The "Freeola Customer Forum" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
The Americans are insane. After all, a nation can only be as good as its leader, and we all know who leads America. The American government listens to just one man, no one else is involved in decision making and no one else matters.
The people, ah yes, the people of America are simply blindly following their leader as the German people followed Hitler and they have no thought for anyone but themselves. There are no Americans that oppose this war with Iraq, because, of course, it affects them all personally.
There was no complaint made against Bush during this whole war march in America, no-one supports the other side and anyone who speaks out should be hung, this is the land of the brave after all, and it’s not brave to support the enemy.
Bush himself has single-handedly pushed the world in to war because of his own personal quest, but it’s clear that all America is behind him. I asked 3 Americans what they thought and they were both adamant that they would support Bush. 3 Separate people with the same view, so that proves beyond doubt that America is a brainwashed mass of zombies who are arrogant and rude (one put the phone down without saying goodbye).
And then there’s the French. Not content with speaking English, they make up their own language. And that Chirac, he’s to blame for all of it. Chirac has stood up to America for his own personal reasons. I’ve heard from a friend down the road that he personally has an account to sell weapons to Iraq and is good friends with Saddam himself.
The French people are all arrogant and smell of Garlic. I know this first-hand, because I went to get some wine from France and met a bunch of French people while I was there. All they do is complain about the English and how we invade their country. Well, we should have finished them off like in that Henry V film and made the place ours.
It’s nearly as bad with the Spanish, they steal all our fish and accuse us of being moaning when we complain about it. We pay their wages, all those holidays we take, they should be grateful to us.
The people, ah yes, the people of America are simply blindly following their leader as the German people followed Hitler and they have no thought for anyone but themselves. There are no Americans that oppose this war with Iraq, because, of course, it affects them all personally.
There was no complaint made against Bush during this whole war march in America, no-one supports the other side and anyone who speaks out should be hung, this is the land of the brave after all, and it’s not brave to support the enemy.
Bush himself has single-handedly pushed the world in to war because of his own personal quest, but it’s clear that all America is behind him. I asked 3 Americans what they thought and they were both adamant that they would support Bush. 3 Separate people with the same view, so that proves beyond doubt that America is a brainwashed mass of zombies who are arrogant and rude (one put the phone down without saying goodbye).
And then there’s the French. Not content with speaking English, they make up their own language. And that Chirac, he’s to blame for all of it. Chirac has stood up to America for his own personal reasons. I’ve heard from a friend down the road that he personally has an account to sell weapons to Iraq and is good friends with Saddam himself.
The French people are all arrogant and smell of Garlic. I know this first-hand, because I went to get some wine from France and met a bunch of French people while I was there. All they do is complain about the English and how we invade their country. Well, we should have finished them off like in that Henry V film and made the place ours.
It’s nearly as bad with the Spanish, they steal all our fish and accuse us of being moaning when we complain about it. We pay their wages, all those holidays we take, they should be grateful to us.
Page:
pb wrote:
> I asked 3 Americans what they thought and they were both adamant that
> they would support Bush.
Meh. Wouldn't it be "all of them" as there are three? It would be "both" if there were two :)
Sorry for being a smartass, but that made me look twice :D
> I asked 3 Americans what they thought and they were both adamant that
> they would support Bush.
Meh. Wouldn't it be "all of them" as there are three? It would be "both" if there were two :)
Sorry for being a smartass, but that made me look twice :D
Jonman wrote:
> Just to chuck a spanner in the works, during the first Gulf conflict,
> Iraq offerred to withdraw from Kuwait if the UN addressed the issue of
> Israel occupying and bombing Lebanon.
Just to chuck another spanner in the works, would it not have set a bad precedent if the UN was to address issues based on who could invade another nation to force a point ? What next, Al Queda offered not to kill another pile of civilians in America in exchange for the UN debating the breakup of America ? Insane.
Lets not forget that the Iraqi regime began all this back in 1990, don't start what you cannot finish. Saddam gambled on a weak international response back then, and lost, because America led the way, as it is doing now.
On another note, Hans Blix deserves credit this weekend by forcing the point about the illegal missiles, Iraq has until 1st MArch to prove it is going to destroy all of them, or yet another piece of evidence shouting MATERIAL BREACH gets added to the pile. However, Iraq won't, I believe, get rid of them because to do so gets rid of a good weapon they're going to need. Catch 22 really.
~~Belldandy~~
> Just to chuck a spanner in the works, during the first Gulf conflict,
> Iraq offerred to withdraw from Kuwait if the UN addressed the issue of
> Israel occupying and bombing Lebanon.
Just to chuck another spanner in the works, would it not have set a bad precedent if the UN was to address issues based on who could invade another nation to force a point ? What next, Al Queda offered not to kill another pile of civilians in America in exchange for the UN debating the breakup of America ? Insane.
Lets not forget that the Iraqi regime began all this back in 1990, don't start what you cannot finish. Saddam gambled on a weak international response back then, and lost, because America led the way, as it is doing now.
On another note, Hans Blix deserves credit this weekend by forcing the point about the illegal missiles, Iraq has until 1st MArch to prove it is going to destroy all of them, or yet another piece of evidence shouting MATERIAL BREACH gets added to the pile. However, Iraq won't, I believe, get rid of them because to do so gets rid of a good weapon they're going to need. Catch 22 really.
~~Belldandy~~
Can I hate everyone too please?
Page: