The "Freeola Customer Forum" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
Right let me explain something to you about people.
People don't like to be told what to do. You may be right, you may be wrong, but endlessly forcing your beliefs on people is going to force away more people than it 'saves'.
Don't think of us as the 'children of God' think of us as the 'Adolescents of God' now apply all the cliches that go with adolescence: The more you tell us to do something the more likely we are to go against what you say, we aren't going to listen to you when we can think for ourselves, we are making the most of our freedom and anyone who is seeking to limit that freedom is biting off more than they can chew.
What we want is actions NOT words if you can show people what good you or your faction of christianity actually PHYSICALLY DOES to make the world a better place, you've a much better chance of having people listen to you. If you go around quoting events that 'happened' hundreds of years ago most people will ignore you. You have to be relevant to people for them to listen to you, so what I want you to let us know is what does your particular branch of christianty PHYSICALLY DO to make the world a better place? Do you have schemes that help the poor? Do you try to help areas suffering from disease and famine? If your branch merely focuses it's energy on converting people through word of mouth alone and not through deeds then I'm afraid your branch is destined to wither and die.
People don't like to be told what to do. You may be right, you may be wrong, but endlessly forcing your beliefs on people is going to force away more people than it 'saves'.
Don't think of us as the 'children of God' think of us as the 'Adolescents of God' now apply all the cliches that go with adolescence: The more you tell us to do something the more likely we are to go against what you say, we aren't going to listen to you when we can think for ourselves, we are making the most of our freedom and anyone who is seeking to limit that freedom is biting off more than they can chew.
What we want is actions NOT words if you can show people what good you or your faction of christianity actually PHYSICALLY DOES to make the world a better place, you've a much better chance of having people listen to you. If you go around quoting events that 'happened' hundreds of years ago most people will ignore you. You have to be relevant to people for them to listen to you, so what I want you to let us know is what does your particular branch of christianty PHYSICALLY DO to make the world a better place? Do you have schemes that help the poor? Do you try to help areas suffering from disease and famine? If your branch merely focuses it's energy on converting people through word of mouth alone and not through deeds then I'm afraid your branch is destined to wither and die.
Page:
Forest Fan wrote:
> It takes both a MAN and a WOMAN to produce children; thus disproving
> Evolution at the same time.
I think I just weed myself.
Yes, sex disproves evolution.
Well done, gold star there m'boy.
But, men soon will become redundant.
What does a man give? Spunk. He doesn't have to be alive to give it, it doesn't have to be within him for it to work properly.
What does a women give? The womb. If the woman dies, no baby.
And, once cloning is done and dusted, men and all their juices will no longer be needed. The world will be a planet of heaving lesbains.
Lovely.
> It takes both a MAN and a WOMAN to produce children; thus disproving
> Evolution at the same time.
I think I just weed myself.
Yes, sex disproves evolution.
Well done, gold star there m'boy.
But, men soon will become redundant.
What does a man give? Spunk. He doesn't have to be alive to give it, it doesn't have to be within him for it to work properly.
What does a women give? The womb. If the woman dies, no baby.
And, once cloning is done and dusted, men and all their juices will no longer be needed. The world will be a planet of heaving lesbains.
Lovely.
FinalFantasyFanatic wrote:
> Forest Fan wrote:
> FinalFantasyFanatic wrote:
> Forest Fan wrote:
> Because in the same way men should be head of the household, men
> should be head of the church.
>
> Why?
>
> Because men are the stronger of the two sexes, women the fairer. Men
> have more repsonsibilities placed upon them, similarly women have
> the
> purpose of child bearing.
>
> And with one sweeping generalisation, you're gimpness expands.
>
> Men have more responsibilities placed upon them? Tosh.
>
> I'll give you the child-bearing one - although it should give
> women more reason to lead. Soon enough men will become redundant, not
> even needed to progress the human race.
It takes both a MAN and a WOMAN to produce children; thus disproving Evolution at the same time.
>
> I could name plently of women that could kick your ass. And surely
> power should be given to those who are fair and just, rather than
> those who wield brute force.
As for women in the Church, they have different roles. We, as sinful men are in no position to question God and as women are the weaker sex, their position should not be where they have power over men. Most women in churches with male pastors, fully support the need for a male pastor, as the Word of God instructs.
> Forest Fan wrote:
> FinalFantasyFanatic wrote:
> Forest Fan wrote:
> Because in the same way men should be head of the household, men
> should be head of the church.
>
> Why?
>
> Because men are the stronger of the two sexes, women the fairer. Men
> have more repsonsibilities placed upon them, similarly women have
> the
> purpose of child bearing.
>
> And with one sweeping generalisation, you're gimpness expands.
>
> Men have more responsibilities placed upon them? Tosh.
>
> I'll give you the child-bearing one - although it should give
> women more reason to lead. Soon enough men will become redundant, not
> even needed to progress the human race.
It takes both a MAN and a WOMAN to produce children; thus disproving Evolution at the same time.
>
> I could name plently of women that could kick your ass. And surely
> power should be given to those who are fair and just, rather than
> those who wield brute force.
As for women in the Church, they have different roles. We, as sinful men are in no position to question God and as women are the weaker sex, their position should not be where they have power over men. Most women in churches with male pastors, fully support the need for a male pastor, as the Word of God instructs.
SHEEPY wrote:
> Forest Fan wrote:
> SHEEPY wrote:
> Why does God say women can't be ministers?
>
> Because women would become ministers for the wrong reasons, like
> wanting to get power over men.
>
> HAHAHAHHA
Something funny?
> Forest Fan wrote:
> SHEEPY wrote:
> Why does God say women can't be ministers?
