Viewing Thread:
"Mr. Snuggly - A Question"

For those of you who are *not* called Mr. Snuggly on the forums, ignore this. I don't want any retarded mongo's spamming this up.
Yes, I'm looking at you Lawri, Robin, Alec et al.
*****

Right.

You recently banned Tom on highly understandable grounds. However, I do believe what he did bares resemblence to what Phi11ip and Monkey Man did.
I'm not suggesting they should be banned, oh no, not at all, as they are creditable forum members.

But so was Tom.

To be fair, monkey man started it. Phi11ip followed on. No warning was given at all, and then Tom did it.

I just can't understand how Tom was banned, yet the former two were not.

This isn't an argumentitve post, on troublesome - merely a question of understaning.
Thanks.

I thought you said 'n', and then people loved you so much that the whole English language was realigned to take your terrible proofreading into account .

monkey_man wrote:
> Vitamin G³ wrote:
> Why was Tom banned and Monkey Man warned? Unban Tom and warn him,
> otherwise, it's 'unfair'.
>
> Everyone was warned ages ago, and I did it ages before that. and it
> was original then. People loved it, and me. They wanted to make me
> their God, but I said n.

What I actually said was "No".

Vitamin G³ wrote:
> Why was Tom banned and Monkey Man warned? Unban Tom and warn him,
> otherwise, it's 'unfair'.

Everyone was warned ages ago, and I did it ages before that. and it was original then. People loved it, and me. They wanted to make me their God, but I said n.

Why was Tom banned and Monkey Man warned? Unban Tom and warn him, otherwise, it's 'unfair'.

SHEEPY wrote:
> The Darkness

*points and screams like in invasion of the body snatchers*

I agree and I don't even own a bum!

The Darkness

*Agrees*

(witty response)

Hoisted by my own pitard.