The "General Games Chat" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
The notion is that a new 'label' is given to people who cause concern on the forums.
Basically they are shown a pink warning card - that's in between yellow and red - and following this they are a "Pinkie" for a specified period of time.
Their name of course turns to pink.
Ladies and Gennelmen - it's YOOOOUUUR CALL, YUURE CHOICE.
(why thanks Hughie, but what happened to Murray Walker)
Basically they are shown a pink warning card - that's in between yellow and red - and following this they are a "Pinkie" for a specified period of time.
Their name of course turns to pink.
Ladies and Gennelmen - it's YOOOOUUUR CALL, YUURE CHOICE.
(why thanks Hughie, but what happened to Murray Walker)
Page:
I'm all for different colours you see. I suggested that these 'trouble-makers' should be a: pinkie-with-yellow-dotsie because it would be funny and urine taking.
Or, they could be a yellow-with-black-dotsie. Then this would give the impression that they're poisonous. (to those who know about poisonous frogs)
Or, they could be a yellow-with-black-dotsie. Then this would give the impression that they're poisonous. (to those who know about poisonous frogs)
Isn't pink a bit camp?
pb wrote:
> hm. I was thinking about this a bit more last night and now I think I agree with Goatboy that it isn't going to work.
I agree there are some possible problems, but I have to think it through fully. I'm not sure people would want to be a Pinkie (just for a lark) if they knew that the next step was to be banned. Therefore I think it could work with the right handling.
> hm. I was thinking about this a bit more last night and now I think I agree with Goatboy that it isn't going to work.
I agree there are some possible problems, but I have to think it through fully. I'm not sure people would want to be a Pinkie (just for a lark) if they knew that the next step was to be banned. Therefore I think it could work with the right handling.
hm. I was thinking about this a bit more last night and now I think I agree with Goatboy that it isn't going to work.
Tony, can I have my name pink?
I wanna pink notable name! I wanna be a pink notable!
Please? Just for a day or two? I wanna pink name!
Everyweek there should be a pink notable for the most annoying notable!
I would be pink fffooorrreeevveerrr.....
I wanna pink notable name! I wanna be a pink notable!
Please? Just for a day or two? I wanna pink name!
Everyweek there should be a pink notable for the most annoying notable!
I would be pink fffooorrreeevveerrr.....
Great - now that's all sorted out, could I have some more ideas in the speech thread?!
SnoopDoggyDan wrote:
> I vote yes to pinkies!!
Hi Snoopy - back already. Did you pass your degree?
> I vote yes to pinkies!!
Hi Snoopy - back already. Did you pass your degree?
Atomic_Koala wrote:
> Myst1que wrote:
> no ot black keep it pink then they have to
> have the humilliation of
> being a pinkie!
s'pose. But
> instead of "regular", what would their status be? trouble
> maker? pain in the rear end?
er - I think some people missed the point here. They would be a "Pinkie"
> Myst1que wrote:
> no ot black keep it pink then they have to
> have the humilliation of
> being a pinkie!
s'pose. But
> instead of "regular", what would their status be? trouble
> maker? pain in the rear end?
er - I think some people missed the point here. They would be a "Pinkie"
I totally disagree coz I'm bound to be pinkied some time or other!!
Nah, i like some of the ideas here, maybe pinkieing, having Under Caution as the tagline and having an official reason in the stats would be a good idea.
I agree with pinkieing.
Nah, i like some of the ideas here, maybe pinkieing, having Under Caution as the tagline and having an official reason in the stats would be a good idea.
I agree with pinkieing.
Page: