Viewing Thread:
"How long before we shoot all the dogs"

With all this debate about carbon emissions, how long will it be before some bright spark decides that millions of nice little doggies are only good for turning food into poo, and emitting carbon?

Will we be forced to turn on the animals and expunge them in their droves, or what better ways are there to reduce carbon emissions?

Snuggly

Hedfix wrote:
> Tubes

They had to uncensor that when YouTube became popular.

Yes the censoring needs a little updating aswell as the mod powers =)

I hope £15 billion isnt the real cost of the Olympics. I thought we were suppose to make money from them, not get into debt because of them.

Getting back to the cows. I think something as simple as changing their feed could cut the methane by as much as 20%. Well that's what Midlands Today told me earlier.

Tubes

Tony wrote:
> Hi N*n

Nin
Just checking i'm in the filter. I wouldn't be suprised. 'ello mister.

Hi N*n

Tony wrote:
> I think we should cancel the Olympic Games and spend £15
> billion on sea defence d*kes with wind generators on top of them
> and wave and tide generators in front of them.
>
> Can you believe it - I was stopped from saying d i k e s

I do declare this one of the best moments in my 3 years here.

I think we should cancel the Olympic Games and spend £15 billion on sea defence d*kes with wind generators on top of them and wave and tide generators in front of them.

Can you believe it - I was stopped from saying d i k e s

Tony wrote:
> pb wrote:
> Basically, we're all doomed unless we have a big war, wipe out
> half the population of the earth and then those that are left
> live in harmony with nature, calling themselves 'petal' or
> 'rosebud' and dancing around trees naked.
>
> So, religion is good for reducing carbon emissions. Blimey, we
> would be roasted by global warming were it not for all those
> religious wars. Now there's a devine theory.

Yes, it's all predetermined...

pb wrote:
> Basically, we're all doomed unless we have a big war, wipe out
> half the population of the earth and then those that are left
> live in harmony with nature, calling themselves 'petal' or
> 'rosebud' and dancing around trees naked.

So, religion is good for reducing carbon emissions. Blimey, we would be roasted by global warming were it not for all those religious wars. Now there's a devine theory.