The "General Games Chat" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
and B) The star letter simply stated how good 4way multiplayer is.
Well done.
*claps slowly*
At least I'd have a chance of winning summat though......
If a game is hyped beyond belief - 10/10
If a game is hyped muchly - 9/10
If a game is earth-shatteringly brilliant, but not hyped (Like GTA3 was) - 8/10
If a game has no hype and is an above average game - 5/10
If a game has some hype but is crap - 7/10.
Simple. Other scores are when the game falls between two categories. Or sucks.
> Because they have to promote Nintendo's games in an attempt to keep
> sales higher. It's the same with official magazines for anything...
> which is why I tend to avoid them.
NOM aren't biased - just leniant. For example, they don't just give Nintendo games high scores - anything can get a freak score. Usually though, they actually tend to agree with NGC's scores.
Also, if they were biased - would they have quotes in their magazine saying things such as 'Maybe it's time to buy an X-Box', or would they have Doshin The Giant in their games bin?
> EDGE is far superior. Far, Far superior to everything else. Apart from
> Playboy
EDGE is complete, overrated rubbish. GamesTM is oh so much better, and in fact, the best magazine I've ever read. And at only £4, everyone should go out and buy it. Now.
> EDGE is far superior. Far, Far superior to everything else.....
*
.....and utterly, utterly boring.
> .....and utterly, utterly boring.
Agree entirely. Their reviews are well written, but apart from that, it's all a load of mindless, boring dribble.
And its not boring.
Its very very informative.
If a little short lived.
Are they just trying to rub it in our faces that the game won't be getting a PAL release?
Do NOM still use "GreyStation" to describe the PS2?