Viewing Thread:
"Gay marriage and parenthood (I don't think so)"

They all have to bombard us with their feelings of unfair treatment on this subject,but if we all approved then isn't it just like saying let there be no more genuine reproductions in the world?

Strafio wrote:
> Well, what's wrong with it?

It is sick and as I have said many times before totally un-natural.
>
> Sure, it's not exactly natural, but driving a car isn't natural,
> cooking food isn't natural, using soap isn't natural, watching TV
> isn't natural...

As in natural, I mean acceptable. It is acceptable to cook food, but how is it natural for two men to be together?
>
>
> Sure, I wouldn't want to do it, but I wouldn't want to eat mash
> potato either but I wouldn't condemn others for doing so.
> I have nothing against other people beliefs and if they choose to
> believe in a book to it's every word that's fine... until they start
> trying to tell the rest of us what we should and shouldn't do because
> of it.... sort of...

Can't you still see, how wrong it is? Don't you think relationships should be between a man and a woman, or what?

Well, what's wrong with it?

Sure, it's not exactly natural, but driving a car isn't natural, cooking food isn't natural, using soap isn't natural, watching TV isn't natural...


Sure, I wouldn't want to do it, but I wouldn't want to eat mash potato either but I wouldn't condemn others for doing so.
I have nothing against other people beliefs and if they choose to believe in a book to it's every word that's fine... until they start trying to tell the rest of us what we should and shouldn't do because of it.... sort of...

Is there one person in here, apart from me who think Homo-sexuality is even WRONG?

Ashman wrote:
> Forest Fan wrote:
> The Word of God forsaw this surge in Homo-sexuality, that occurs
> today; the End Times. Today, 11% of the population of the world is
> Homo-sexual.
>
> So? That means nothing, why is homosexuality wrong?

Because it is un-natural. A man and a woman were meant for each other, there is no way around what is natural.

I believe that homosexual people should be able to adopt. If you think about it, they are far more able than a oerson that will abuse their child or fail to look after it.

Forest Fan wrote:
> The Word of God forsaw this surge in Homo-sexuality, that occurs
> today; the End Times. Today, 11% of the population of the world is
> Homo-sexual.

So? That means nothing, why is homosexuality wrong?

I got ready for my night out too early so I thought i'd have a look at what's happening and so far there are 3 ways gay people can have babies:

1)Use a seregate mother to carry the baby however then it is only genetically the baby of one of the Dads and the other Dad has no legal rights in it's upbringing and doesn't have the right to see it if the couple break up despite being a father figure for however many years.

2)Adoption, this means that both parents have the same legal rights of a straight couple when adopting but none of them are genetically linked to the child.

3)There is a costly medical procedure in which a women surrenders all her eggs over a period of time to science for a cost, thus surrendering the right to the potential children. Then scientists fertilise some eggs with the sperm of one Dad and some eggs with the sperm of the other. Then they use genetic manipulation so the fertile eggs of one Dad all produce boys and the fertilised eggs of the other Dad only produce girls. The ones not used are kept frozen but it allows gay parents to have their choice of boys and girls, sisters and brothers. I still don't think they have full legal rights though just a few.

And when supplies run out?

As for cloning - that would increase the risks of terrorist attacks and genetic modification.

+ frozen spunk.
Men are worthless.

Erm, cloning.

EDIT: you know, test tube babies and stuff.