The "General Games Chat" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
Hello, I'm back to post and stuff.
Do people still argue over consoles?
Do people still argue over consoles?
Page:
Bonus wrote:
> Still, no one has told me why Killer 7 is a worse game on PS2 than GC,
> other than it takes longer to load.
That's reason enough, now hush.
> Still, no one has told me why Killer 7 is a worse game on PS2 than GC,
> other than it takes longer to load.
That's reason enough, now hush.
Yes, GC triggers are >>>> than the PS2 ones.
Mainly because you can actually tell when you've pushed them in all the way - which is mostly why they rock for FPSs, because omg!1 it's like a gun! - whereas with the PS2, anything that's pressure sensitive, you end up straining your fingers in half trying to get the most pressure on it.
Mainly because you can actually tell when you've pushed them in all the way - which is mostly why they rock for FPSs, because omg!1 it's like a gun! - whereas with the PS2, anything that's pressure sensitive, you end up straining your fingers in half trying to get the most pressure on it.
Still, no one has told me why Killer 7 is a worse game on PS2 than GC, other than it takes longer to load.
No, it wasn't the ISS games, it was the american version of Pro Evo.
Did I start a console war?
(I'm Alliance btw)
(I'm Alliance btw)
gerrid wrote:
> Bonus wrote:
> Wrong, it's worse for first person games,
>
> No way, no way. The main analog stick is in the wrong place, for a
> start.
It does have two proper analogue sticks which are symmetrical in layout making coordination between your hands better, in my opinion.
This is based on having played Timesplitters on all three consoles too ;-).
> Bonus wrote:
> Wrong, it's worse for first person games,
>
> No way, no way. The main analog stick is in the wrong place, for a
> start.
It does have two proper analogue sticks which are symmetrical in layout making coordination between your hands better, in my opinion.
This is based on having played Timesplitters on all three consoles too ;-).
Bonus wrote:
> No, Konami's american one ;-). My mate's got it. Can't remember
> what that was called though ;-D.
ISS2/3? They're rubbish.
> No, Konami's american one ;-). My mate's got it. Can't remember
> what that was called though ;-D.
ISS2/3? They're rubbish.
Bonus wrote:
> The GCs shoulder buttons click, the PS2s don't and are pressure
> sensitive, maybe you had a broken pad last time you touched one.
Don't tell me you don't understand what I'm saying... the travel of the GC analog buttons is what makes them satisfying. The PS2 buttons only have a short travel and are like any other button, and just aren't as satisfying imo.
> The GCs shoulder buttons click, the PS2s don't and are pressure
> sensitive, maybe you had a broken pad last time you touched one.
Don't tell me you don't understand what I'm saying... the travel of the GC analog buttons is what makes them satisfying. The PS2 buttons only have a short travel and are like any other button, and just aren't as satisfying imo.
Dringo wrote:
> Ah so you've played Pro Evo on the Gamecube have you? :D
>
> (he's gonna tell me he imported Winning Eleven isn't he??)
No, Konami's american one ;-). My mate's got it. Can't remember what that was called though ;-D.
> Ah so you've played Pro Evo on the Gamecube have you? :D
>
> (he's gonna tell me he imported Winning Eleven isn't he??)
No, Konami's american one ;-). My mate's got it. Can't remember what that was called though ;-D.
Bonus wrote:
> That wouldn't be a hardware problem
He never said it was a hardware problem. He's just pointing out that games built specifically for one platform don't generally translate well onto others.
> That wouldn't be a hardware problem
He never said it was a hardware problem. He's just pointing out that games built specifically for one platform don't generally translate well onto others.
Page: