The "Freeola Customer Forum" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
36 Dead in Iraq after a car bomb is detonated, taking the total to 80 in several days, the others killed by a suicide bomber.
How do you fight those that are basically invisible to conventional detection methods, those who are willing to end their own life in an effort to kill many others? Both in Iraq, and in general in the war on terrorism? Conventional rules of war no longer apply. Seemingly no-one in the entire world is safe from these coward, inhuman Islamic Extremists.
Are there any simple solutions? Are we doomed to live in perpetual paranoia? Are we going the right way about it?
How do you fight those that are basically invisible to conventional detection methods, those who are willing to end their own life in an effort to kill many others? Both in Iraq, and in general in the war on terrorism? Conventional rules of war no longer apply. Seemingly no-one in the entire world is safe from these coward, inhuman Islamic Extremists.
Are there any simple solutions? Are we doomed to live in perpetual paranoia? Are we going the right way about it?
Page:
Besides Darworck, how is it fighting for freedom when the attacks target the native population and not the coalition forces?
I think we *may* be coming towards the final throes of revolt in Iraq. Targetting Iraqi's themselves stinks of desperation and it will only turn more normal people against those comitting such acts. They're obviously concentrating on soft targets now because they lack the resources, manpower or simply guts to go directly attack the coalition.
Please note this is only my theory of course...I know certain people here seem to be under a different impression sometimes...
I think we *may* be coming towards the final throes of revolt in Iraq. Targetting Iraqi's themselves stinks of desperation and it will only turn more normal people against those comitting such acts. They're obviously concentrating on soft targets now because they lack the resources, manpower or simply guts to go directly attack the coalition.
Please note this is only my theory of course...I know certain people here seem to be under a different impression sometimes...
No. Read it. You cannot argue that fighting for what is perceived as freedom is the same as fighting to regain status...the two are totally different ideas.
so....we all exist in Darwock 's mind?
In your mind maybe...
That's exactly the same thing as freedom...
Those idiots aren't fighting for freedom, they want their power back, plain and simple.
Yeah, probably. Whatever.
monkey_man wrote:
> There was a bit in Cuba, or somewhere like that, where Al Pacino, or
> that other guy (can't remember his name, the main one), sees a
> teenager grab a police chief, forces him into the back of a car and
> then explodes a hand grenade, killing them both. I swear it's
> Goodfellas. Actually, it was probably The Godfather...oops.
Might be "Scarface", if theres a part in Cuba
> There was a bit in Cuba, or somewhere like that, where Al Pacino, or
> that other guy (can't remember his name, the main one), sees a
> teenager grab a police chief, forces him into the back of a car and
> then explodes a hand grenade, killing them both. I swear it's
> Goodfellas. Actually, it was probably The Godfather...oops.
Might be "Scarface", if theres a part in Cuba
monkey_man wrote:
> There was a bit in Cuba,
Not Scarface?
> There was a bit in Cuba,
Not Scarface?
There was a bit in Cuba, or somewhere like that, where Al Pacino, or that other guy (can't remember his name, the main one), sees a teenager grab a police chief, forces him into the back of a car and then explodes a hand grenade, killing them both. I swear it's Goodfellas. Actually, it was probably The Godfather...oops.
Page: