Viewing Thread:
"The Bible is fiction."

The bible was written a long time ago and was used as a way of controlling people. Ordinary people were scared of this thing known as God because they did not understand death. We still do not understand death but at least we understand life a little better.
God was used to explain the unexplainable but now we understand some of the unexplainable. We no longer need God like our ancesters. All we need is hope...
Human nature is destruction and the only thing that we should hope for is that we do not destroy the beautiful planet on which we live. We do not deserve the gifts we have but maybe one day we will be truely gateful for them...

Allred wrote:
> No, I'm saying your comparision was awful, you inept monkey...

Don't you understand the complexity behind reproduction and the ability animals have to reproduce themselves? That, demands a Creator.

Forest Fan wrote:
> Allred wrote:
> Yep.
>
> Explain?
>
> Every masterpiece needs a creator, it needs planning.
>
> Do you think the most wonderful paintings in the world, were a result
> of explosion or an artists imagination?

Artist's imagination, of course.

But the world's not really a painting, is it? Not really .

Nor is the Universe, of course.

Or is it? Explain if you think it is.

But I deny this idea that plants, the environment etc are definitely the most beautiful things that could have been created. We've been brought up (some might even say we've evolved) to live in an environment where we see these things as beautiful, but only because they're the most beautiful things that we know, or more beautiful than other things.

That isn't to say that these are the most beautiful things that possibly could have been created, though, does it? They're only beautfil within our viewpoints, within our understanding - much as you might like to think, the things we understand now aren't the only things available to understand, see.

So, it's perfectly possible that chaos could have created these things. Just as chaos could have created all the bad, dangerous things in the world, it could also have thrown up the beauty of the world as well. If the world was purely beauty and wonder, then perhaps chaos wouldn't be so probable. But the world isn't that. Anything but, in fact. The world has good points and bad points.

What's to say that chaos couldn't have made some good and some bad?

Forest Fan wrote:
> Allred wrote:
> Thats incompatible. Since when does paper/canvas/paintings breed?
> Since when does paper/canvas/paintings have volcanic erruptions?
> Since when are paper/canvas/paintings made up of living beings that
> move and have independant though? It's a stupid comparision, which
> does not take into account any of the variables of life, matter,
> electricity, magnatism, the motion of objects, etc.
>
> So you want to further proove my point? Then, thankyou.

I know you're only 14, but seriously, what's the point in trying to have an intelligent discussion when you so clearly don't understand anything people write?

Re-read his post idiot.

Forest Fan wrote:
> Allred wrote:
> Thats incompatible. Since when does paper/canvas/paintings breed?
> Since when does paper/canvas/paintings have volcanic erruptions?
> Since when are paper/canvas/paintings made up of living beings that
> move and have independant though? It's a stupid comparision, which
> does not take into account any of the variables of life, matter,
> electricity, magnatism, the motion of objects, etc.
>
> So you want to further proove my point? Then, thankyou.

No, I'm saying your comparision was awful, you inept monkey...

Allred wrote:
> Thats incompatible. Since when does paper/canvas/paintings breed?
> Since when does paper/canvas/paintings have volcanic erruptions?
> Since when are paper/canvas/paintings made up of living beings that
> move and have independant though? It's a stupid comparision, which
> does not take into account any of the variables of life, matter,
> electricity, magnatism, the motion of objects, etc.

So you want to further proove my point? Then, thankyou.

Forest Fan wrote:
> Quinty wrote:
> Hooray the religion topics will die now, seems as Archangel is the
> only one who posts in them.
>
> Woot.
>
> I'll still be here and just as eager as ever to answer your
> questions.

As per usual you completly miss the point.

Ho Hum.

Forest Fan wrote:
> Allred wrote:
> Yep.
>
> Explain?
>
> Every masterpiece needs a creator, it needs planning.
>
> Do you think the most wonderful paintings in the world, were a result
> of explosion or an artists imagination?

Thats incompatible. Since when does paper/canvas/paintings breed? Since when does paper/canvas/paintings have volcanic erruptions? Since when are paper/canvas/paintings made up of living beings that move and have independant though? It's a stupid comparision, which does not take into account any of the variables of life, matter, electricity, magnatism, the motion of objects, etc.

Quinty wrote:
> Hooray the religion topics will die now, seems as Archangel is the
> only one who posts in them.
>
> Woot.

I'll still be here and just as eager as ever to answer your questions.

Allred wrote:
> Yep.

Explain?

Every masterpiece needs a creator, it needs planning.

Do you think the most wonderful paintings in the world, were a result of explosion or an artists imagination?

Archangel wrote:
> Just to let you know, FF, I may be out of touch for awhile. Going to
> university for a degree in something. I'll keep tabs when I can and
> post when able. May God bless you and yours.

Hooray the religion topics will die now, seems as Archangel is the only one who posts in them.

Woot.