The "General Games Chat" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
Does anybody think the navigation of our site is confusing.
Please answer YES or NO and if YES state WHY.
Ta
Please answer YES or NO and if YES state WHY.
Ta
Page:
The navigation isn't confusing at all!
Everything's nice and easy..the way it should be.
Someone should put this Kid (ME) in an advert...I'm just too good.
Everything's nice and easy..the way it should be.
Someone should put this Kid (ME) in an advert...I'm just too good.
Parr wrote:
> No it hasn't been taken, i don't think. It would be good to have a
> hompage. You could use it for your best deals and to show happy member
> photos! A nice warming front brings more people inside
That's right (except the bit about happy member photo's).
And just to clarify, we had to pay heavily for SpecialReserve.com. Serves us right for failing to be the first to grab it.
> No it hasn't been taken, i don't think. It would be good to have a
> hompage. You could use it for your best deals and to show happy member
> photos! A nice warming front brings more people inside
That's right (except the bit about happy member photo's).
And just to clarify, we had to pay heavily for SpecialReserve.com. Serves us right for failing to be the first to grab it.
Mystique wrote:
> Tony wrote:
>
> Only a little bit, and only if it looks right when we test it.
> *****
> We?
> Ha ha yeah right Tonty. Like you work. I bet you just sit there like
> Mr. Burns trying to scheme up new ways to block out the sun and stuff
> with Snuggly following you around like Smithers.
> "Exxxcellent"
I wish
> Tony wrote:
>
> Only a little bit, and only if it looks right when we test it.
> *****
> We?
> Ha ha yeah right Tonty. Like you work. I bet you just sit there like
> Mr. Burns trying to scheme up new ways to block out the sun and stuff
> with Snuggly following you around like Smithers.
> "Exxxcellent"
I wish
VenomByte wrote:
> Tony wrote:
> Coming soon - SpecialReserve.com !!! You heard it first here.
>
> Ole
>
>
> Didn't somebody else nick that address? Have you resorted to a
> significant bribe?
No - specialseserve.com was genuinely registered by a company in the USA. One of the Directors of CEX (Computer Exchange) registered specialreserve.co.uk so that we could not get it. In business some people are like that.
> Tony wrote:
> Coming soon - SpecialReserve.com !!! You heard it first here.
>
> Ole
>
>
> Didn't somebody else nick that address? Have you resorted to a
> significant bribe?
No - specialseserve.com was genuinely registered by a company in the USA. One of the Directors of CEX (Computer Exchange) registered specialreserve.co.uk so that we could not get it. In business some people are like that.
Tony wrote:
> Only a little bit, and only if it looks right when we test it.
*****
We?
Ha ha yeah right Tonty. Like you work. I bet you just sit there like Mr. Burns trying to scheme up new ways to block out the sun and stuff with Snuggly following you around like Smithers.
"Exxxcellent"
> Only a little bit, and only if it looks right when we test it.
*****
We?
Ha ha yeah right Tonty. Like you work. I bet you just sit there like Mr. Burns trying to scheme up new ways to block out the sun and stuff with Snuggly following you around like Smithers.
"Exxxcellent"
No it hasn't been taken, i don't think. It would be good to have a hompage. You could use it for your best deals and to show happy member photos! A nice warming front brings more people inside
Tony wrote:
> Coming soon - SpecialReserve.com !!! You heard it first here.
>
> Ole
Didn't somebody else nick that address? Have you resorted to a significant bribe?
> Coming soon - SpecialReserve.com !!! You heard it first here.
>
> Ole
Didn't somebody else nick that address? Have you resorted to a significant bribe?
Tony wrote:
> cookie monster wrote:
> A new look SR?
>
> W00t!
>
> Only a little bit, and only if it looks right when we test it.
It should look great, familiarity is nice, but a change will do you good.
> cookie monster wrote:
> A new look SR?
>
> W00t!
>
> Only a little bit, and only if it looks right when we test it.
It should look great, familiarity is nice, but a change will do you good.
cookie monster wrote:
> A new look SR?
>
> W00t!
Only a little bit, and only if it looks right when we test it.
> A new look SR?
>
> W00t!
Only a little bit, and only if it looks right when we test it.
A new look SR?
W00t!
W00t!
Page: