The "Freeola Customer Forum" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
For those of you who are *not* called Mr. Snuggly on the forums, ignore this. I don't want any retarded mongo's spamming this up.
Yes, I'm looking at you Lawri, Robin, Alec et al.
*****
Right.
You recently banned Tom on highly understandable grounds. However, I do believe what he did bares resemblence to what Phi11ip and Monkey Man did.
I'm not suggesting they should be banned, oh no, not at all, as they are creditable forum members.
But so was Tom.
To be fair, monkey man started it. Phi11ip followed on. No warning was given at all, and then Tom did it.
I just can't understand how Tom was banned, yet the former two were not.
This isn't an argumentitve post, on troublesome - merely a question of understaning.
Thanks.
Yes, I'm looking at you Lawri, Robin, Alec et al.
*****
Right.
You recently banned Tom on highly understandable grounds. However, I do believe what he did bares resemblence to what Phi11ip and Monkey Man did.
I'm not suggesting they should be banned, oh no, not at all, as they are creditable forum members.
But so was Tom.
To be fair, monkey man started it. Phi11ip followed on. No warning was given at all, and then Tom did it.
I just can't understand how Tom was banned, yet the former two were not.
This isn't an argumentitve post, on troublesome - merely a question of understaning.
Thanks.
Page:
Vitamin Gł wrote:
> And I 100% agree. In a way, it shows how messed up the SR Forums are.
> They can't even keep to one set of rules. It's always one thing for
> one user and a different for another.
In a thread that a staff member is going to almost certainly read is that a smart comment to make? Especially when Snuggly is on a banning bender! heh.
> And I 100% agree. In a way, it shows how messed up the SR Forums are.
> They can't even keep to one set of rules. It's always one thing for
> one user and a different for another.
In a thread that a staff member is going to almost certainly read is that a smart comment to make? Especially when Snuggly is on a banning bender! heh.
And I 100% agree. In a way, it shows how messed up the SR Forums are. They can't even keep to one set of rules. It's always one thing for one user and a different for another.
There is no such user as Mr. Snuggly.
AHA!
AHA!
For those of you who are *not* called Mr. Snuggly on the forums, ignore this. I don't want any retarded mongo's spamming this up.
Yes, I'm looking at you Lawri, Robin, Alec et al.
*****
Right.
You recently banned Tom on highly understandable grounds. However, I do believe what he did bares resemblence to what Phi11ip and Monkey Man did.
I'm not suggesting they should be banned, oh no, not at all, as they are creditable forum members.
But so was Tom.
To be fair, monkey man started it. Phi11ip followed on. No warning was given at all, and then Tom did it.
I just can't understand how Tom was banned, yet the former two were not.
This isn't an argumentitve post, on troublesome - merely a question of understaning.
Thanks.
Yes, I'm looking at you Lawri, Robin, Alec et al.
*****
Right.
You recently banned Tom on highly understandable grounds. However, I do believe what he did bares resemblence to what Phi11ip and Monkey Man did.
I'm not suggesting they should be banned, oh no, not at all, as they are creditable forum members.
But so was Tom.
To be fair, monkey man started it. Phi11ip followed on. No warning was given at all, and then Tom did it.
I just can't understand how Tom was banned, yet the former two were not.
This isn't an argumentitve post, on troublesome - merely a question of understaning.
Thanks.
Page: