The "Freeola Customer Forum" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
With all this debate about carbon emissions, how long will it be before some bright spark decides that millions of nice little doggies are only good for turning food into poo, and emitting carbon?
Will we be forced to turn on the animals and expunge them in their droves, or what better ways are there to reduce carbon emissions?
Will we be forced to turn on the animals and expunge them in their droves, or what better ways are there to reduce carbon emissions?
Page:
Machie wrote:
> nuke the cows instead!
Yes that is good, however, I do like my milk and beef so no, we cannot do that!
> nuke the cows instead!
Yes that is good, however, I do like my milk and beef so no, we cannot do that!
nuke the cows instead!
My friend had the world saving idea of nuking China, I slapped him upside his head.
Apart from the solution of reducing the use of oil and cars, we can burn all the cows, they produce a lot of methane gas. Alas that would be fatal to mankind.
Back to steam power methinks.
Back to steam power methinks.
Sunflower wrote:
> I use to know a boy with the surname D**e
I still know boys with surnames, and don't call me D**e...
{Drum Roll, Tumbleweed, silence, leaves stage}
> I use to know a boy with the surname D**e
I still know boys with surnames, and don't call me D**e...
{Drum Roll, Tumbleweed, silence, leaves stage}
I use to know a boy with the surname D**e
Tony wrote:
> D***s and d***s are now officially allowed providing they are of
> the mud and stone variety.
Does that mean we can't talk about the former Director-General of the BBC? Greg ****
> D***s and d***s are now officially allowed providing they are of
> the mud and stone variety.
Does that mean we can't talk about the former Director-General of the BBC? Greg ****
D***s and d***s are now officially allowed providing they are of the mud and stone variety.
We will invest in a contextual rejection tool which will automatically wipe out your post if scores more than 8 out of 10 for anger or suspect content. It will leave the post in place just long enough for you to think the post has made it through the checks unnoticed, and then it will wipe it out and send you a spam email recommending therapy.
We will invest in a contextual rejection tool which will automatically wipe out your post if scores more than 8 out of 10 for anger or suspect content. It will leave the post in place just long enough for you to think the post has made it through the checks unnoticed, and then it will wipe it out and send you a spam email recommending therapy.
That's even better the word it's trying to block isn't! :D
Nin wrote:
> Tony wrote:
> I think we should cancel the Olympic Games and spend £15
> billion on sea defence d*kes with wind generators on top of
> them
> and wave and tide generators in front of them.
>
> Can you believe it - I was stopped from saying d i k e s
>
> I do declare this one of the best moments in my 3 years here.
Me too! :D
D***s.
> Tony wrote:
> I think we should cancel the Olympic Games and spend £15
> billion on sea defence d*kes with wind generators on top of
> them
> and wave and tide generators in front of them.
>
> Can you believe it - I was stopped from saying d i k e s
>
> I do declare this one of the best moments in my 3 years here.
Me too! :D
D***s.
Page: