The "PC Games" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
y r games so expensive when cds r 10p to make each but new games are £30 each i say that that much profit is a sick way to get money take bill gates windows xp over £100 i don't now how he can sleep at night
Page:
Jees, where do they dig up people like that? No manners, morals or english lessons by the sound of it. :-D
God I don't know, I just hope he gets banned soon hes annoying me. Not that I'm bothered, its fun argueing with people like this, people who think their above everyone else, yet can't grasp the spelling of basic english. Or punctuation for that matter.
Stalking you? Don't flatter yourself; I've got better things to do than stalk an illiterate monkey boy such as you.
Eses wrote:
> I know wat u did last summer and stop stalking me cirpo i think that u
> soo hard to say cos ur stupid but i think that u have a crush with
> these chat rooms don't u huh huh p.s the bad spelling is text langage
> so was that.
Text talk or not, you still managed to spell Cipro wrong, cirpo indeed, which proves that you are illiterate anyway. In reference to his having a crush on SR, who wouldn't have? It's a great place to be. Spoiled only by the talking prunes like you that occasionally utter a monosylable or two to break the peace.
And where did you see the sign that said 'Posts limited to 160 characters'. Nowhere, thats right, this is a chat forum, not a giant text messaging board, so you are expected to speak proper english in here.
> I know wat u did last summer and stop stalking me cirpo i think that u
> soo hard to say cos ur stupid but i think that u have a crush with
> these chat rooms don't u huh huh p.s the bad spelling is text langage
> so was that.
Text talk or not, you still managed to spell Cipro wrong, cirpo indeed, which proves that you are illiterate anyway. In reference to his having a crush on SR, who wouldn't have? It's a great place to be. Spoiled only by the talking prunes like you that occasionally utter a monosylable or two to break the peace.
And where did you see the sign that said 'Posts limited to 160 characters'. Nowhere, thats right, this is a chat forum, not a giant text messaging board, so you are expected to speak proper english in here.
Little Hobbo wrote:
> so you are expected to speak proper english in
> here.
Not entirely accurate. I fought this point, and lost. People are allowed to talk crap.
> so you are expected to speak proper english in
> here.
Not entirely accurate. I fought this point, and lost. People are allowed to talk crap.
Insane Bartender wrote:
> Not entirely accurate. I fought this point, and lost. People are
> allowed to talk crap.
There is a difference between 'expected to' and 'allowed'. You are EXPECTED TO talk proper english, but you are ALLOWED to talk crap. But people respect you if you adhere to the former.
> Not entirely accurate. I fought this point, and lost. People are
> allowed to talk crap.
There is a difference between 'expected to' and 'allowed'. You are EXPECTED TO talk proper english, but you are ALLOWED to talk crap. But people respect you if you adhere to the former.
Little Hobbo wrote:
> There is a difference between 'expected to' and 'allowed'. You are
> EXPECTED TO talk proper english, but you are ALLOWED to talk crap.
> But people respect you if you adhere to the former.
i have no expectations, and most pther people don't expect much either. I think it is you with overly high standards that expects proper english.
I demanded proper english once, now I couldn't give a flying fart, so long as what I'm reading constitutes a readable and worthwhile post.
> There is a difference between 'expected to' and 'allowed'. You are
> EXPECTED TO talk proper english, but you are ALLOWED to talk crap.
> But people respect you if you adhere to the former.
i have no expectations, and most pther people don't expect much either. I think it is you with overly high standards that expects proper english.
I demanded proper english once, now I couldn't give a flying fart, so long as what I'm reading constitutes a readable and worthwhile post.
Insane Bartender wrote:
> i have no expectations, and most pther people don't expect much
> either. I think it is you with overly high standards that expects
> proper english.
>
> I demanded proper english once, now I couldn't give a flying fart, so
> long as what I'm reading constitutes a readable and worthwhile post.
Surely at least on sentence sticks out there.
'people respect you if you if you do'
Go figure
> i have no expectations, and most pther people don't expect much
> either. I think it is you with overly high standards that expects
> proper english.
>
> I demanded proper english once, now I couldn't give a flying fart, so
> long as what I'm reading constitutes a readable and worthwhile post.
Surely at least on sentence sticks out there.
'people respect you if you if you do'
Go figure
Little Hobbo wrote:
> Surely at least on sentence sticks out there.
> 'people respect you if you if you do'
>
> Go figure
And that is supposed to make sense and resolve the issue how exactly
What I love here is that no matter what inane crap I type down, you'll always come up with some equally drivel ridden answer. You read like an open book.
> Surely at least on sentence sticks out there.
> 'people respect you if you if you do'
>
> Go figure
And that is supposed to make sense and resolve the issue how exactly
What I love here is that no matter what inane crap I type down, you'll always come up with some equally drivel ridden answer. You read like an open book.
Page: