The "General Games Chat" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
A) No Zelda review, jsuit a rubbishy 'preplay'.
and B) The star letter simply stated how good 4way multiplayer is.
Well done.
*claps slowly*
At least I'd have a chance of winning summat though......
and B) The star letter simply stated how good 4way multiplayer is.
Well done.
*claps slowly*
At least I'd have a chance of winning summat though......
Page:
Maverick42 wrote:
> Cyclone wrote:
> A) No Zelda review, jsuit a rubbishy 'preplay'.
>
> Nintendo Official Magazine are, and will always be a UK magazine. They
> review and speak about UK games - nothing more, nothing less. That's
> one of their strong points.
Sure, but as a dedicated Nintendo gamer, I would like to know their real opinion, and as such, NGC is far better at that, as the review non-PAL games too. I'm sure its not their fault, but the mag is all the less because of it. And thats not my main gripe.
> B) The star letter simply stated how good 4way multiplayer is.
>
> In layman's terms it's that, but in reality it's quite an in-depth
> description of how important four player multiplayer is to today's
> games, and how it's now something of a standard.
No. It was a letter saying how great 4 player is. A letter about that actualy had any imagination or quirkyness would have been better.
> NOM don't try to be sophisticated - just a fun, and relaxing magazine
> that can be read easily. They have the most detailed and well
> presented news section, and the layout's great too.
I know they are not, but there is a limit. The News is good, but not anything special. And NGC has thqat nice little feautre about certain issues, where the team give their honest views.
> Give them some credit, they deserve it.
That may be, but it still sucks.
:D
> Cyclone wrote:
> A) No Zelda review, jsuit a rubbishy 'preplay'.
>
> Nintendo Official Magazine are, and will always be a UK magazine. They
> review and speak about UK games - nothing more, nothing less. That's
> one of their strong points.
Sure, but as a dedicated Nintendo gamer, I would like to know their real opinion, and as such, NGC is far better at that, as the review non-PAL games too. I'm sure its not their fault, but the mag is all the less because of it. And thats not my main gripe.
> B) The star letter simply stated how good 4way multiplayer is.
>
> In layman's terms it's that, but in reality it's quite an in-depth
> description of how important four player multiplayer is to today's
> games, and how it's now something of a standard.
No. It was a letter saying how great 4 player is. A letter about that actualy had any imagination or quirkyness would have been better.
> NOM don't try to be sophisticated - just a fun, and relaxing magazine
> that can be read easily. They have the most detailed and well
> presented news section, and the layout's great too.
I know they are not, but there is a limit. The News is good, but not anything special. And NGC has thqat nice little feautre about certain issues, where the team give their honest views.
> Give them some credit, they deserve it.
That may be, but it still sucks.
:D
You realise that the other magazines all review the UK games as well, but they also review the American and japanese games.
It's not exactly a strong point, especially seeing as lots of the revews are under 200 words.
It's not exactly a strong point, especially seeing as lots of the revews are under 200 words.
Cyclone wrote:
> A) No Zelda review, jsuit a rubbishy 'preplay'.
Nintendo Official Magazine are, and will always be a UK magazine. They review and speak about UK games - nothing more, nothing less. That's one of their strong points.
> B) The star letter simply stated how good 4way multiplayer is.
In layman's terms it's that, but in reality it's quite an in-depth description of how important four player multiplayer is to today's games, and how it's now something of a standard.
NOM don't try to be sophisticated - just a fun, and relaxing magazine that can be read easily. They have the most detailed and well presented news section, and the layout's great too.
Give them some credit, they deserve it.
> A) No Zelda review, jsuit a rubbishy 'preplay'.
Nintendo Official Magazine are, and will always be a UK magazine. They review and speak about UK games - nothing more, nothing less. That's one of their strong points.
> B) The star letter simply stated how good 4way multiplayer is.
In layman's terms it's that, but in reality it's quite an in-depth description of how important four player multiplayer is to today's games, and how it's now something of a standard.
NOM don't try to be sophisticated - just a fun, and relaxing magazine that can be read easily. They have the most detailed and well presented news section, and the layout's great too.
Give them some credit, they deserve it.
They aren't allowed to review non-pal games.
Ha.
Ha.
beacuase... They had to do a 'preplay' as it wasn't a PAL Version.
Nuff said :D
Nuff said :D
Star letter one time:
"I think Ocarina Of Time is Great! You can do whatever you want and it lasts ages. Thanks for recommending it guys!"
This won an n64 game.
Michael Owen's Soccer or something.
"I think Ocarina Of Time is Great! You can do whatever you want and it lasts ages. Thanks for recommending it guys!"
This won an n64 game.
Michael Owen's Soccer or something.
A) No Zelda review, jsuit a rubbishy 'preplay'.
and B) The star letter simply stated how good 4way multiplayer is.
Well done.
*claps slowly*
At least I'd have a chance of winning summat though......
and B) The star letter simply stated how good 4way multiplayer is.
Well done.
*claps slowly*
At least I'd have a chance of winning summat though......
Page: