The "Freeola Customer Forum" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
Chat about Smackdown
Page:
So then you first.........
Sorry, not interested in a childish bicker-bicker, come back when you're ready to discuss Professional Wrestling, toodles.
Shooby wrote:
> Your inaccurate judgements amuse me. When TNA was better in
> booking and quality of wrestling, I praised the product, and
> likewise criticised WWE. Now the tide has turned. Simple.
Once again you're being a conceited moron who can't see anything but the inside of his ass who think's he's the first, middle and last authority of wrestling who won't listen to anyones opinion who disagrees with you as you believe yourself to be the totally acurate view of wrestling today.
> As for the copy pasting of Meltzer, I believe this is the first
> time you have done so.....you usually stick to rajah.com
They're the same really as they quote each others news.
> And for the record, I never referred to you as a mark, and idiot
> perhaps, but never a mark.
If you want me to find the various posts where you referred to me and others as a "marky marky mark etc etc......." I could do but I won't waste my time.
As for the idiot bit I enjoy my wrestling I'm just not married to it left right and centre like you are I have other passtimes to amuse myself with.
> Your inaccurate judgements amuse me. When TNA was better in
> booking and quality of wrestling, I praised the product, and
> likewise criticised WWE. Now the tide has turned. Simple.
Once again you're being a conceited moron who can't see anything but the inside of his ass who think's he's the first, middle and last authority of wrestling who won't listen to anyones opinion who disagrees with you as you believe yourself to be the totally acurate view of wrestling today.
> As for the copy pasting of Meltzer, I believe this is the first
> time you have done so.....you usually stick to rajah.com
They're the same really as they quote each others news.
> And for the record, I never referred to you as a mark, and idiot
> perhaps, but never a mark.
If you want me to find the various posts where you referred to me and others as a "marky marky mark etc etc......." I could do but I won't waste my time.
As for the idiot bit I enjoy my wrestling I'm just not married to it left right and centre like you are I have other passtimes to amuse myself with.
Your inaccurate judgements amuse me. When TNA was better in booking and quality of wrestling, I praised the product, and likewise criticised WWE. Now the tide has turned. Simple.
As for the copy pasting of Meltzer, I believe this is the first time you have done so.....you usually stick to rajah.com
And for the record, I never referred to you as a mark, and idiot perhaps, but never a mark.
As for the copy pasting of Meltzer, I believe this is the first time you have done so.....you usually stick to rajah.com
And for the record, I never referred to you as a mark, and idiot perhaps, but never a mark.
Shooby wrote:
> Oh and Smedlos, we already discussed this news on the Backlash
> thread, so there is no need to copy-paste Meltzer all the
> time...
Right so I always copy and paste all his reports on here then do I? When was the last time I did that?
I just saw the report and posted it here hoping to get some discussion as this forum needs some activity going by the number of posts recently.
Going by your posts over the past year or so I'm shocked you're even lowering yourself to discussing the WWE with the "marks" on here.
Has TNA gotten so bad you're lowering yourself to our level?
> Oh and Smedlos, we already discussed this news on the Backlash
> thread, so there is no need to copy-paste Meltzer all the
> time...
Right so I always copy and paste all his reports on here then do I? When was the last time I did that?
I just saw the report and posted it here hoping to get some discussion as this forum needs some activity going by the number of posts recently.
Going by your posts over the past year or so I'm shocked you're even lowering yourself to discussing the WWE with the "marks" on here.
Has TNA gotten so bad you're lowering yourself to our level?
Thats why I think they may use Kennedys Money in the bank, and they could have a great feud over the title when 'Taker returns.
His credibility goes way down if he loses it aswell, so meh.
I wouldn't like to see 'Taker relinquish the title either, his title reign would lose a bit of credibility if he relinquished it so soon after winning it. Who Knows?
Taker relinquishing would be stale and uninteresting, but hey, we could speculate all day about this and probably still be suprised by the creative direction they decide to take.
I wish they would give Chris Benoit a push and have him win the title. The thing with Kennedy is it would look a bit foolish to have Kennedy Cash in the Money in the bank straight after he announced on RAW he would be cashing it in at WM24. Somehow though i can't see them giving Batista the title. Maybe 'Taker will relinquish the title just like Batista did?
Page: