The "General Games Chat" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
Xbox 2 WILL happen for sure. MS is in the games industry to stay.
When will Xbox 2 arrive, latest estimates are BEFORE PS3. A wise move?
It'll be xbox Live backwards compatable surely, as xbox live is a 20 year dream according to allard. Good stuff.
Wha do you want it to have? Games consoles will be turing more and more into all in one entertainment centres so spit it out.
Just a brainstorm of what Xbox 2 should be all about.
When will Xbox 2 arrive, latest estimates are BEFORE PS3. A wise move?
It'll be xbox Live backwards compatable surely, as xbox live is a 20 year dream according to allard. Good stuff.
Wha do you want it to have? Games consoles will be turing more and more into all in one entertainment centres so spit it out.
Just a brainstorm of what Xbox 2 should be all about.
Page:
Splinter Cell 2, yup.
er-no wrote:
> Thats all bs, no motherboard and supporting visuals could support such a process. No matter what Sony say.
Yes, Sony also said PS2 could be used by the military it was so powerful.
> Thats all bs, no motherboard and supporting visuals could support such a process. No matter what Sony say.
Yes, Sony also said PS2 could be used by the military it was so powerful.
Strafex wrote:
> By the way, all you fantasising about titles, enough with the ones
> with numbers on the end. If MS want a REALLY big impact, their main
> title will have to be something original.
>
> Halo worked a treat for this generation.
I dunno, Nintendo and Sony seem to do fine with the updates. ;-) Just a case of continuing the games which people enjoy.
> By the way, all you fantasising about titles, enough with the ones
> with numbers on the end. If MS want a REALLY big impact, their main
> title will have to be something original.
>
> Halo worked a treat for this generation.
I dunno, Nintendo and Sony seem to do fine with the updates. ;-) Just a case of continuing the games which people enjoy.
Strafex wrote:
> Sounds good, although the PS3's Cell is meant to be 250 Giga Hertz -
> almost 100 times as powerful than current 2700Mhz Intel chips.
> IBM have develloped new semiconductor technology or something to make
> this possible...
>
> I'm sure that Intel will be trying to beat this rather than use
> current "out-dated" technology.
Thats all bs, no motherboard and supporting visuals could support such a process. No matter what Sony say.
> Sounds good, although the PS3's Cell is meant to be 250 Giga Hertz -
> almost 100 times as powerful than current 2700Mhz Intel chips.
> IBM have develloped new semiconductor technology or something to make
> this possible...
>
> I'm sure that Intel will be trying to beat this rather than use
> current "out-dated" technology.
Thats all bs, no motherboard and supporting visuals could support such a process. No matter what Sony say.
By the way, all you fantasising about titles, enough with the ones with numbers on the end. If MS want a REALLY big impact, their main title will have to be something original.
Halo worked a treat for this generation.
Halo worked a treat for this generation.
er-no wrote:
> I have heard a 2700Mhz processor from Intel, probably dual processor
> as well. Backwards compatilbility and the option to connect the old to
> the new in terms of controllers and 8-player.
Sounds good, although the PS3's Cell is meant to be 250 Giga Hertz - almost 100 times as powerful than current 2700Mhz Intel chips.
IBM have develloped new semiconductor technology or something to make this possible...
I'm sure that Intel will be trying to beat this rather than use current "out-dated" technology.
> I have heard a 2700Mhz processor from Intel, probably dual processor
> as well. Backwards compatilbility and the option to connect the old to
> the new in terms of controllers and 8-player.
Sounds good, although the PS3's Cell is meant to be 250 Giga Hertz - almost 100 times as powerful than current 2700Mhz Intel chips.
IBM have develloped new semiconductor technology or something to make this possible...
I'm sure that Intel will be trying to beat this rather than use current "out-dated" technology.
Splinter Cell 2, yup.
Maverick42 wrote:
> Really, there's no difference between 5.1 and Pro Logic II. In fact, I
> can't tell the difference with just my TV's sound. I just don't see
> the point in spending a load of cash on something you don't need.
Bah. I cannot be bothered to explain the difference between pro logic and 5.1, ask garbe or some1 else with a system.
> Really, there's no difference between 5.1 and Pro Logic II. In fact, I
> can't tell the difference with just my TV's sound. I just don't see
> the point in spending a load of cash on something you don't need.
Bah. I cannot be bothered to explain the difference between pro logic and 5.1, ask garbe or some1 else with a system.
Really, there's no difference between 5.1 and Pro Logic II. In fact, I can't tell the difference with just my TV's sound. I just don't see the point in spending a load of cash on something you don't need.
Maverick42 wrote:
> The graphics would be the same, and the sound
> wouldn't be changed nor the gameworld.
No they graphics would be crisp, smooth, and slightly more realistic. Sound would be changed, trust me ask people with 5.1 systems, its a different gamin expericance.
> The graphics would be the same, and the sound
> wouldn't be changed nor the gameworld.
No they graphics would be crisp, smooth, and slightly more realistic. Sound would be changed, trust me ask people with 5.1 systems, its a different gamin expericance.
Page: