Viewing Thread:
"99p Flights To New York?"

Nope not missing the spammers and doing a bit myself :D

Click Here

Seems good at first but when you see the "extras" it's not as good but still a lot cheaper than at the minute.

I'm a bit dubious as to how good this offer could be as in my opinion long haul flights need to be as comfortable and enjoyable as possible to stop boredom and irritibality setting in.

When I flew to Paris on easyjet we basically got on the plane, sat down, flew for about 50 minutes and got off. No problem with such a short flight and I'd hardally read the in flight shopping brochure you get in the seats to read before we'd landed.

However on long haul I'd be very wary of "cost cutting". Sitting on a flight for 8-10 hours maybe even more like that would be very tedious and very boring as the facilities etc would be cut to save costs. Also I can't but help think that as there will be "normal" fares on the flight also that the prices for these seats will go up to offset some of the lost revenue from the cheaper seats so in effect other passengers will be subsidising the cheap seats.

I personally would stick with economy and have a more relaxing journey but what would you do? Would you be tempted to try and get one of these seats at the expense of some comfort to have more spending money when you get there or would you stick with economy (or business or first class if anyone flies them here :D)?

Really, you should have to be over 10 just to be able to leave your house. Maybe even 12.

No when i was born i was already 18 :\ ........... poor mother, ouchies


pb wrote:
> Apart from the fact that they are already covered by the
> disclaimer on every packet...

Curses.............i'll still find a way to get my cash money

Kawada wrote:
> But then i wouldn't be in said position as Kawada always plays it
> safe.
>
> Never having kids, everrrrrrrrrrrrr and if i ever did then i'd
> be suing the condom factory for millions so i'd just let the
> swedish nanny take care of the kids. Sorted

Apart from the fact that they are already covered by the disclaimer on every packet...

Anyway, that's not parents. That's bad parents.

And you weren't a kid?

But then i wouldn't be in said position as Kawada always plays it safe.

Never having kids, everrrrrrrrrrrrr and if i ever did then i'd be suing the condom factory for millions so i'd just let the swedish nanny take care of the kids. Sorted

Okay scenario time Kawada, you meet a wonderful girl, spend many wonderful nights together and then the day comes she approaches you and informs you that she's now pregnant, with twins. Unfortunately for you Kawada the only true protection against pregnancy is keeping your legs closed so it was bound to happen sooner or later. Oh so yeah what would you do then?

Perhaps you'll be the one with the pram running over peoples feet or taking them to the cinema because they bug you endlessly until you give in.

Or have people going round to said households with a shotgun :-D

I knew this one girl on a forum, she was very bitsy, she would always said you should need a license to have children to stop people like that.

meh, they're ok :-P

Kawada you must really detest those usually unemployed couples who sponge off benefits and have about 12 kids and one more on the way.