The "Nintendo Games" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
Do you all remember the Legend of Zelda and Majora's Mask on N64?
Do you all remember the graphics,the temples and characters?
Now that the Gamecube is out theres a new Zelda game
in the making, coming soon. But when I saw the screen shots
in a Nintendo magazine I was totally shocked and disappointed.
They had made it look like a stupid little cartoon, leaving you wondering
what on earth was going through the designers head. He's disappointed
lots of Zelda fans and I can only hope he makes a new improved
Zelda game as a very quick follow up. Although it'd be nice to think that the screen shots are just a sick joke. Imagine playstation turning Lara Croft into a Powerpuff Girl lookalike, they'd be an uproar.
Do you all remember the graphics,the temples and characters?
Now that the Gamecube is out theres a new Zelda game
in the making, coming soon. But when I saw the screen shots
in a Nintendo magazine I was totally shocked and disappointed.
They had made it look like a stupid little cartoon, leaving you wondering
what on earth was going through the designers head. He's disappointed
lots of Zelda fans and I can only hope he makes a new improved
Zelda game as a very quick follow up. Although it'd be nice to think that the screen shots are just a sick joke. Imagine playstation turning Lara Croft into a Powerpuff Girl lookalike, they'd be an uproar.
Page:
quack wrote:
>[talking about a Tombraider game] its got brilliant gameplay,
You'll be the only one to think so.
>[talking about a Tombraider game] its got brilliant gameplay,
You'll be the only one to think so.
>
> I think you'll find that realistic graphics means no funny creatures,
> no hyrule, no link, infact no game because how can you have realism in
> something that's not?
>
> The graphics are brilliant and the gameplay is sure to be!
>
> Surely you should be happy you're getting something new! There's
> nothign set in stone that Miyamoto has to carry on with the Zelda
> series!
So Resident Evil is rubbish is it? Infact silly me, according to you it doesn't exist. Or are you in the habit of being chased around your town by Zombies? Who says you can't mix fantasy with a look of realism?
> I think you'll find that realistic graphics means no funny creatures,
> no hyrule, no link, infact no game because how can you have realism in
> something that's not?
>
> The graphics are brilliant and the gameplay is sure to be!
>
> Surely you should be happy you're getting something new! There's
> nothign set in stone that Miyamoto has to carry on with the Zelda
> series!
So Resident Evil is rubbish is it? Infact silly me, according to you it doesn't exist. Or are you in the habit of being chased around your town by Zombies? Who says you can't mix fantasy with a look of realism?
TOSH wrote:
> HES GOT A POINT
YOU DON'T HAVE TO POST EVERYTHING IN CAPITALS!
> HES GOT A POINT
YOU DON'T HAVE TO POST EVERYTHING IN CAPITALS!
Edgy wrote:
> If they did that, it might make the game a bit more fun to play
> instead of the dull and boring game it is. Why do you think you can
> buy Tomb Raider 3 for £4.99 on PC and get either Tomb Raider or
> Tomb Raider 2 for free with it from certain retailers?
um....cos its about 5 yrs old! and anyway its got brilliant gameplay, best of the third person shooters i think. if only they werent so repetitive... another reason they are that price, is theyr basically tomb raider 4 with worse graphics, and even then not that worse.
> If they did that, it might make the game a bit more fun to play
> instead of the dull and boring game it is. Why do you think you can
> buy Tomb Raider 3 for £4.99 on PC and get either Tomb Raider or
> Tomb Raider 2 for free with it from certain retailers?
um....cos its about 5 yrs old! and anyway its got brilliant gameplay, best of the third person shooters i think. if only they werent so repetitive... another reason they are that price, is theyr basically tomb raider 4 with worse graphics, and even then not that worse.
Cel-shading is evolution, not devolution.
> Are you actually going to listen this time?
>
> Zelda's graphics are GOOD!
> Yes, they look unimpressive in screenshots but does that matter.
Are you actually going to read what I have written, properly?
I have said that the game would be accepted as a good game.
I have said that both graphics and gameplay are equally important, my wanting the best of both worlds.
I am simply disappointed, and believe me I'm not the only one to have this opinion, that the game hasn't got a more realistic look, instead of going through what looks like a state of devolution.
>
> Zelda's graphics are GOOD!
> Yes, they look unimpressive in screenshots but does that matter.
Are you actually going to read what I have written, properly?
I have said that the game would be accepted as a good game.
I have said that both graphics and gameplay are equally important, my wanting the best of both worlds.
I am simply disappointed, and believe me I'm not the only one to have this opinion, that the game hasn't got a more realistic look, instead of going through what looks like a state of devolution.
OKay, Britgamer, quiz time. There are two games, which do you choose?
Game A- has cel shaded graphics and great gameplay.
Game B- has 'realistic' looking graphics and quite good gameplay.
The gameplay in game B isn't as good as in Game A, but still pretty good. But game B has 'cool' looking, realistic graphics! Link, the mythical fairy boy who saves the princess of a ficticious magical land constantly looks really realistic in Game B...
Game A- has cel shaded graphics and great gameplay.
Game B- has 'realistic' looking graphics and quite good gameplay.
The gameplay in game B isn't as good as in Game A, but still pretty good. But game B has 'cool' looking, realistic graphics! Link, the mythical fairy boy who saves the princess of a ficticious magical land constantly looks really realistic in Game B...
Page: