The "Sony Games" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
I want u guys to name decent things about the gamecube. Even though its not out here yet do you reckon it will challenge the ps2 for its crown?
> That is true - but the mario games are not technicly sequels - They are all very
> different (Mario Tennis/party - completely different) BUT they are ALL good -
> Most of the PS games that are continued are absoloute rubbish.
yeah sure, shows how much PS1 games you've played :-)
dude I'll speak to you properly when you've get some sence, or then again your a ninty so thats unlikely to happen.
besides the launch "updates" I can't think of many sequels so if you've got nothing more interesting to say please go away.
(wrenches 'crap talking' needle out of his arm)
HHHhHhHhAHflkf!!!!
REd Faction is better than Perfect Dark? Yes. Of course it is. Hmmm. That linear one minded game is so much better than that other linear game which has almost 20 times the amount of things to do and play with. Of course.
Perfect Dark is one f the best FPS ever made. What is Red Faction? An imitator to being great - Nothing new, nothing innovated!
> i like how people keep saying oh look at all the sequels the PS2 has. and then
> go on to moan why can't the PS2 get anything original well they seem not to
> notice the major culprit of sequels and other tie in games are nintendo by far.
> how many different mario games have we had must be approaching 30 different
> things by now, mario world, mario golf, mario paint, mario RPG loads of
> different things then the pokemon farnchise pokemon red, blue, yellow, gold,
> silver, crystal, stadium, stadium 2.
you see nintendo does loads of sequels so
> why don't anyone say anything bout that. i couldn't care less what number a
> games got in front of it as long as it's good. i wonder if all these people
> complaining bout sequels on PS2 are complaining bout 2 certain games called MGS2
> and GTA3 probably 2 of the greatest games of all time.
same for nintendo if
> mario 368 is good enough and got enough changes then i would buy it the number
> of the game ain't a factor
You see there's a difference between Nintendo sequels and sequels on the Playstation. You may say that Mario 64 was a sequel. Well yes, but it was the only Mario game on the N64. Nintendo sequels are about 1 maybe 2 a console. Whereas on the Playstation say, you get a new Tomb Raider game EVERY year! That's my point!
:)
> Well, if GBA games are £31.99 at SR prices, either 'cube games will be
> over £40 or GBA prices will drop when the 'cube is released.
that is just because on SR the GBA games dont get the same amount of discount as the PS2 games. Most PS2 games cost £40-£45 in the shops while GBA games cost £30-£35.
(2 years ago, in the Nintendo forum in a topic called Playsation 2)
: What will you have - another Metal Gear Solid, another Final Fantasy, another Ridge Racer, another Gran Turismo, another Crash Bandicoot, another Syphon Filter, another FIFA, etc etc etc.
My point is that although the Gamecube will have sequels, they, like (most of) the above games are very good, and are worth buying. I don't think anything the PS2 has so far or is promising to produce/d could match the expectation of playing an even sublimer version of Perfect Dark against 29 other people on the net, RCPs blazing!
GC + points - Nintendo games, + extra 3rd party support, sequels mixed with newer games (SSX etc etc) and Sega support, plus completely new titles.
(oh and, the only two good series above are FF and MGS - and FF may be on GC - I hope!)