The "General Games Chat" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
This thread has been linked to the game 'Grand Theft Auto: Vice City'.
Having seen the spec for GTA Vice City there is only one game to get this Christmas and its not a stupid old fart plumber that should have been flushed down the toilet along time ago.
Vice City looks awesome with 120 vehicles, 40 weapons, and 9hrs worth of audio in glorous DTS sound the Gamecubes rubbish disc could not even hold the audio not to mention having no Dolby sound anyway.
Still never mind Pokemon is coming and we all know the quality of that has been series.
Vice City looks awesome with 120 vehicles, 40 weapons, and 9hrs worth of audio in glorous DTS sound the Gamecubes rubbish disc could not even hold the audio not to mention having no Dolby sound anyway.
Still never mind Pokemon is coming and we all know the quality of that has been series.
Page:
FinalFantasyFanatic wrote:
> Ye_Olde_Boss_Pac_Man wrote:
> because its trojan horse poo.
>
>
> and dat's dat, ya crazy fool!
>
> I'd ask you to expand on your point. Everyone has their own opinions.
> Why do you dissagree with the majority? Why rate GTA3 so low? What
> would game of the year be to you then?
>
> Saying it's "trojan horse poo' is hardly civillized now, is it?
> State your point, then back it up with evidence you moron.
no.
teeheehee...
> Ye_Olde_Boss_Pac_Man wrote:
> because its trojan horse poo.
>
>
> and dat's dat, ya crazy fool!
>
> I'd ask you to expand on your point. Everyone has their own opinions.
> Why do you dissagree with the majority? Why rate GTA3 so low? What
> would game of the year be to you then?
>
> Saying it's "trojan horse poo' is hardly civillized now, is it?
> State your point, then back it up with evidence you moron.
no.
teeheehee...
Ye_Olde_Boss_Pac_Man wrote:
> because its trojan horse poo.
>
>
> and dat's dat, ya crazy fool!
I'd ask you to expand on your point. Everyone has their own opinions. Why do you dissagree with the majority? Why rate GTA3 so low? What would game of the year be to you then?
Saying it's "trojan horse poo' is hardly civillized now, is it?
State your point, then back it up with evidence you moron.
> because its trojan horse poo.
>
>
> and dat's dat, ya crazy fool!
I'd ask you to expand on your point. Everyone has their own opinions. Why do you dissagree with the majority? Why rate GTA3 so low? What would game of the year be to you then?
Saying it's "trojan horse poo' is hardly civillized now, is it?
State your point, then back it up with evidence you moron.
because its trojan horse poo.
and dat's dat, ya crazy fool!
and dat's dat, ya crazy fool!
100th post!
My copy of GTA had to be sent back to henst it camefrom, and i may endup loosing £20 on your hyped product!
My copy of GTA had to be sent back to henst it camefrom, and i may endup loosing £20 on your hyped product!
Boss_Pac_Man2 wrote:
> you clearly haven't listened to anything said. the new music system
> discussed would allow all the memory to easily be fitted onto the
> disk.
That would certainly help - but the game is still going to be on the big side. Also, I think some 1 said that loading time might be hit if there was a lot of decompressing to do.
> you clearly haven't listened to anything said. the new music system
> discussed would allow all the memory to easily be fitted onto the
> disk.
That would certainly help - but the game is still going to be on the big side. Also, I think some 1 said that loading time might be hit if there was a lot of decompressing to do.
Cheers to Armatige Shanks, yours was the only good answer i got. Would it be possible to tell me where you heard it. I'd like to get some details if possible.
HálloHowArtThou wrote:
> GTA3 on PC is sooo bad unless you've spent aroun
> £908623238382.37 on upgrading it
Runs fine on my P2-450?
> GTA3 on PC is sooo bad unless you've spent aroun
> £908623238382.37 on upgrading it
Runs fine on my P2-450?
AfroJoe wrote:
> Ant wrote:
> You just wait...Red Faction 2 will beat the pants off every FPS out
> there
>
> ---
>
> Yes, with its greatness.
Damn right AJ.
> Ant wrote:
> You just wait...Red Faction 2 will beat the pants off every FPS out
> there
>
> ---
>
> Yes, with its greatness.
Damn right AJ.
Dave RJR wrote:
> So, looks like Sony was right to go with DVD, not just for DVD movie
> playback, but for the extra space on the disc.
>
> GTA3, or VC is unlikely to ever appear on GC due to the
> ££££deal done with Sony. And in any case, it
> would almost certainly not fit on a single GC disc and would not be
> suitable for disc swapping.
>
> The Getaway is going to be another example of massive code and varried
> game play. Another example of a game that would almost certainly not
> fit on a single GC disc.
>
> Haven't used the PC version of GTA3. Some 1 said it was poor unless
> you spent lots of ££££ on a fast new pc. I bet
> there are some out there who claim they can run it fine on an old pc
> and it still beats the PS2 version. Well I am not the only one that
> appears to doubt this.
>
> I recall some one once saying that GTA3 would probably fit within a
> few hundred Mb, and that it was not a particularly demanding game
> (hardware wise). That has been blown well and truly out the water.
>
> Going by the previous texts on this topic, the limited capacity of the
> GC 1.5gb disc should be considered a major factor if your just about
> to buy a next gen console.
>
> At what of the future. GC games set to go beyond PS2 capabilities?
> Some how I doubt that. Special effects, real life graphics, digital
> sound, all require massive amounts of disc space. So what if the GC
> has a slight performance edge over PS2 (processor wise). If you cant
> store the data for the game (because you don't have enough disc
> space), then you cant stick the "big games" on your console.
> Still, you could go back to disc swapping!
you clearly haven't listened to anything said. the new music system discussed would allow all the memory to easily be fitted onto the disk.
> So, looks like Sony was right to go with DVD, not just for DVD movie
> playback, but for the extra space on the disc.
>
> GTA3, or VC is unlikely to ever appear on GC due to the
> ££££deal done with Sony. And in any case, it
> would almost certainly not fit on a single GC disc and would not be
> suitable for disc swapping.
>
> The Getaway is going to be another example of massive code and varried
> game play. Another example of a game that would almost certainly not
> fit on a single GC disc.
>
> Haven't used the PC version of GTA3. Some 1 said it was poor unless
> you spent lots of ££££ on a fast new pc. I bet
> there are some out there who claim they can run it fine on an old pc
> and it still beats the PS2 version. Well I am not the only one that
> appears to doubt this.
>
> I recall some one once saying that GTA3 would probably fit within a
> few hundred Mb, and that it was not a particularly demanding game
> (hardware wise). That has been blown well and truly out the water.
>
> Going by the previous texts on this topic, the limited capacity of the
> GC 1.5gb disc should be considered a major factor if your just about
> to buy a next gen console.
>
> At what of the future. GC games set to go beyond PS2 capabilities?
> Some how I doubt that. Special effects, real life graphics, digital
> sound, all require massive amounts of disc space. So what if the GC
> has a slight performance edge over PS2 (processor wise). If you cant
> store the data for the game (because you don't have enough disc
> space), then you cant stick the "big games" on your console.
> Still, you could go back to disc swapping!
you clearly haven't listened to anything said. the new music system discussed would allow all the memory to easily be fitted onto the disk.
Page: