The "General Games Chat" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
O.K. I know the PS2 is a bit more out of date than the Nintendo and Microsoft entries, but it is still holding fast as the U.K's number one console, so I need to know why you think PS2 has stayed top for so long.
Page:
But GameCube am winnar.
any good games coming soon?
for PS2 or PC?
for PS2 or PC?
lalakersrule wrote:
> What are you on about? Struggling to hold 8 players in a game? Socom
> manages 16 just fine without any really bad lag until you get morons
> from Spain and the such coming on slowing everything down. It comes
> down to how the developer implements the online aspects of the game.
Socom and.....Socom 2?
WOW!
Then you gotta be in ore of the other 'great' games in the onlineline-up.
2 player SSX 3
4 player XIII
8 Player Rainbow Six 3 with no co-op mode
8 player Ghost Recon with 2 player co-op
2 player Lord of the Rings
etc etc
Not exactly very enticing in the slightest. Let's hope Sony do a better job with PS3.
FM, you're not trying to tell me that you can find 70 games on PS2 that are really worth your time are you?
> What are you on about? Struggling to hold 8 players in a game? Socom
> manages 16 just fine without any really bad lag until you get morons
> from Spain and the such coming on slowing everything down. It comes
> down to how the developer implements the online aspects of the game.
Socom and.....Socom 2?
WOW!
Then you gotta be in ore of the other 'great' games in the onlineline-up.
2 player SSX 3
4 player XIII
8 Player Rainbow Six 3 with no co-op mode
8 player Ghost Recon with 2 player co-op
2 player Lord of the Rings
etc etc
Not exactly very enticing in the slightest. Let's hope Sony do a better job with PS3.
FM, you're not trying to tell me that you can find 70 games on PS2 that are really worth your time are you?
lalakersrule wrote:
> and games that aren't already out on PC where they play alot better.
That's just giving into the masses of nerdy PC owners who whine on about ggraphics cards and geekware till the cows come home. Are you trying to tell me you've actually played half of the PC ports on Xbox, long enough to work out which system they play better on?
Didn't think so.
If you still want that list though, I'd be happy to give you it.....though it could get very boring for both of us.
> and games that aren't already out on PC where they play alot better.
That's just giving into the masses of nerdy PC owners who whine on about ggraphics cards and geekware till the cows come home. Are you trying to tell me you've actually played half of the PC ports on Xbox, long enough to work out which system they play better on?
Didn't think so.
If you still want that list though, I'd be happy to give you it.....though it could get very boring for both of us.
FantasyMeister wrote:
> PS2 160
> XBox 48
> Gamecube 27
>
> TA DAAAA!
You failed to mentioned that the PS2 has been out about a year longer than both XBox and GameCube.
> PS2 160
> XBox 48
> Gamecube 27
>
> TA DAAAA!
You failed to mentioned that the PS2 has been out about a year longer than both XBox and GameCube.
And theres nothing that comes in comparison to a mini game of MP5 with your mates.
Apart from PES3.
Apart from PES3.
Tiltawhirl wrote:
> lalakersrule wrote:
>
> and games that aren't already out on PC where they play alot better.
>
> That's just giving into the masses of nerdy PC owners who whine on
> about ggraphics cards and geekware till the cows come home. Are you
> trying to tell me you've actually played half of the PC ports on
> Xbox, long enough to work out which system they play better on?
>
> Didn't think so.
I've played a fair few of them and whether it be the fact the xbox pad is the worst thing in history or i just like playing FPS games on a PC i prefer the PC versions.
Mouse and keyboard my friend, the biggest reason the PC is my preferred system.
> lalakersrule wrote:
>
> and games that aren't already out on PC where they play alot better.
>
> That's just giving into the masses of nerdy PC owners who whine on
> about ggraphics cards and geekware till the cows come home. Are you
> trying to tell me you've actually played half of the PC ports on
> Xbox, long enough to work out which system they play better on?
>
> Didn't think so.
I've played a fair few of them and whether it be the fact the xbox pad is the worst thing in history or i just like playing FPS games on a PC i prefer the PC versions.
Mouse and keyboard my friend, the biggest reason the PC is my preferred system.
Tiltawhirl wrote:
> lalakersrule wrote:
>
> What are you on about? Struggling to hold 8 players in a game? Socom
> manages 16 just fine without any really bad lag until you get morons
> from Spain and the such coming on slowing everything down. It comes
> down to how the developer implements the online aspects of the game.
>
> Socom and.....Socom 2?
>
> WOW!
>
> Then you gotta be in ore of the other 'great' games in the
> onlineline-up.
>
> 2 player SSX 3
> 4 player XIII
> 8 Player Rainbow Six 3 with no co-op mode
> 8 player Ghost Recon with 2 player co-op
> 2 player Lord of the Rings
>
> etc etc
>
> Not exactly very enticing in the slightest. Let's hope Sony do a
> better job with PS3.
That has got nothing to do with Sony or the Network Adapter though, it's down to the developers who make those games.
> lalakersrule wrote:
>
> What are you on about? Struggling to hold 8 players in a game? Socom
> manages 16 just fine without any really bad lag until you get morons
> from Spain and the such coming on slowing everything down. It comes
> down to how the developer implements the online aspects of the game.
>
> Socom and.....Socom 2?
>
> WOW!
>
> Then you gotta be in ore of the other 'great' games in the
> onlineline-up.
>
> 2 player SSX 3
> 4 player XIII
> 8 Player Rainbow Six 3 with no co-op mode
> 8 player Ghost Recon with 2 player co-op
> 2 player Lord of the Rings
>
> etc etc
>
> Not exactly very enticing in the slightest. Let's hope Sony do a
> better job with PS3.
That has got nothing to do with Sony or the Network Adapter though, it's down to the developers who make those games.
Rickoss wrote:
> FantasyMeister wrote:
> PS2 160
> XBox 48
> Gamecube 27
>
> TA DAAAA!
>
> You failed to mentioned that the PS2 has been out about a year longer
> than both XBox and GameCube.
Ah, but does that really matter?
Is Joe Public going to say "well, the PS2 has got more titles, but because it's been out longer than the GC and Xbox, I won't buy one because it ain't fair"? Nope.
> FantasyMeister wrote:
> PS2 160
> XBox 48
> Gamecube 27
>
> TA DAAAA!
>
> You failed to mentioned that the PS2 has been out about a year longer
> than both XBox and GameCube.
Ah, but does that really matter?
Is Joe Public going to say "well, the PS2 has got more titles, but because it's been out longer than the GC and Xbox, I won't buy one because it ain't fair"? Nope.
Tiltawhirl wrote:
> That's jus**t giving into the masses of nerdy PC owners who whine on
> about ggraphics cards and geekware till the cows come home.
I'm not a geek, neither are a lot of PC owners who enjoy PC games. Its people who think console gaming is much more s**treet than PC gaming which is the sad part. Its not any less geeky, unless you class getting weak ports as being non geeky.
Don't be quick to judge PC gamers, you play LIVE a sh*t load, a lot more than I play PC gaming. Does that make you a geek?
> That's jus**t giving into the masses of nerdy PC owners who whine on
> about ggraphics cards and geekware till the cows come home.
I'm not a geek, neither are a lot of PC owners who enjoy PC games. Its people who think console gaming is much more s**treet than PC gaming which is the sad part. Its not any less geeky, unless you class getting weak ports as being non geeky.
Don't be quick to judge PC gamers, you play LIVE a sh*t load, a lot more than I play PC gaming. Does that make you a geek?
Page: