Viewing Thread:
"GTCrappy"

I am sorry but I have had it up to here (er-yes points to the sky) with people praising this game!

I like it yes, well done Sony. Its a good game, but it has major flaws and should be called GT2.2! If Sony were to release this game on the Playstation people would be in uproar, only the graphics save it from being any different to its predescessor and the fact it has 450 less cars to choose from.

Come to think of it, it more of a show off from Sony to display the Playstation 2's graphic and visual abilities.


'Oh look at the amazing sunglare effect' the man in the shop said to a customer.

'Oh well lets not play the game and look at the sun, shall we? Doffus!' I muttered.


Its not that special come to think of it. It is a great racer, but it has the same nice cars GT2 had (but less), its still got the same great control, and a great game length, infact it even has some of the same courses.

One whole year ago a game called Metropolis Street Racer was released onto a console which is no longer being made, it had practically the same or better visuals, a better progression system and overall was a better game. Yet it was completely overlooked by most and was left to only selling moderately well!

Don't get me wrong, I love the way Sony have gotten away with it, and yes its a great game, but its not worth buying a console for (a £300 console), it still has the same dodgy damage system and the oppenents still feel so computerised (so much for the chip), oh, and when the wheel does work its nice and easy..

Sony are claiming that GT3 is the fastest ever selling game, I claim it to be the fastest selling ever upgrade!

Seriously, visuals have taken over! Gone is good gameplay. Thank God for the GB Advance!

'I spit in Sony's eye and it fizz!'
er-yes

Well the bottom line is Sony is crap..

(muh hahahah)

Meka! I want Secret Of Mana!

[email protected]

mail me!

The problem with GT3 is that is it too much like other racers. Maybe if you included Nintendo characters, had cartoony surroundings and less ppolygons it'd be okay.

Imagine a non-cartoony Mario game? *Shudders...*

Ninty = Colour Mad!

If you want to wind someone up, post it while Turbonutter is around.

He snaps really easily :-D

Wòókiee Møn§†€R wrote:
> Meka_Dragon wrote:
> So why did it take so long then?
>
> Difficulties with programming?

AARRRRRRGGGHH!!!

Damn it you freaks, respond!

I'm trying hard to wind you up here, and what happens? Only Wookiee responds, and he knows I'm not serious!

I think the problem with most PS2 owners (no offence to people here) is that most of them don't knwo what good games are. They are NOT games with great graphics. They are games that are original, inovative, and introduce new ideas.

PS2 owners say "GT3 is great". It is. BUT, it is nothing new. Many PS2 owners have never played MSR... but still say "oh, but the DC is dead". If they knew anything about games they would admit that AT PRESENT the DC has a far better library of games. Oh, and the rubbish about "PS2 can play PSX games, so has a huge library..." is balls! I could buy a DC with a good range of games and a PS1 for less than a PS2! And if u have PS1 games u must have a PS1 anyway!

NiGHTS!

Understandibly PS2 owners are proud of it but isn't it a bit too uninspired to be getting all this attention...

Red Faction deserves the attention.
I've not played it but from what I've heard it's original, clever and great fun.

Why should it be over shadowed by racing update, a nice looking update but an update none the less.

following on form my post... GT3 is not a sequal, it just adds to GT2... but it is a great game still! Definately worth a look... if u have a ps2... which i don't

NiGHTS!

Mr.Snuggly wrote:
> Nope, you're wrong. GT3 is great.

I hear 'great' but then again.. turrico on the GB was great!

It's the almighty Alistar Gray, come on down!

Mr.Snuggly wrote:
> Nope, you're wrong. GT3 is great.


You're Tony Donovan, aren't you!