The "General Games Chat" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
This thread has been linked to the game 'Metal Gear Solid'.
Which one is better ?
Page:
look metal gear is the best game to get! you never know this could happen in REAL life!!!!!!!!!!!
real....my bad but you got to admit that it is true
METAL GEAR SOLID
mgs is the best becuase there is a story plot to it and some of you can relate to. plus some will make you feel good even cry if snake was reel he would be the best soldier in the world
I'd go for Metal Gear Solid.
Yeah, i agree contrary to my last post.
I think people are losing sight of the fact that MGS isn't supposed to be 'realistic'.
Splinter Cell is based on real-life black-ops. MGS is a similar style, but is more based on Japanese Manga - hence the giant robots the game takes its name from.
Other than the fact that they both have a stealth aspect, they're really quite different games.
Splinter Cell is based on real-life black-ops. MGS is a similar style, but is more based on Japanese Manga - hence the giant robots the game takes its name from.
Other than the fact that they both have a stealth aspect, they're really quite different games.
Well i've got both mgs3 and splintercell 1 and 3, 1 does get tedious but 3 is genius.
In some parts splintercell is more realistic, for instance life but unrealistic for instance talking by sam fisher when your just about to grab a guard but the story line is really really bad.
But in mgs3 you actually get wounds and have to eat but it does have electric guys, and guys who go invisible, but thats to make it more interesting and challenging. It also has a greater array of weapons. Splintercell is extreme stealth for those who like just stealth. But mgs3 is for people who both enjoy action and stealth and has a better story line.
Because of this i believe that mgs is better as being more inventive, realsitic and having a far better story line.
In some parts splintercell is more realistic, for instance life but unrealistic for instance talking by sam fisher when your just about to grab a guard but the story line is really really bad.
But in mgs3 you actually get wounds and have to eat but it does have electric guys, and guys who go invisible, but thats to make it more interesting and challenging. It also has a greater array of weapons. Splintercell is extreme stealth for those who like just stealth. But mgs3 is for people who both enjoy action and stealth and has a better story line.
Because of this i believe that mgs is better as being more inventive, realsitic and having a far better story line.
Sort of but if you play Winback's multi you can see how it can be done well.
Page: