The "General Games Chat" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
Better bloody improve soon, i actually want to play this game eventually
I have to wait till March.
Mines should arrive tomorrow :^D
T'is a bit of a marathon, must get into it a bit more. Seems a bit odd how it was stressed that in the first mission "you must not engage the enemy in battle" yet I've killed quite a few with no consequences, yet.
Got killed by a crocodile and eaten by a swamp, which was fun.
> But GT4 will have damage in it...
Err .... no.
Seemed to go far too quickly with very little that stood out as being amazing.
Was a decent game but I have no plans of playing through it again soon, graphics were decent but the aiming system still sucks (Can't believe you can't move forwards while using the first person view).
Although I found the big gay russian guy mildly amussing when I put on my disguise.
The heavy emphasis on the MGS storyline was brilliant in both the first and second and it would be a shame if the third was different. This is what it does, and it's what it does best.
Besides, people exagerrate. There is a lot of play time and it's very enjoyable.
However I will have worked off my rather large debt and be able to buy things again! Hazaa!
> lalakersrule wrote:
> however i was hoping this one would be different
>
> Why? Because you didn't want it to be Metal Gear? This is similar to
> all the people who are no doubt going to go out and buy GT4 and say
> "wtf, it has no damage in it".
>
> No excuses at this stage, if you want a game to be something
> different to what it is, play something different.
But GT4 will have damage in it...