Viewing Thread:
"You could have seen this coming a mile away..."

A while ago I read about a group of Iraqi asylum seekers who had attacked four royal marines whilst they were returning to their barracks.
One of the iraqis pulled out a knife and stabbed one of the marines, so the another marines obviously try to defend their mate who had just been stabbed.

The marines were holding a *kit sale* that day and this was to auction off for charity their dead mates stuff (he had died in a copter crash in Iraq).
Anyways one of the Asylum seekers has put in a complaint against a marine because the marine had assaulted him - even though he was part of the group that had ambushed the marines and he had been arrested two days before for carrying a knife.
What SHOULD happened is the Iraqis should be kicked out the country straight away and the complaint against the marine dropped. What WILL happen is the Iraqi will get a few grand for all the distress that has occured to him and the marine will proberbly be up for a court Martial.

We will have to wait and see what happens.

Cubist wrote:
> I'm sorry, unfortunately they don't let 15 year olds interview
> terrorists and search for nuclear weapons. The whole sensorship of the
> news as well doesn't help with getting me evidence but there is enough
> to come to conclusions.

I'm asking you to post direct links proving Iraq was behind 9/11. Post me one link to a reputable site and then I'll believe you.

Or just act the goat (sorry Goatboy) which is what you're doing.

I understand why you are all saying what you are saying and I am acknowledging it yet you wont acknowledge what I say. You just insult me and dismiss it.

Maybe this analogy will help get my views across -

How do you protect a flock of sheep?
You kill the wolf
Woolf's travel in packs though
How do protect the sheep then?
Kill all the wolfs

That's how we handle it with animals and when I saw the two towers crumbling to the ground, saw people jumping out the windows as the fire climber to the top it really made me think that we aren't so different from them.

Cubist's posts read the same as Bell's to me, just without the links and sneering at differing ideas.

You just summed it up perfectly. You have drawn conclusions on the limited edited coverage you have been given.

Unbeliever wrote:
> You stinking fool. How can you possibly say that Iraqi organised the
> 9/11 attacks when the majority of people orchestrating it were Saudi
> Arabians?
>
> All people living in the middle east should be nuked? All asians
> killed?
>
> Your stupid Daily Mail rash generalisations are pathetic and
> infantile. Not once do you back your wild fabrications with a shred of
> proof yet you expect everyone to believe your wild assertions.
>
> You are specious idiot.

I'm sorry, unfortunately they don't let 15 year olds interview terrorists and search for nuclear weapons. The whole sensorship of the news as well doesn't help with getting me evidence but there is enough to come to conclusions.

Cubist wrote:
> Well we are in the intelligent discussion forum.

Exactly. So show some intelligence when making your outlandish claims.

If you want you can just focus on my most recent post with my views in it? I think I summed up my views in it.

You stinking fool. How can you possibly say that Iraqi organised the 9/11 attacks when the majority of people orchestrating it were Saudi Arabians?

All people living in the middle east should be nuked? All asians killed?

Your stupid Daily Mail rash generalisations are pathetic and infantile. Not once do you back your wild fabrications with a shred of proof yet you expect everyone to believe your wild assertions.

You are specious idiot.

Well we are in the intelligent discussion forum. I'm sure you'll use your vast knowledge to show me the error of my ways in frank and intellectual way?

Stop and think for a second. Just one. Please.

I could go through all your posts and try and point out how much of a misguided idiot you are, but I wouldn't know where to start.