The "General Games Chat" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
Grow up you immature little troll.
I think they only gave it that because if it was really good and they gave it a really low score they would be a bit embarrased, especially seeming how good MGS was.
Fair enough, but when MGS3 only got 9/10 than summat is horribly wrong. MGS3 is 10 times better than MGS2
> How much of the game is the tanker level anyway? If it's roughly half
> then that's way too short.
A quarter at the most unfortunately.
> No, I was saying I thought the Tanker level wasn't up to much
> considering how short the game was.
>
> A much bigger level was needed.
>
> How much of the game is the tanker level anyway? If it's roughly half
> then that's way too short.
Oh yeah..sorry! the Tanker level was no way half of the game. The main part of it was the plant, the bit with gay-hated-wig-wearing-Raiden...the other character.
A much bigger level was needed.
How much of the game is the tanker level anyway? If it's roughly half then that's way too short.