>
> Because women would become ministers for the wrong reasons, like
> wanting to get power over men.
>
> HAHAHAHHA
Something funny?
FinalFantasyFanatic wrote:
> Forest Fan wrote:
> FinalFantasyFanatic wrote:
>
> Are we talking about you or just "a gay"?
>
> You.
>
> Um... no FFF, that doesn't apply to me, however to all the
> Homo-sexuals out there this verse might help;
>
> Oh, come on, loosen up. You're as bent as they get.
Nope, perfectly straight.
>
> And 'this verse might help'?
> Possibly the most pompous thing you've ever said. Hilariously so.
Pompous? Well I can assure you it wasn't meant to be pompous, informative I like to think.
> Forest Fan wrote:
> FinalFantasyFanatic wrote:
>
> Are we talking about you or just "a gay"?
>
> You.
>
> Um... no FFF, that doesn't apply to me, however to all the
> Homo-sexuals out there this verse might help;
>
> Oh, come on, loosen up. You're as bent as they get.
Nope, perfectly straight.
>
> And 'this verse might help'?
> Possibly the most pompous thing you've ever said. Hilariously so.
Pompous? Well I can assure you it wasn't meant to be pompous, informative I like to think.
Forest Fan wrote:
> FinalFantasyFanatic wrote:
> Forest Fan wrote:
> Because in the same way men should be head of the household, men
> should be head of the church.
>
> Why?
>
> Because men are the stronger of the two sexes, women the fairer. Men
> have more repsonsibilities placed upon them, similarly women have the
> purpose of child bearing.
And with one sweeping generalisation, you're gimpness expands.
Men have more responsibilities placed upon them? Tosh.
I'll give you the child-bearing one - although it should give women more reason to lead. Soon enough men will become redundant, not even needed to progress the human race.
I could name plently of women that could kick your ass. And surely power should be given to those who are fair and just, rather than those who wield brute force.
> FinalFantasyFanatic wrote:
> Forest Fan wrote:
> Because in the same way men should be head of the household, men
> should be head of the church.
>
> Why?
>
> Because men are the stronger of the two sexes, women the fairer. Men
> have more repsonsibilities placed upon them, similarly women have the
> purpose of child bearing.
And with one sweeping generalisation, you're gimpness expands.
Men have more responsibilities placed upon them? Tosh.
I'll give you the child-bearing one - although it should give women more reason to lead. Soon enough men will become redundant, not even needed to progress the human race.
I could name plently of women that could kick your ass. And surely power should be given to those who are fair and just, rather than those who wield brute force.
Forest Fan wrote:
> SHEEPY wrote:
> Why does God say women can't be ministers?
>
> Because women would become ministers for the wrong reasons, like
> wanting to get power over men.
HAHAHAHHA
> SHEEPY wrote:
> Why does God say women can't be ministers?
>
> Because women would become ministers for the wrong reasons, like
> wanting to get power over men.
HAHAHAHHA
Forest Fan wrote:
> FinalFantasyFanatic wrote:
>
> Are we talking about you or just "a gay"?
>
> You.
>
> Um... no FFF, that doesn't apply to me, however to all the
> Homo-sexuals out there this verse might help;
Oh, come on, loosen up. You're as bent as they get.
And 'this verse might help'?
Possibly the most pompous thing you've ever said. Hilariously so.
> FinalFantasyFanatic wrote:
>
> Are we talking about you or just "a gay"?
>
> You.
>
> Um... no FFF, that doesn't apply to me, however to all the
> Homo-sexuals out there this verse might help;
Oh, come on, loosen up. You're as bent as they get.
And 'this verse might help'?
Possibly the most pompous thing you've ever said. Hilariously so.
FinalFantasyFanatic wrote:
> Forest Fan wrote:
> Because in the same way men should be head of the household, men
> should be head of the church.
>
> Why?
Because men are the stronger of the two sexes, women the fairer. Men have more repsonsibilities placed upon them, similarly women have the purpose of child bearing.
> Forest Fan wrote:
> Because in the same way men should be head of the household, men
> should be head of the church.
>
> Why?
Because men are the stronger of the two sexes, women the fairer. Men have more repsonsibilities placed upon them, similarly women have the purpose of child bearing.
FinalFantasyFanatic wrote:
> Forest Fan wrote:
> FinalFantasyFanatic wrote:
> Well, they obviously don't now, do they?
> So what's the problem. Things change, get over it. Why should
> someone
> not be allowed to share the wonderout word of the Lord simply
> because
> of their gender?
>
> Because the Word of God never changes. Anyway men are the head of
> the
> household and the church, it is exactly the same logic, got it?
>
> The same lame, moronic logic as 3000 years ago, yes.
> And the Word of God has changed, many times.
The Word of God has NEVER changed FFF. Been translated, yes many times. Been changed, some might of but the Holy Bible hasn't.
> Forest Fan wrote:
> FinalFantasyFanatic wrote:
> Well, they obviously don't now, do they?
> So what's the problem. Things change, get over it. Why should
> someone
> not be allowed to share the wonderout word of the Lord simply
> because
> of their gender?
>
> Because the Word of God never changes. Anyway men are the head of
> the
> household and the church, it is exactly the same logic, got it?
>
> The same lame, moronic logic as 3000 years ago, yes.
> And the Word of God has changed, many times.
The Word of God has NEVER changed FFF. Been translated, yes many times. Been changed, some might of but the Holy Bible hasn't.
Forest Fan wrote:
> Because in the same way men should be head of the household, men
> should be head of the church.
Why?
> Because in the same way men should be head of the household, men
> should be head of the church.
Why?
Page: