Viewing Thread:
"Gettin X-Box"

I am gettin an X-Box, i reckon 2 get Burnout2 and Enter Matrix. Have heard Matrix is 2 linear is this tru. Dont advise 2 get Halo, as already got that (won as prize on TV)

ÂLŠ†ÂÎR wrote:
> Sorry but what the hell do they know about Halo 2? Everyone has only
> seen the opening level and ideas have been kept very close to Bungie
> so far.

Bit of a bad example, actually. All I'm saying is they're not smarmy gits saying that they're incredibly disappointed with Halo 2 as it seems pretty much more of the same, just to be 'controversial'. They mention it is a slight letdown but end up saying it looks like an amazing title.

Tiltawhirl wrote:
> Hedfix wrote:
> EDGE = Sony wh*re$.
>
> Edge actually seem to prefer Nintendo last time I looked.

Oh fair enough. Wh*res to whoever's throwing the most money at them. :D

ignous reef, rather than games, may I suggest some lessons in how to write/type properly?

Hedfix wrote:
> EDGE = Sony wh*re$.

Edge actually seem to prefer Nintendo last time I looked.

Maverick42 wrote:
> What, I'm not allowed to have opinions?

No.

Nothing personal, just I'm the only one allowed to have opinions.

*tries to remove tongue from cheek*
*fails*

EDGE = Sony wh*re$.

The end.

Sorry but what the hell do they know about Halo 2? Everyone has only seen the opening level and ideas have been kept very close to Bungie so far.

In what way are they trying to be controversial? Skimming through this issue, they correctly point out that Halo 2 looks excellent, albeit slightly unoriginal. Plus, their review scores are fair and justified.

You mean they used to say what they thought, now they're just trying to be controversial, maybe it's like a breakaway Edge sect or something...

GamesTM = New Edge?

No. They say what they think, as opposed to being purposely controversial.