The "Freeola Customer Forum" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
....Pity it's in the wrong net! ;-)
Boro win 2-1 against the Arsenal
Sorry Boro but I think it's Bolton's year.
Boro win 2-1 against the Arsenal
Sorry Boro but I think it's Bolton's year.
Page:
Clazon wrote:
> yes yes. except for an inform becks, inform scholes and inform
> gerrard.
Yes inform scholes who hasn't scored for England in 2 years. He may be playing well for united, but he has produced for england, so give frank a chance. Beckham + Scholes + Gerrard = 3 midfielders. Assuming he goes 4-4-2, there's still one space for a midfielder, if my maths serves me correctly.
> vieira hasn't lost it
He hasn't lost "it" (well completely) but he's not the player that he was. Hmm the last time those to met in a BIG game was the fa cup final, and frank played him off the park. Yet we still managed to lose.... Stupid Chelsea.
> yes yes. except for an inform becks, inform scholes and inform
> gerrard.
Yes inform scholes who hasn't scored for England in 2 years. He may be playing well for united, but he has produced for england, so give frank a chance. Beckham + Scholes + Gerrard = 3 midfielders. Assuming he goes 4-4-2, there's still one space for a midfielder, if my maths serves me correctly.
> vieira hasn't lost it
He hasn't lost "it" (well completely) but he's not the player that he was. Hmm the last time those to met in a BIG game was the fa cup final, and frank played him off the park. Yet we still managed to lose.... Stupid Chelsea.
Clazon wrote:
> Colourless wrote:
>
> But I thought it was a tad harsh to say he works harder than
> lamaprd.
>
> the truth is harsh sometimes :D
It does sometimes, but this one isn't true.
> Colourless wrote:
>
> But I thought it was a tad harsh to say he works harder than
> lamaprd.
>
> the truth is harsh sometimes :D
It does sometimes, but this one isn't true.
Clazon wrote:
>and vieira has to be the top central mid in the premiership.
------------------
Oooooooooooooh, I disagree with that fella ;)
>and vieira has to be the top central mid in the premiership.
------------------
Oooooooooooooh, I disagree with that fella ;)
Colourless wrote:
> But I thought it was a tad harsh to say he works harder than
> lamaprd.
the truth is harsh sometimes :D
> Frankie for ENgland.
yes yes. except for an inform becks, inform scholes and inform gerrard.
vieira hasn't lost it and we'll prove that in a week or 2's time. lamps and paddy go head to head.
> But I thought it was a tad harsh to say he works harder than
> lamaprd.
the truth is harsh sometimes :D
> Frankie for ENgland.
yes yes. except for an inform becks, inform scholes and inform gerrard.
vieira hasn't lost it and we'll prove that in a week or 2's time. lamps and paddy go head to head.
I'm not saying that he's not good. But he's not the player he was. But in doing this, he's cleaned up his act as far as disciplinary records go.
But I thought it was a tad harsh to say he works harder than lamaprd.
Frankie for ENgland.
But I thought it was a tad harsh to say he works harder than lamaprd.
Frankie for ENgland.
Colourless wrote:
> And clazon, I'm not saying they are your first team because clearly
> they're not. But it doesn't matter who you select. Its still arsenal.
well i would agree with the literality of the comment, but im sure you know what i meant.
as for vieira, no-one can say he's past it. he hasnt covered the papers or pundits, but he's the invisible man. sometimes i wonder whether if he's even playing or not, but when i look out for him in the replays HE'S EVERYWHERE?! he tackles, stands, head up and pass. he spends no time on the ball yet he's key. look at opta index for his tackles, success rate and number of passes, etc. he really can be undervalued by some people.
> And clazon, I'm not saying they are your first team because clearly
> they're not. But it doesn't matter who you select. Its still arsenal.
well i would agree with the literality of the comment, but im sure you know what i meant.
as for vieira, no-one can say he's past it. he hasnt covered the papers or pundits, but he's the invisible man. sometimes i wonder whether if he's even playing or not, but when i look out for him in the replays HE'S EVERYWHERE?! he tackles, stands, head up and pass. he spends no time on the ball yet he's key. look at opta index for his tackles, success rate and number of passes, etc. he really can be undervalued by some people.
And clazon, I'm not saying they are your first team because clearly they're not. But it doesn't matter who you select. Its still arsenal.
Clazon wrote:
> vieira still works harder, makes more tackles, rallys the team more, etc.
Ridiculous statement.
Without lampard and terry. chelsea would be nothing.
I'm starting to think vieira's past it a bit. I used to rate him highly, and last year he was one of the best players in the world. but recently he hasn't been so instrumental for arsenal.
> vieira still works harder, makes more tackles, rallys the team more, etc.
Ridiculous statement.
Without lampard and terry. chelsea would be nothing.
I'm starting to think vieira's past it a bit. I used to rate him highly, and last year he was one of the best players in the world. but recently he hasn't been so instrumental for arsenal.
Colourless wrote:
> This excuse annoys me quite a lot. I understand what is meant by it,
> because I, as many others, have also used it at times. But I think
> that who plays in the match, is the managers choice, just as in any
> other game. So whether its Thierry Henry playing or Terry Henry, it
> is still Arsenal.
rediculous statement. they aren't full professionals yet, they've hardly played, they still think young peoples' thoughts, they just simply aren't the team you associate with arsenal. man u without rio, howard, van, mikael, giggs, scholes, keane isn't as strong as a full chelsea squad.
its just not an excuse. few expected them to win, they didnt. simple as. i can guarantee you that side will not play another game this year. (unless we win the prem with loads of games to go)
> This excuse annoys me quite a lot. I understand what is meant by it,
> because I, as many others, have also used it at times. But I think
> that who plays in the match, is the managers choice, just as in any
> other game. So whether its Thierry Henry playing or Terry Henry, it
> is still Arsenal.
rediculous statement. they aren't full professionals yet, they've hardly played, they still think young peoples' thoughts, they just simply aren't the team you associate with arsenal. man u without rio, howard, van, mikael, giggs, scholes, keane isn't as strong as a full chelsea squad.
its just not an excuse. few expected them to win, they didnt. simple as. i can guarantee you that side will not play another game this year. (unless we win the prem with loads of games to go)
Clazon is taking too much E.
eeeeeeee.
eeeeeeee.
Page: