The "General Games Chat" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
This thread has been linked to the game 'Conflict Global Storm'.
Anyone picked this up ? Just wondering cause it has online co-op. My friend just bought it and also bought the game for me too. Should be fun gunning down terrorists. The reviews have had alot of praise for it.
I'll be going online with it soon for some co-op with my friend. Hope the medals are still in the game. ;-)
I'll be going online with it soon for some co-op with my friend. Hope the medals are still in the game. ;-)
Page:
English Redneck wrote:
> Hedfix - just post on here when you wanna get on Conflict.
Might be on in a bit, not entirely sure.
> Hedfix - just post on here when you wanna get on Conflict.
Might be on in a bit, not entirely sure.
lcarus wrote:
> Hedfix of all people, telling me to get laid and calling me pathetic.
> Ask anyone here (except Redneck) if that's just a tad perverse.
> Meanwhile, reverse the roles. You're bombarding me back with blind,
> personal insults, when all I've done is comment on your behaviour on
> here and how it affects you. Then you label that as a personal
> attack. Hed, you don't even realise you're doing the stuff you're
> blabbering on.
--------------------------- ------------------------
lcarus wrote:
> English Redneck wrote:
> At the
> moment its all about the people who just play a title non stop and
> don't eat or sleep.
>
> As in, plays games all day? I wonder who does that around here.
lcarus wrote:
> Hedfix wrote:
> Playtesters.
>
> But they have jobs.
lcarus wrote:
> Actually, playtesters have set hours. UNLIKE SOME
lcarus wrote:
> 24 hours a day on here? Naaaa.
------------------------------- -----------------------------
>
> So you're justifying your status to the online world by saying you
> have a real life - girlfriend, activities, etc. I don't know if you
> really have one or not, but if you do, I'd suggest you spend more
> time with her.
Oh man, I've been with her all day. Where's yours... oh right.
> Because everyone I *do* know with a proper life
So, just work colleagues then?
> doesn't make it their priority to prove to teenagers online that he
> really does lead a fulfilled life.
and neither do I, as you may have noticed I've been taking the pee out of your rather obvious trolling.
And Hedfix... scrap the "on
> when there's adverts" lie. You're on whenever you have the
> chance to "humour" a topic. Someone just disagreed with
> you? Oh, you're right there in seconds.
'fraid not. Today I've been watching tv episodes on the comp and browsing the forums when I've taken a break/in-between episodes.
But do continue with this pathetic attempt at a personal attack. It's like you're ******* into the wind and it's coming back and making you reek something awful.
Anyway it's fun watching you deny trying to provoke me with continual personal attacks but as we can see from the quotes above you're quite the hypocrite.
Re-reading some of those quotes.. your jealousy is quite apparent too.
> Hedfix of all people, telling me to get laid and calling me pathetic.
> Ask anyone here (except Redneck) if that's just a tad perverse.
> Meanwhile, reverse the roles. You're bombarding me back with blind,
> personal insults, when all I've done is comment on your behaviour on
> here and how it affects you. Then you label that as a personal
> attack. Hed, you don't even realise you're doing the stuff you're
> blabbering on.
--------------------------- ------------------------
lcarus wrote:
> English Redneck wrote:
> At the
> moment its all about the people who just play a title non stop and
> don't eat or sleep.
>
> As in, plays games all day? I wonder who does that around here.
lcarus wrote:
> Hedfix wrote:
> Playtesters.
>
> But they have jobs.
lcarus wrote:
> Actually, playtesters have set hours. UNLIKE SOME
lcarus wrote:
> 24 hours a day on here? Naaaa.
------------------------------- -----------------------------
>
> So you're justifying your status to the online world by saying you
> have a real life - girlfriend, activities, etc. I don't know if you
> really have one or not, but if you do, I'd suggest you spend more
> time with her.
Oh man, I've been with her all day. Where's yours... oh right.
> Because everyone I *do* know with a proper life
So, just work colleagues then?
> doesn't make it their priority to prove to teenagers online that he
> really does lead a fulfilled life.
and neither do I, as you may have noticed I've been taking the pee out of your rather obvious trolling.
And Hedfix... scrap the "on
> when there's adverts" lie. You're on whenever you have the
> chance to "humour" a topic. Someone just disagreed with
> you? Oh, you're right there in seconds.
'fraid not. Today I've been watching tv episodes on the comp and browsing the forums when I've taken a break/in-between episodes.
But do continue with this pathetic attempt at a personal attack. It's like you're ******* into the wind and it's coming back and making you reek something awful.
Anyway it's fun watching you deny trying to provoke me with continual personal attacks but as we can see from the quotes above you're quite the hypocrite.
Re-reading some of those quotes.. your jealousy is quite apparent too.
Hedfix of all people, telling me to get laid and calling me pathetic. Ask anyone here (except Redneck) if that's just a tad perverse. Meanwhile, reverse the roles. You're bombarding me back with blind, personal insults, when all I've done is comment on your behaviour on here and how it affects you. Then you label that as a personal attack. Hed, you don't even realise you're doing the stuff you're blabbering on.
