The "General Games Chat" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
So far I'm not at all impressed.....with the weight, only took me about 5 minutes to get home, in that short space of time I had to keep swapping arms that I was carrying the bag in because they were aching so much. Thank god the shops are only a few minutes from my house, i'd have had to get a taxi otherwise. What really made me laugh was the girl behind the till put the console in a bag and as she was passing it to me, the handles broke.
Anyway I got Halo (of course) MGS2: Substance and Jet Set Radio Future. So far from what i've played of Halo it's gonna be a bloody brilliant game, excellent mass battle type things and most of the guns rock my socks. ONe thing I don't like is the bit on the 2nd level where you have to drive the Warthog, those things handle terribly, i just wanted to get out and shoot stuff normally. Small gripe though because the rest of the stuff i've done rocked.
JSR: future from what i've played is gonna be just as good as the 1st game if not better, not particuarly enthralled by the new graffiti method or the lamp post climbing but i'll get used to it.
Haven't bothered with MGS2 yet.
So far so good then, first product i've ever owned from Microsoft that i've been completly satisfied with.
To me, every level works near perfect, even the Library level. At that stage of the game you feel like you will never reach your objective, just as it should be for an important part of the game. You get near endless waves of Flood, and this all adds to the gameplay. Even the Assault on the control room, the indoor levels contrast against the world outside of them, it's supposed to be an installation, not a designer's free for all.
And I find it really weak that someone will harp on and on about a game's faults yet never list what games they like.
Because I promise you, whatever your favourite game is, I can pull it down.
It's personal opinion, and why people expend so much energy trying to change someone else's opinions always strikes me as pointless.
*looks at poster below this*...nah, Xbox Forum is neutral.
Repetition does not necessarily make a bad game.
I found it to be a tad too repetitive at times and why Edge rated it 10/10 has, quite frankly, amazed me.
Unless it's a light gun game, or Steel Battalion.
> Because I promise you, whatever your favourite game is, I can pull it
> down.
>
> It's personal opinion, and why people expend so much energy trying to
> change someone else's opinions always strikes me as pointless.
>
...
Who said I was trying to change opinions? I'm giving my opinion and nothing more.
And making games too realistic makes them crap. I've said it many times before, the real world is boring - so setting a game as close to the real world as possible results in a boring game. A real library may very well be huge and consist of the same shape and layout throughout, but surely they had the sense to realise this would make a very boring and dull game.
And why would I want to list games I like? The discussion in this thread was about Halo, so I added my opinion. If it was a thread about Splinter Cell, I would have added my opinion. Are you so stupid as to think it would be ideal for me to provide a long list of games I like, every time I say something negative about another game?
And stop jumping to accusations, I haven't even said Halo was bad, I said the indoor levels get boring because they only use one wall texture and 3 different shaped rooms to make it out of.
I would say Halo is 'very good but does not break new ground'.