The "Freeola Customer Forum" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
> Geffdof wrote:
> I'll correct you. It was written much earlier than that. The
> council of Nicea met in 300 AD to make the Nicean creed which
> is
> based on the bible and it had already been around for hundreds
> of
> years. Im not an historian so I dont know how they date stuff
> like this, but historical records etc show that the bible was
> written not too long after Jesus' death. Im talking about 30-40
> years here. Maybe less maybe more, Im not totally sure. Anyway,
> it was written as a first hand account. The Koran on the other
> hand WAS written after 600AD. Its possible you are thinking of
> that.
>
> Historical records? What records are these? I mean why is
> there such debate about the origins of the gospels if records
> exist?
There is no debate on the origin of the Gospels. The only debate is about gospels that arent in the bible and possibly should be.
> Fake bibles? What were they?
Laser printed covers with instuctions for floppys inside!
At least they now know God's views on people lacking libido.
> I'll correct you. It was written much earlier than that. The
> council of Nicea met in 300 AD to make the Nicean creed which is
> based on the bible and it had already been around for hundreds of
> years. Im not an historian so I dont know how they date stuff
> like this, but historical records etc show that the bible was
> written not too long after Jesus' death. Im talking about 30-40
> years here. Maybe less maybe more, Im not totally sure. Anyway,
> it was written as a first hand account. The Koran on the other
> hand WAS written after 600AD. Its possible you are thinking of
> that.
Historical records? What records are these? I mean why is there such debate about the origins of the gospels if records exist?
> People died trying
> to spread the gospel message so that makes me think they believed
> it themselves and its not some elaborate story and they were
> witnesses to Jesus' life
Anyone is welcome to correct me here but i'm sure i read that the bible wasn't written until about 800AD. If thats the case then there is an obvious problem with it being written by witnesses.
The whole thing strikes me as chinese whispers and nothing more.
I can only offer my personal experiences and must admit it is difficult for anyone too accept this from a total stranger. Over thirty years ago I first witnessed the ‘psychic’ connection from a family member. This person had no reason to fake or have any material gain from this. It was a gift handed down the female line in the family from generation to generation. At first I was a skeptic, was it the power of the mined, if so a phenomena not accepted by the scientific community either. I soon became aware after a few more demonstrations of a tremendous emotional sensation. The ability to move physical objects that communicated ‘yes’ or ‘no’ to specific questions were witnessed. This person has now passed over, three years ago, and it is her who made my wife aware of my cancer, if I had not done anything I would not be here today if left untreated because of the stage and aggressiveness I was at.
Most religions as written by man in the last 2000 years cannot accept or recognize the possibility of connecting with those who pass on. Although Jesus was resurrected and all our soul’s will return to the father (God). It is worth reflecting that faith has been around a lot longer than 2 millennia and the battle between good and evil is more important than who’s God is better than the other.
There are two kinds of people I guess. For me, the glass is half empty, and I don't believe anything unless there is reason that I should. Others see a glass half full, and beleive anything they're told unless they are certain it is false. Extremes, but you get the point.