So you're justifying your status to the online world by saying you have a real life - girlfriend, activities, etc. I don't know if you really have one or not, but if you do, I'd suggest you spend more time with her. Because everyone I *do* know with a proper life doesn't make it their priority to prove to teenagers online that he really does lead a fulfilled life. And Hedfix... scrap the "on when there's adverts" lie. You're on whenever you have the chance to "humour" a topic. Someone just disagreed with you? Oh, you're right there in seconds.
Redneck, move away from the "think you're cool" reply and come up with something that makes sense. Without damaging your own coolness, of course.
So you're justifying your status to the online world by saying you have a real life - girlfriend, activities, etc. I don't know if you really have one or not, but if you do, I'd suggest you spend more time with her. Because everyone I *do* know with a proper life doesn't make it their priority to prove to teenagers online that he really does lead a fulfilled life. And Hedfix... scrap the "on when there's adverts" lie. You're on whenever you have the chance to "humour" a topic. Someone just disagreed with you? Oh, you're right there in seconds.
Redneck, move away from the "think you're cool" reply and come up with something that makes sense. Without damaging your own coolness, of course.
Hedfix - just post on here when you wanna get on Conflict.
lcarus wrote:
> Redneck, stop with the act. I realise you have to listen to the guy
> on Live constantly, but I would have thought you could think for
> yourself.
Act ? Coming from the "I'm so cool with my prepubescent whining" guy. Classic.
> Redneck, stop with the act. I realise you have to listen to the guy
> on Live constantly, but I would have thought you could think for
> yourself.
Act ? Coming from the "I'm so cool with my prepubescent whining" guy. Classic.
Tiltawhirl wrote:
>
> The day I saw IGN criticising Serious Sam 2 because it didn't have
> havok physics, was the day I realised these idiots really don't have
> a clue.
The best quote I've ever seen from IGN is from IGN's review of Future Tactics:
"The only variation from the "plain with various rock outcroppings" motif are the few levels that take place near towns."
Yeah so that'll be ignoring the levels where you fight on a motorway bridge, in a cave, the 3/4 levels where you fight in an alien spaceship, on a beach and the fact about a quarter of the game consists of 'town levels' then?
Methinks a certain reviewer thought they could blag a review having only played a quarter of the game they were 'reviewing'...
>
> The day I saw IGN criticising Serious Sam 2 because it didn't have
> havok physics, was the day I realised these idiots really don't have
> a clue.
The best quote I've ever seen from IGN is from IGN's review of Future Tactics:
"The only variation from the "plain with various rock outcroppings" motif are the few levels that take place near towns."
Yeah so that'll be ignoring the levels where you fight on a motorway bridge, in a cave, the 3/4 levels where you fight in an alien spaceship, on a beach and the fact about a quarter of the game consists of 'town levels' then?
Methinks a certain reviewer thought they could blag a review having only played a quarter of the game they were 'reviewing'...
Tiltawhirl wrote:
> Stupid idiots!
>
> You're making me want this game.
Yes, you really do need this game. Quite possibly the best co-op ever.
> Stupid idiots!
>
> You're making me want this game.
Yes, you really do need this game. Quite possibly the best co-op ever.
Cycloon wrote:
> I think the one thing that proves websites don't know what they're on
> about is the fact Gamespot have never ever rated the series. Never
> played Vietnam, heard it's bad, but they gripe at the first two cos
> of bad AI etc, regardless of the fact they're a lot of fun to play.
> And ARE actually good.
The day I saw IGN criticising Serious Sam 2 because it didn't have havok physics, was the day I realised these idiots really don't have a clue.
> I think the one thing that proves websites don't know what they're on
> about is the fact Gamespot have never ever rated the series. Never
> played Vietnam, heard it's bad, but they gripe at the first two cos
> of bad AI etc, regardless of the fact they're a lot of fun to play.
> And ARE actually good.
The day I saw IGN criticising Serious Sam 2 because it didn't have havok physics, was the day I realised these idiots really don't have a clue.
lcarus wrote:
> Hedfix wrote:
>
> I believe me and Redneck both have girlfriends
>
> AHAHAHAHAHA
>
> Just wanted to quote that, pure genius.
Yeah, if you're familiar with some basic ideas from Descartes' writings.
> Hedfix wrote:
>
> I believe me and Redneck both have girlfriends
>
> AHAHAHAHAHA
>
> Just wanted to quote that, pure genius.
Yeah, if you're familiar with some basic ideas from Descartes' writings.
Wow, you really need to get laid.
I love this weak attempt at a personal attack. I come on for about 2 hours a day and refesh the site inbetween the adverts of whatever I'm watching in the evening to see what's going on.
I don't know what's going on in your life at the moment Icarus but coming on here and using your limited intelligence to start a weak personal attack just shows how pathetic and lonely you currently are.
How about you arrange to go out with some work colleagues (it's clear you actually have no friends) and see if you can actually rustle up some company for your lonely nights instead of creating weak personal attacks at gone 5 in the morning?
I love this weak attempt at a personal attack. I come on for about 2 hours a day and refesh the site inbetween the adverts of whatever I'm watching in the evening to see what's going on.
I don't know what's going on in your life at the moment Icarus but coming on here and using your limited intelligence to start a weak personal attack just shows how pathetic and lonely you currently are.
How about you arrange to go out with some work colleagues (it's clear you actually have no friends) and see if you can actually rustle up some company for your lonely nights instead of creating weak personal attacks at gone 5 in the morning?
Page: