The "Freeola Customer Forum" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
I'm just interested in the answers.
(Oh, but you can only do this when it's 'war', because otherwise not enough other people have agreed with you that it's okay to kill someone)
yaaaaaaaaaaar!
On a grander scale, there is little difference between judging someone to lock them away and judging someone to kill them. Both have the belief that what someone has done is wrong, that they should be removed from the planet (or at least for prison, locked away from most of the planet).
So is any judgement fair, at all? By judgement of prison, a group of people decide if this person falls into standard humanity. By what I'm asking, I ask if I'm right to take it upon myself to judge a single human being and why if I so believe I cannot kill them.
And by that, why is it not fair to trust my own judgement? If they, and not directly, affect my life, do I not have the responsibility to stop them if I truly believe it's the best thing to do?
It should be "Why shouldn't I kill someone?" rather than "Why can't I?"
Just should be.
The only reason I can come up with is that you don't have the right to decide when someones life is terminated, no-one does - except teh person themselves, hence why death in all forms (except suicide) is unfair.
If you kill a person who is evil, then a perfectly good innocent person will have to die to balance it out.
So if you kill your exact opposite, you may die.
Think about that now.