The "Freeola Customer Forum" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
What do you think? Please none of this humanitarian crap defending them though - humanitarianism wasn't high on the two in question when they committed the crime, was it?
> I never said "all crime" I said most violent crime. Blue
> collar crime. Working class crime. Basically, muggings, attacks, armed
> robbery etc etc. Almost all crimes with victims are working class
> crimes
Erm, but how would wiping out the working class (or working class attitudes) have stopped those two girls (which sparked off this whole debate) from getting murdered...? That crime certainly had victims, and the killers had nothing to gain from the attack.
Also, you are mistaking something having no victims with the victims not being physically harmed. If someone perpertrates credit card fraud for instance and spend a ton of your cash, that's hardly victimless. And my point still stands that you cannot eradicate a social class in our class system without eradicating the entire class system. The only reason the middle class don't feel as though they're on the bottom of the pile is because there is the working class- eradicate working class attitudes etc. so they effectively become 'like' middle class people but with a bit less cash and the middle class begins to feel it's on the bottom of the pile, etc. etc.
You cannot just erase one level of a class structure without the whole thing collapsing.
c.b.
same thing could happen with the loss of a life, but that is a little more serious
> MoJo, how do you propose you do away with the working class?
-------
I'm not talking about getting rid of them, I'm talking about taking away their tendancies, their deviance etc. Working class people don't HAVE to commit crimes, and those that do it usually do it because they want the things they can't have. Move a working class family into a middle class environment, and I'm sure that the next generation that live there won't be as deviant as the last, then the next generation even less.
The government and councils like to stick all the working class and known trouble maker families together, which is the worst thing they can do. Demolish the slums and mix the so called trouble making families in with the more "normal" neighbourhoods. I'm sure someone's going to ask me if I would like a known criminal family in my street, and I wouldn't like it, but if it's one step in the right direction to getting rid of the majority of crime, then so be it
Then all we'd have would be white collar crime, which doesn't have many REAL victims (as opposed to an old lady being murdered in her own home)
> how do you propose you do away with the working class?
One day advanced robots who don't complain and are highly efficient will replace these classes, whether this is good or bad is anyones guess.
Well maybe.
The aim of capital punishment must always be to reduce crime. That is the aim of all punitive measures taken against criminals. Most of you seem to want it as a form of retribution. And that is wrong. It's just murder in a different, legalised guise. It enforces the division between the state and the individual (the state may kill but the individual may not) when what is needed is a sense of community, of togetherness.
You will notice that crime falls during times when a sense of community is felt, during a war for instance. Admittedly the absence of many men off fighting helps too, but the fact remains that when someone feels apart of something good they do not try to destroy.
However, I do accept that some people are intrinsically and irrevocably evil. These people should be sentenced to life, and I mean life. The problem with a death penalty is that while you will get these people, you will also find that the vast majority of those on the death row are from impoverished backgrounds and racial minorities. If you want to reduce crime, you don't need a death penalty, but a systematic program of social reform.
And I will say this again. Yes, some people may deserve to die in your eyes - child abductors, paedophiles, mass murderers, Osama bin Laden - but these people will be a tiny minority of those executed. The rest will be the poor in both monetary and educational terms. You need to tackle the roots of crime not wait until the tree has grown and chop off errant shoots with your capital punishment, because by then the crimes have been committed and your actions are empty.