The "Freeola Customer Forum" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
A while ago I read about a group of Iraqi asylum seekers who had attacked four royal marines whilst they were returning to their barracks.
One of the iraqis pulled out a knife and stabbed one of the marines, so the another marines obviously try to defend their mate who had just been stabbed.
The marines were holding a *kit sale* that day and this was to auction off for charity their dead mates stuff (he had died in a copter crash in Iraq).
Anyways one of the Asylum seekers has put in a complaint against a marine because the marine had assaulted him - even though he was part of the group that had ambushed the marines and he had been arrested two days before for carrying a knife.
What SHOULD happened is the Iraqis should be kicked out the country straight away and the complaint against the marine dropped. What WILL happen is the Iraqi will get a few grand for all the distress that has occured to him and the marine will proberbly be up for a court Martial.
We will have to wait and see what happens.
One of the iraqis pulled out a knife and stabbed one of the marines, so the another marines obviously try to defend their mate who had just been stabbed.
The marines were holding a *kit sale* that day and this was to auction off for charity their dead mates stuff (he had died in a copter crash in Iraq).
Anyways one of the Asylum seekers has put in a complaint against a marine because the marine had assaulted him - even though he was part of the group that had ambushed the marines and he had been arrested two days before for carrying a knife.
What SHOULD happened is the Iraqis should be kicked out the country straight away and the complaint against the marine dropped. What WILL happen is the Iraqi will get a few grand for all the distress that has occured to him and the marine will proberbly be up for a court Martial.
We will have to wait and see what happens.
Page:
Cubist wrote:
> By the way how can Iraqis hijacking a plane under Osama bin ladens
> name not be by Iraq? A ruler speaks for his country and the ruler was
> Suddam who fully endorses Osama.
You have no idea how foolish you are. Go away, before you seriously offend someone.
> By the way how can Iraqis hijacking a plane under Osama bin ladens
> name not be by Iraq? A ruler speaks for his country and the ruler was
> Suddam who fully endorses Osama.
You have no idea how foolish you are. Go away, before you seriously offend someone.
And that is relevant because....?
By the way how can Iraqis hijacking a plane under Osama bin ladens name not be by Iraq? A ruler speaks for his country and the ruler was Suddam who fully endorses Osama.
Yes you do realise that I'm in 5th year and sitting 5 Highers? In England that's the equivalent of being in 12th year and sitting all your A-Levels for university.
Because he needs to be in Chat, not here.
On another note, why don't we just all consider Cubist a product of our nation's fine educational system and leave it at that eh ?
RastaBillySkank wrote:
> They weren't collecting any at all as far as I'm concerned. Has one
> shred of evidence been found anywhere that links Iraq and Husseins
> regime to procurement or manufactor of WoMD?
You need to clarify, there is no direct evidence of the manufacture of WMD post 1991, there is evidence of it and procurement pre 1991, and evidence of the pursuance of WMD post 1991. All 'we' lack is the actual weapons themselves. I hav no doubt they existed, question is are they hidden, destroyed, or transported elsewhere ? Whatever the answer there will be someone who was involved and they won't keep quiet indefinitely.
> They weren't collecting any at all as far as I'm concerned. Has one
> shred of evidence been found anywhere that links Iraq and Husseins
> regime to procurement or manufactor of WoMD?
You need to clarify, there is no direct evidence of the manufacture of WMD post 1991, there is evidence of it and procurement pre 1991, and evidence of the pursuance of WMD post 1991. All 'we' lack is the actual weapons themselves. I hav no doubt they existed, question is are they hidden, destroyed, or transported elsewhere ? Whatever the answer there will be someone who was involved and they won't keep quiet indefinitely.
Cubist wrote:
> 3 - Do I have any proof that Iraqis have bombed us, shot at us etc?!?!
> Are you mad man? There's mountains of footage that has been on the
> news of Iraqi citizens shooting at American and Brittish troops and
> crashing a plane full of highly explosive fuel into two buildings
> causing the plane to explode and the buildings to topple is hardly an
> act of friendship.
THAT WAS NOT IRAQ.
> 3 - Do I have any proof that Iraqis have bombed us, shot at us etc?!?!
> Are you mad man? There's mountains of footage that has been on the
> news of Iraqi citizens shooting at American and Brittish troops and
> crashing a plane full of highly explosive fuel into two buildings
> causing the plane to explode and the buildings to topple is hardly an
> act of friendship.
THAT WAS NOT IRAQ.
Sorry about any typos and small spelling errors like "Brittish" should obviously be "British". I was trying to touch type but haven't quite got the hang of it.
Ok lets tackle your points one by one-
1 - No I'm not saying Iraqi blood is less important than British and American blood what I am saying though is that we have leveled many of their cities with missiles, bombs etc anyway so we might as well have done it from a remote distance where they couldn't fight back. Baghdad is a waste land for example.
2 - There's no shred of evidence? How about the barrels of chemical's for bio weapons they found burried in the ground near Baghdad? There's so much land to cover that they could have burried anything there and it would never be found. They even found another bio weapons factory that had recently been emptied except for a chair which said on the back "Chemical Supervisor" (once translated). Not very sly of them...
3 - Do I have any proof that Iraqis have bombed us, shot at us etc?!?! Are you mad man? There's mountains of footage that has been on the news of Iraqi citizens shooting at American and Brittish troops and crashing a plane full of highly explosive fuel into two buildings causing the plane to explode and the buildings to topple is hardly an act of friendship.
1 - No I'm not saying Iraqi blood is less important than British and American blood what I am saying though is that we have leveled many of their cities with missiles, bombs etc anyway so we might as well have done it from a remote distance where they couldn't fight back. Baghdad is a waste land for example.
2 - There's no shred of evidence? How about the barrels of chemical's for bio weapons they found burried in the ground near Baghdad? There's so much land to cover that they could have burried anything there and it would never be found. They even found another bio weapons factory that had recently been emptied except for a chair which said on the back "Chemical Supervisor" (once translated). Not very sly of them...
3 - Do I have any proof that Iraqis have bombed us, shot at us etc?!?! Are you mad man? There's mountains of footage that has been on the news of Iraqi citizens shooting at American and Brittish troops and crashing a plane full of highly explosive fuel into two buildings causing the plane to explode and the buildings to topple is hardly an act of friendship.
Page: