly the same as the DualShock 2 but with less features? Let's run through this:
· D-pad - check
· Two analog sticks - check
· Four main buttons - check
· Shoulder buttons - check
· Rumble - nope
· Full analog on ALL buttons - nope
· 4 shoulder buttons - nope
· Analog sticks as sensitive as the DualShock 2 - nope
· Ability to drop for storeys and still work perfectly - nope
Excuse me if I'm wrong but surely if it's the SAME shape with the SAME layout but with less functions, that makes it worse? Oh no, sorry, I'm missing out the facts that it's purple and made by Nintendo, that automatically makes it far superior, I'm terribly sorry.
I dare any of you to prove to me that the GameCube controller is better than the DualShock 2 - and saying that "it's more comfortable" is a cop-out.
If that is what you are talking about.
A PC is hardly lounge compatable
They're not the pincale of stability
They have horrific control systems
They cost an absolute bomb.
As I said, life's to short to be arguing about
> weather to rumble or not to rumble...
Too true, Jesus this thread's gonna catch up the WLT if it keeps going like this.
How'd the tests go my geeky friend?
;)
>
> I thought it was a 350..
485 to be precise.
> This is true though, although the same applies to the Emotion Engine.
> In fact, moreso, due to the EE being an extremely unique chips. And
> the PS2 actually has more processors than a GameCube..
Does it apply to the Xbox processor as well?
I like the Gamecube pad. It's comfortable, functional and not too different from the DualShock.
But I prefer the DualShock, for reasons specific to me, which I've tried to outline throughout this thread.
Whatever anyone else thinks is therefore irrelevant, and I'm leaving this thread alone as of now.
Each to their own - enjoy your console.