The "Freeola Customer Forum" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
Ok, For noobs, regulars, the golden oldies and just arrived
I just wanted to say a little something.
I look around the forums of late and ALOT of new users are coming on the forums. Which is good - new generations and new people can be a great benefit for the SR community. New ideas, humour and aspects are introduced and I enjoy it.
But, We seem to have a conflict. Between old and new. The New users come on and as silly as it may seem they do not know of the SR world. How to act and post the way we do. They come in and use their txt language, make two sentence posts relating to nothing in block capitals. Obviously this will ennoy the regular users and they all join in group force abusing and generally being nasty singling these noobs out - or in some cases to retalliate and destroy it for the rest of us. Spamming the joint and getting themselves banned.
I just think - if some users when newer members start. If we just explained what we like and don't like so they are stopped in their tracks and eazed into the way we work gently things would run alot smoother for us, staff and the newer users. If we just cain immediatly and the same old thing happens, they spam wildly they'll get banned. If we maybe let them know first they wont do so. If they have been warned politely but are immature nerds which get there thrills from destroying everyone elses fun...they will be banned im sure by sir smuggly.
Come on guys. Im sure it will make it better for all of us?
Just a thought
Love ginge :)
I just wanted to say a little something.
I look around the forums of late and ALOT of new users are coming on the forums. Which is good - new generations and new people can be a great benefit for the SR community. New ideas, humour and aspects are introduced and I enjoy it.
But, We seem to have a conflict. Between old and new. The New users come on and as silly as it may seem they do not know of the SR world. How to act and post the way we do. They come in and use their txt language, make two sentence posts relating to nothing in block capitals. Obviously this will ennoy the regular users and they all join in group force abusing and generally being nasty singling these noobs out - or in some cases to retalliate and destroy it for the rest of us. Spamming the joint and getting themselves banned.
I just think - if some users when newer members start. If we just explained what we like and don't like so they are stopped in their tracks and eazed into the way we work gently things would run alot smoother for us, staff and the newer users. If we just cain immediatly and the same old thing happens, they spam wildly they'll get banned. If we maybe let them know first they wont do so. If they have been warned politely but are immature nerds which get there thrills from destroying everyone elses fun...they will be banned im sure by sir smuggly.
Come on guys. Im sure it will make it better for all of us?
Just a thought
Love ginge :)
Page:
HálloHowArtThou wrote:
> The Zeppo wrote:
> And honey, depressing doesn't mean 'to push down', if you're
> wondering.
>
> It does.
It doesn't, pet. Take my word for it.
> The Zeppo wrote:
> And honey, depressing doesn't mean 'to push down', if you're
> wondering.
>
> It does.
It doesn't, pet. Take my word for it.
The Zeppo wrote:
> And honey, depressing doesn't mean 'to push down', if you're
> wondering.
It does.
> And honey, depressing doesn't mean 'to push down', if you're
> wondering.
It does.
Mr Pink wrote:
> I find it impressive that someone with your intellectual skills knows
> how to equate.
I find it impressive that I'll be the doctor to people as idiotic as you. Actually, not impressive, the word I'm thinking of is depressing.
And honey, depressing doesn't mean 'to push down', if you're wondering.
> I find it impressive that someone with your intellectual skills knows
> how to equate.
I find it impressive that I'll be the doctor to people as idiotic as you. Actually, not impressive, the word I'm thinking of is depressing.
And honey, depressing doesn't mean 'to push down', if you're wondering.
The Zeppo wrote:
> Mr Pink wrote:
> The Zeppo wrote:
> No, I feel uncomfortable having the Honey Monster looking at my
> 'graph, pet.
>
>
> That, and the fact I don't have a life.
>
> O right, how interesting.
>
>
> I find it interesting how you equate having a digicam with having a
> life.
>
> Would it be too much of an assumption to say that you also equate
> 'not watching your star trek dvds' with 'death'?
No, thats more of a "depression" than a "death". I find it impressive that someone with your intellectual skills knows how to equate.
> Mr Pink wrote:
> The Zeppo wrote:
> No, I feel uncomfortable having the Honey Monster looking at my
> 'graph, pet.
>
>
> That, and the fact I don't have a life.
>
> O right, how interesting.
>
>
> I find it interesting how you equate having a digicam with having a
> life.
>
> Would it be too much of an assumption to say that you also equate
> 'not watching your star trek dvds' with 'death'?
No, thats more of a "depression" than a "death". I find it impressive that someone with your intellectual skills knows how to equate.
Mr Pink wrote:
> The Zeppo wrote:
> No, I feel uncomfortable having the Honey Monster looking at my
> 'graph, pet.
>
>
> That, and the fact I don't have a life.
>
> O right, how interesting.
I find it interesting how you equate having a digicam with having a life.
Would it be too much of an assumption to say that you also equate 'not watching your star trek dvds' with 'death'?
> The Zeppo wrote:
> No, I feel uncomfortable having the Honey Monster looking at my
> 'graph, pet.
>
>
> That, and the fact I don't have a life.
>
> O right, how interesting.
I find it interesting how you equate having a digicam with having a life.
Would it be too much of an assumption to say that you also equate 'not watching your star trek dvds' with 'death'?
The Zeppo wrote:
> No, I feel uncomfortable having the Honey Monster looking at my
> 'graph, pet.
>
>
> That, and the fact I don't have a life.
O right, how interesting.
> No, I feel uncomfortable having the Honey Monster looking at my
> 'graph, pet.
>
>
> That, and the fact I don't have a life.
O right, how interesting.
Lil Ginge wrote:
> *claps*
>
>
> How long did it take for you to think of that one genius?
>
> So... May I ask to see a picture of you, love?
No, I feel uncomfortable having the Honey Monster looking at my 'graph, pet.
That, and the fact I don't have a digicam.
> *claps*
>
>
> How long did it take for you to think of that one genius?
>
> So... May I ask to see a picture of you, love?
No, I feel uncomfortable having the Honey Monster looking at my 'graph, pet.
That, and the fact I don't have a digicam.
*claps*
How long did it take for you to think of that one genius?
So... May I ask to see a picture of you, love?
How long did it take for you to think of that one genius?
So... May I ask to see a picture of you, love?
Lil Ginge wrote:
> After spending my time on this and then being cained by a newbie for
> my personal appearence.
If it makes you feel any better, love, I haven't actually seen your pic. I went on your Special Observe page, but my eyes bled when they saw the image and my optic nerve thoughtfully transferred the information straight to my ass.
> After spending my time on this and then being cained by a newbie for
> my personal appearence.
If it makes you feel any better, love, I haven't actually seen your pic. I went on your Special Observe page, but my eyes bled when they saw the image and my optic nerve thoughtfully transferred the information straight to my ass.
hey thanks ginger bread man..
Are you my conscience?
Are you my conscience?
Page: