The "Freeola Customer Forum" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
For those of you who are *not* called Mr. Snuggly on the forums, ignore this. I don't want any retarded mongo's spamming this up.
Yes, I'm looking at you Lawri, Robin, Alec et al.
*****
Right.
You recently banned Tom on highly understandable grounds. However, I do believe what he did bares resemblence to what Phi11ip and Monkey Man did.
I'm not suggesting they should be banned, oh no, not at all, as they are creditable forum members.
But so was Tom.
To be fair, monkey man started it. Phi11ip followed on. No warning was given at all, and then Tom did it.
I just can't understand how Tom was banned, yet the former two were not.
This isn't an argumentitve post, on troublesome - merely a question of understaning.
Thanks.
Yes, I'm looking at you Lawri, Robin, Alec et al.
*****
Right.
You recently banned Tom on highly understandable grounds. However, I do believe what he did bares resemblence to what Phi11ip and Monkey Man did.
I'm not suggesting they should be banned, oh no, not at all, as they are creditable forum members.
But so was Tom.
To be fair, monkey man started it. Phi11ip followed on. No warning was given at all, and then Tom did it.
I just can't understand how Tom was banned, yet the former two were not.
This isn't an argumentitve post, on troublesome - merely a question of understaning.
Thanks.
Page:
For those of you who are *not* called Mr. Snuggly on the forums, ignore this. I don't want any retarded mongo's spamming this up.
Yes, I'm looking at you Lawri, Robin, Alec et al.
*****
Right.
You recently banned Tom on highly understandable grounds. However, I do believe what he did bares resemblence to what Phi11ip and Monkey Man did.
I'm not suggesting they should be banned, oh no, not at all, as they are creditable forum members.
But so was Tom.
To be fair, monkey man started it. Phi11ip followed on. No warning was given at all, and then Tom did it.
I just can't understand how Tom was banned, yet the former two were not.
This isn't an argumentitve post, on troublesome - merely a question of understaning.
Thanks.
Yes, I'm looking at you Lawri, Robin, Alec et al.
*****
Right.
You recently banned Tom on highly understandable grounds. However, I do believe what he did bares resemblence to what Phi11ip and Monkey Man did.
I'm not suggesting they should be banned, oh no, not at all, as they are creditable forum members.
But so was Tom.
To be fair, monkey man started it. Phi11ip followed on. No warning was given at all, and then Tom did it.
I just can't understand how Tom was banned, yet the former two were not.
This isn't an argumentitve post, on troublesome - merely a question of understaning.
Thanks.
There is no such user as Mr. Snuggly.
AHA!
AHA!
And I 100% agree. In a way, it shows how messed up the SR Forums are. They can't even keep to one set of rules. It's always one thing for one user and a different for another.
Vitamin Gł wrote:
> And I 100% agree. In a way, it shows how messed up the SR Forums are.
> They can't even keep to one set of rules. It's always one thing for
> one user and a different for another.
In a thread that a staff member is going to almost certainly read is that a smart comment to make? Especially when Snuggly is on a banning bender! heh.
> And I 100% agree. In a way, it shows how messed up the SR Forums are.
> They can't even keep to one set of rules. It's always one thing for
> one user and a different for another.
In a thread that a staff member is going to almost certainly read is that a smart comment to make? Especially when Snuggly is on a banning bender! heh.
If he bans me for that, it just goes to prove my point that little bit more. But what do they care? These forums are only here so they can get people to sign up and buy stuff from SR. They don't care if members who don't buy from them anymore (like myself) leave the forums because of a banning or whatever.
I'll reiterate my initial statement.
If your name is anything other than Mr.Snuggly/Mr. Snuggly - whatever, don't post in here and spam it up, m'kay?
If your name is anything other than Mr.Snuggly/Mr. Snuggly - whatever, don't post in here and spam it up, m'kay?
Azul wrote:
> This isn't an argumentitve post, on troublesome - merely a question
> of understaning.
;-)
> This isn't an argumentitve post, on troublesome - merely a question
> of understaning.
;-)
I wouldn't call what I wrote spam. I'm just adding MY input on the whole case. Do I really need to make a topic of my own?
I don't think Ali wants his addy put on the forums. But anyway, I know you was 'joking' but it gave me a chance to put my point across.
Alright fair do's.
Page: